Cargando…

Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science

Within the realm of nano-, bio-, info- and cogno- (or NBIC) technosciences, the ‘power to change the world’ is often invoked. One could dismiss such formulations as ‘purely rhetorical’, interpret them as rhetorical and self-fulfilling or view them as an adequate depiction of one of the fundamental c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kastenhofer, Karen, Schmidt, Jan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22207830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10202-011-0101-2
_version_ 1782218506894311424
author Kastenhofer, Karen
Schmidt, Jan C.
author_facet Kastenhofer, Karen
Schmidt, Jan C.
author_sort Kastenhofer, Karen
collection PubMed
description Within the realm of nano-, bio-, info- and cogno- (or NBIC) technosciences, the ‘power to change the world’ is often invoked. One could dismiss such formulations as ‘purely rhetorical’, interpret them as rhetorical and self-fulfilling or view them as an adequate depiction of one of the fundamental characteristics of technoscience. In the latter case, a very specific nexus between science and technology, or, the epistemic and the constructionist realm is envisioned. The following paper focuses on this nexus drawing on theoretical conceptions as well as empirical material. It presents an overview of different technoscientific ways to ‘change the world’—via contemplation and representation, intervention and control, engineering, construction and creation. It further argues that the hybrid character of technoscience makes it difficult (if not impossible) to separate knowledge production from real world interventions and challenges current science and technology policy approaches in fundamental ways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3234353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32343532011-12-27 Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science Kastenhofer, Karen Schmidt, Jan C. Poiesis Prax Focus Within the realm of nano-, bio-, info- and cogno- (or NBIC) technosciences, the ‘power to change the world’ is often invoked. One could dismiss such formulations as ‘purely rhetorical’, interpret them as rhetorical and self-fulfilling or view them as an adequate depiction of one of the fundamental characteristics of technoscience. In the latter case, a very specific nexus between science and technology, or, the epistemic and the constructionist realm is envisioned. The following paper focuses on this nexus drawing on theoretical conceptions as well as empirical material. It presents an overview of different technoscientific ways to ‘change the world’—via contemplation and representation, intervention and control, engineering, construction and creation. It further argues that the hybrid character of technoscience makes it difficult (if not impossible) to separate knowledge production from real world interventions and challenges current science and technology policy approaches in fundamental ways. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011-11-30 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3234353/ /pubmed/22207830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10202-011-0101-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Focus
Kastenhofer, Karen
Schmidt, Jan C.
Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science
title Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science
title_full Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science
title_fullStr Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science
title_full_unstemmed Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science
title_short Technoscientia est Potentia?: Contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science
title_sort technoscientia est potentia?: contemplative, interventionist, constructionist and creationist idea(l)s in (techno)science
topic Focus
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3234353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22207830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10202-011-0101-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kastenhoferkaren technoscientiaestpotentiacontemplativeinterventionistconstructionistandcreationistidealsintechnoscience
AT schmidtjanc technoscientiaestpotentiacontemplativeinterventionistconstructionistandcreationistidealsintechnoscience