Cargando…
Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science
Within the realm of nano-, bio-, info- and cogno- (or NBIC) technosciences, the ‘power to change the world’ is often invoked. One could dismiss such formulations as ‘purely rhetorical’, interpret them as rhetorical and self-fulfilling or view them as an adequate depiction of one of the fundamental c...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22207830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10202-011-0101-2 |
_version_ | 1782218506894311424 |
---|---|
author | Kastenhofer, Karen Schmidt, Jan C. |
author_facet | Kastenhofer, Karen Schmidt, Jan C. |
author_sort | Kastenhofer, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Within the realm of nano-, bio-, info- and cogno- (or NBIC) technosciences, the ‘power to change the world’ is often invoked. One could dismiss such formulations as ‘purely rhetorical’, interpret them as rhetorical and self-fulfilling or view them as an adequate depiction of one of the fundamental characteristics of technoscience. In the latter case, a very specific nexus between science and technology, or, the epistemic and the constructionist realm is envisioned. The following paper focuses on this nexus drawing on theoretical conceptions as well as empirical material. It presents an overview of different technoscientific ways to ‘change the world’—via contemplation and representation, intervention and control, engineering, construction and creation. It further argues that the hybrid character of technoscience makes it difficult (if not impossible) to separate knowledge production from real world interventions and challenges current science and technology policy approaches in fundamental ways. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3234353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32343532011-12-27 Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science Kastenhofer, Karen Schmidt, Jan C. Poiesis Prax Focus Within the realm of nano-, bio-, info- and cogno- (or NBIC) technosciences, the ‘power to change the world’ is often invoked. One could dismiss such formulations as ‘purely rhetorical’, interpret them as rhetorical and self-fulfilling or view them as an adequate depiction of one of the fundamental characteristics of technoscience. In the latter case, a very specific nexus between science and technology, or, the epistemic and the constructionist realm is envisioned. The following paper focuses on this nexus drawing on theoretical conceptions as well as empirical material. It presents an overview of different technoscientific ways to ‘change the world’—via contemplation and representation, intervention and control, engineering, construction and creation. It further argues that the hybrid character of technoscience makes it difficult (if not impossible) to separate knowledge production from real world interventions and challenges current science and technology policy approaches in fundamental ways. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011-11-30 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3234353/ /pubmed/22207830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10202-011-0101-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Focus Kastenhofer, Karen Schmidt, Jan C. Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science |
title | Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science |
title_full | Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science |
title_fullStr | Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science |
title_full_unstemmed | Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science |
title_short | Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science |
title_sort | technoscientia est potentia?: contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science |
topic | Focus |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22207830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10202-011-0101-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kastenhoferkaren technoscientiaestpotentiacontemplativeinterventionistconstructionistandcreationistidealsintechnoscience AT schmidtjanc technoscientiaestpotentiacontemplativeinterventionistconstructionistandcreationistidealsintechnoscience |