Cargando…

Quantitative comparison of myocardial fiber structure between mice, rabbit, and sheep using diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND: Accurate interpretations of cardiac functions require precise structural models of the myocardium, but the latter is not available always and for all species. Although scaling or substitution of myocardial fiber information from alternate species has been used in cardiac functional model...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Healy, Lindsey J, Jiang, Yi, Hsu, Edward W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3235060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22117695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-74
_version_ 1782218553398657024
author Healy, Lindsey J
Jiang, Yi
Hsu, Edward W
author_facet Healy, Lindsey J
Jiang, Yi
Hsu, Edward W
author_sort Healy, Lindsey J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate interpretations of cardiac functions require precise structural models of the myocardium, but the latter is not available always and for all species. Although scaling or substitution of myocardial fiber information from alternate species has been used in cardiac functional modeling, the validity of such practice has not been tested. METHODS: Fixed mouse (n = 10), rabbit (n = 6), and sheep (n = 5) hearts underwent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). The myocardial structures in terms of the left ventricular fiber orientation helix angle index were quantitatively compared between the mouse rabbit and sheep hearts. RESULTS: The results show that significant fiber structural differences exist between any two of the three species. Specifically, the subepicardial fiber orientation, and the transmural range and linearity of fiber helix angles are significantly different between the mouse and either rabbit or sheep. Additionally, a significant difference was found between the transmural helix angle range between the rabbit and sheep. Across different circumferential regions of the heart, the fiber orientation was not found to be significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicates that myocardial structural differences exist between different size hearts. An immediate implication of the present findings for myocardial structural or functional modeling studies is that caution must be exercised when extrapolating myocardial structures from one species to another.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3235060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32350602011-12-10 Quantitative comparison of myocardial fiber structure between mice, rabbit, and sheep using diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance Healy, Lindsey J Jiang, Yi Hsu, Edward W J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Accurate interpretations of cardiac functions require precise structural models of the myocardium, but the latter is not available always and for all species. Although scaling or substitution of myocardial fiber information from alternate species has been used in cardiac functional modeling, the validity of such practice has not been tested. METHODS: Fixed mouse (n = 10), rabbit (n = 6), and sheep (n = 5) hearts underwent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). The myocardial structures in terms of the left ventricular fiber orientation helix angle index were quantitatively compared between the mouse rabbit and sheep hearts. RESULTS: The results show that significant fiber structural differences exist between any two of the three species. Specifically, the subepicardial fiber orientation, and the transmural range and linearity of fiber helix angles are significantly different between the mouse and either rabbit or sheep. Additionally, a significant difference was found between the transmural helix angle range between the rabbit and sheep. Across different circumferential regions of the heart, the fiber orientation was not found to be significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicates that myocardial structural differences exist between different size hearts. An immediate implication of the present findings for myocardial structural or functional modeling studies is that caution must be exercised when extrapolating myocardial structures from one species to another. BioMed Central 2011-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3235060/ /pubmed/22117695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-74 Text en Copyright ©2011 Healy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Healy, Lindsey J
Jiang, Yi
Hsu, Edward W
Quantitative comparison of myocardial fiber structure between mice, rabbit, and sheep using diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title Quantitative comparison of myocardial fiber structure between mice, rabbit, and sheep using diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full Quantitative comparison of myocardial fiber structure between mice, rabbit, and sheep using diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_fullStr Quantitative comparison of myocardial fiber structure between mice, rabbit, and sheep using diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative comparison of myocardial fiber structure between mice, rabbit, and sheep using diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_short Quantitative comparison of myocardial fiber structure between mice, rabbit, and sheep using diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_sort quantitative comparison of myocardial fiber structure between mice, rabbit, and sheep using diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3235060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22117695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-74
work_keys_str_mv AT healylindseyj quantitativecomparisonofmyocardialfiberstructurebetweenmicerabbitandsheepusingdiffusiontensorcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT jiangyi quantitativecomparisonofmyocardialfiberstructurebetweenmicerabbitandsheepusingdiffusiontensorcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT hsuedwardw quantitativecomparisonofmyocardialfiberstructurebetweenmicerabbitandsheepusingdiffusiontensorcardiovascularmagneticresonance