Cargando…

Systematic Conservation Planning in the Face of Climate Change: Bet-Hedging on the Columbia Plateau

Systematic conservation planning efforts typically focus on protecting current patterns of biodiversity. Climate change is poised to shift species distributions, reshuffle communities, and alter ecosystem functioning. In such a dynamic environment, lands selected to protect today's biodiversity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schloss, Carrie A., Lawler, Joshua J., Larson, Eric R., Papendick, Hilary L., Case, Michael J., Evans, Daniel M., DeLap, Jack H., Langdon, Jesse G. R., Hall, Sonia A., McRae, Brad H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028788
_version_ 1782218499180986368
author Schloss, Carrie A.
Lawler, Joshua J.
Larson, Eric R.
Papendick, Hilary L.
Case, Michael J.
Evans, Daniel M.
DeLap, Jack H.
Langdon, Jesse G. R.
Hall, Sonia A.
McRae, Brad H.
author_facet Schloss, Carrie A.
Lawler, Joshua J.
Larson, Eric R.
Papendick, Hilary L.
Case, Michael J.
Evans, Daniel M.
DeLap, Jack H.
Langdon, Jesse G. R.
Hall, Sonia A.
McRae, Brad H.
author_sort Schloss, Carrie A.
collection PubMed
description Systematic conservation planning efforts typically focus on protecting current patterns of biodiversity. Climate change is poised to shift species distributions, reshuffle communities, and alter ecosystem functioning. In such a dynamic environment, lands selected to protect today's biodiversity may fail to do so in the future. One proposed approach to designing reserve networks that are robust to climate change involves protecting the diversity of abiotic conditions that in part determine species distributions and ecological processes. A set of abiotically diverse areas will likely support a diversity of ecological systems both today and into the future, although those two sets of systems might be dramatically different. Here, we demonstrate a conservation planning approach based on representing unique combinations of abiotic factors. We prioritize sites that represent the diversity of soils, topographies, and current climates of the Columbia Plateau. We then compare these sites to sites prioritized to protect current biodiversity. This comparison highlights places that are important for protecting both today's biodiversity and the diversity of abiotic factors that will likely determine biodiversity patterns in the future. It also highlights places where a reserve network designed solely to protect today's biodiversity would fail to capture the diversity of abiotic conditions and where such a network could be augmented to be more robust to climate-change impacts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3234274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32342742011-12-15 Systematic Conservation Planning in the Face of Climate Change: Bet-Hedging on the Columbia Plateau Schloss, Carrie A. Lawler, Joshua J. Larson, Eric R. Papendick, Hilary L. Case, Michael J. Evans, Daniel M. DeLap, Jack H. Langdon, Jesse G. R. Hall, Sonia A. McRae, Brad H. PLoS One Research Article Systematic conservation planning efforts typically focus on protecting current patterns of biodiversity. Climate change is poised to shift species distributions, reshuffle communities, and alter ecosystem functioning. In such a dynamic environment, lands selected to protect today's biodiversity may fail to do so in the future. One proposed approach to designing reserve networks that are robust to climate change involves protecting the diversity of abiotic conditions that in part determine species distributions and ecological processes. A set of abiotically diverse areas will likely support a diversity of ecological systems both today and into the future, although those two sets of systems might be dramatically different. Here, we demonstrate a conservation planning approach based on representing unique combinations of abiotic factors. We prioritize sites that represent the diversity of soils, topographies, and current climates of the Columbia Plateau. We then compare these sites to sites prioritized to protect current biodiversity. This comparison highlights places that are important for protecting both today's biodiversity and the diversity of abiotic factors that will likely determine biodiversity patterns in the future. It also highlights places where a reserve network designed solely to protect today's biodiversity would fail to capture the diversity of abiotic conditions and where such a network could be augmented to be more robust to climate-change impacts. Public Library of Science 2011-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3234274/ /pubmed/22174897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028788 Text en Schloss et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schloss, Carrie A.
Lawler, Joshua J.
Larson, Eric R.
Papendick, Hilary L.
Case, Michael J.
Evans, Daniel M.
DeLap, Jack H.
Langdon, Jesse G. R.
Hall, Sonia A.
McRae, Brad H.
Systematic Conservation Planning in the Face of Climate Change: Bet-Hedging on the Columbia Plateau
title Systematic Conservation Planning in the Face of Climate Change: Bet-Hedging on the Columbia Plateau
title_full Systematic Conservation Planning in the Face of Climate Change: Bet-Hedging on the Columbia Plateau
title_fullStr Systematic Conservation Planning in the Face of Climate Change: Bet-Hedging on the Columbia Plateau
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Conservation Planning in the Face of Climate Change: Bet-Hedging on the Columbia Plateau
title_short Systematic Conservation Planning in the Face of Climate Change: Bet-Hedging on the Columbia Plateau
title_sort systematic conservation planning in the face of climate change: bet-hedging on the columbia plateau
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028788
work_keys_str_mv AT schlosscarriea systematicconservationplanninginthefaceofclimatechangebethedgingonthecolumbiaplateau
AT lawlerjoshuaj systematicconservationplanninginthefaceofclimatechangebethedgingonthecolumbiaplateau
AT larsonericr systematicconservationplanninginthefaceofclimatechangebethedgingonthecolumbiaplateau
AT papendickhilaryl systematicconservationplanninginthefaceofclimatechangebethedgingonthecolumbiaplateau
AT casemichaelj systematicconservationplanninginthefaceofclimatechangebethedgingonthecolumbiaplateau
AT evansdanielm systematicconservationplanninginthefaceofclimatechangebethedgingonthecolumbiaplateau
AT delapjackh systematicconservationplanninginthefaceofclimatechangebethedgingonthecolumbiaplateau
AT langdonjessegr systematicconservationplanninginthefaceofclimatechangebethedgingonthecolumbiaplateau
AT hallsoniaa systematicconservationplanninginthefaceofclimatechangebethedgingonthecolumbiaplateau
AT mcraebradh systematicconservationplanninginthefaceofclimatechangebethedgingonthecolumbiaplateau