Cargando…

The Effect of Genetic and Environmental Variation on Genital Size in Male Drosophila: Canalized but Developmentally Unstable

The genitalia of most male arthropods scale hypoallometrically with body size, that is they are more or less the same size across large and small individuals in a population. Such scaling is expected to arise when genital traits show less variation than somatic traits in response to factors that gen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dreyer, Austin P., Shingleton, Alexander W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028278
_version_ 1782218497306132480
author Dreyer, Austin P.
Shingleton, Alexander W.
author_facet Dreyer, Austin P.
Shingleton, Alexander W.
author_sort Dreyer, Austin P.
collection PubMed
description The genitalia of most male arthropods scale hypoallometrically with body size, that is they are more or less the same size across large and small individuals in a population. Such scaling is expected to arise when genital traits show less variation than somatic traits in response to factors that generate size variation among individuals in a population. Nevertheless, there have been few studies directly examining the relative sensitivity of genital and somatic traits to factors that affect their size. Such studies are key to understanding genital evolution and the evolution of morphological scaling relationships more generally. Previous studies indicate that the size of genital traits in male Drosophila melanogaster show a relatively low response to variation in environmental factors that affect trait size. Here we show that the size of genital traits in male fruit flies also exhibit a relatively low response to variation in genetic factors that affect trait size. Importantly, however, this low response is only to genetic factors that affect body and organ size systemically, not those that affect organ size autonomously. Further, we show that the genital traits do not show low levels of developmental instability, which is the response to stochastic developmental errors that also influence organ size autonomously. We discuss these results in the context of current hypotheses on the proximate and ultimate mechanisms that generate genital hypoallometry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3234266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32342662011-12-15 The Effect of Genetic and Environmental Variation on Genital Size in Male Drosophila: Canalized but Developmentally Unstable Dreyer, Austin P. Shingleton, Alexander W. PLoS One Research Article The genitalia of most male arthropods scale hypoallometrically with body size, that is they are more or less the same size across large and small individuals in a population. Such scaling is expected to arise when genital traits show less variation than somatic traits in response to factors that generate size variation among individuals in a population. Nevertheless, there have been few studies directly examining the relative sensitivity of genital and somatic traits to factors that affect their size. Such studies are key to understanding genital evolution and the evolution of morphological scaling relationships more generally. Previous studies indicate that the size of genital traits in male Drosophila melanogaster show a relatively low response to variation in environmental factors that affect trait size. Here we show that the size of genital traits in male fruit flies also exhibit a relatively low response to variation in genetic factors that affect trait size. Importantly, however, this low response is only to genetic factors that affect body and organ size systemically, not those that affect organ size autonomously. Further, we show that the genital traits do not show low levels of developmental instability, which is the response to stochastic developmental errors that also influence organ size autonomously. We discuss these results in the context of current hypotheses on the proximate and ultimate mechanisms that generate genital hypoallometry. Public Library of Science 2011-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3234266/ /pubmed/22174784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028278 Text en Dreyer, Shingleton. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dreyer, Austin P.
Shingleton, Alexander W.
The Effect of Genetic and Environmental Variation on Genital Size in Male Drosophila: Canalized but Developmentally Unstable
title The Effect of Genetic and Environmental Variation on Genital Size in Male Drosophila: Canalized but Developmentally Unstable
title_full The Effect of Genetic and Environmental Variation on Genital Size in Male Drosophila: Canalized but Developmentally Unstable
title_fullStr The Effect of Genetic and Environmental Variation on Genital Size in Male Drosophila: Canalized but Developmentally Unstable
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Genetic and Environmental Variation on Genital Size in Male Drosophila: Canalized but Developmentally Unstable
title_short The Effect of Genetic and Environmental Variation on Genital Size in Male Drosophila: Canalized but Developmentally Unstable
title_sort effect of genetic and environmental variation on genital size in male drosophila: canalized but developmentally unstable
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028278
work_keys_str_mv AT dreyeraustinp theeffectofgeneticandenvironmentalvariationongenitalsizeinmaledrosophilacanalizedbutdevelopmentallyunstable
AT shingletonalexanderw theeffectofgeneticandenvironmentalvariationongenitalsizeinmaledrosophilacanalizedbutdevelopmentallyunstable
AT dreyeraustinp effectofgeneticandenvironmentalvariationongenitalsizeinmaledrosophilacanalizedbutdevelopmentallyunstable
AT shingletonalexanderw effectofgeneticandenvironmentalvariationongenitalsizeinmaledrosophilacanalizedbutdevelopmentallyunstable