Cargando…

Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO

USCOM is an ultrasound-based method which has been accepted for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in various clinical conditions (USCOM, Ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring). The present study aimed at comparing the accuracy of the USCOM device with that of the thermodilution technique in patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horster, Sophia, Stemmler, Hans-Joachim, Strecker, Nina, Brettner, Florian, Hausmann, Andreas, Cnossen, Jitske, Parhofer, Klaus G., Nickel, Thomas, Geiger, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3235433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22191019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/270631
_version_ 1782218599057850368
author Horster, Sophia
Stemmler, Hans-Joachim
Strecker, Nina
Brettner, Florian
Hausmann, Andreas
Cnossen, Jitske
Parhofer, Klaus G.
Nickel, Thomas
Geiger, Sandra
author_facet Horster, Sophia
Stemmler, Hans-Joachim
Strecker, Nina
Brettner, Florian
Hausmann, Andreas
Cnossen, Jitske
Parhofer, Klaus G.
Nickel, Thomas
Geiger, Sandra
author_sort Horster, Sophia
collection PubMed
description USCOM is an ultrasound-based method which has been accepted for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in various clinical conditions (USCOM, Ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring). The present study aimed at comparing the accuracy of the USCOM device with that of the thermodilution technique in patients with septicemia. We conducted a prospective observational study in a medical but noncardiological ICU of a university hospital. Septic adult patients (median age 55 years, median SAPS-II-Score 43 points) on mechanical ventilation and catecholamine support were monitored with USCOM and PiCCO (n = 70). Seventy paired left-sided CO measurements (transaortic access = CO(US-A)) were obtained. The mean CO(US-A) were 6.55 l/min (±2.19) versus CO(PiCCO) 6.5 l/min (±2.18). The correlation coefficient was r = 0.89. Comparison by Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of −0.36 l/min (±0.99 l/min) leading to a mean percentage error of 29%. USCOM is a feasible and rapid method to evaluate CO in septic patients. USCOM does reliably represent CO values as compared to the reference technique based on thermodilution (PiCCO). It seems to be appropriate in situations where CO measurements are most pertinent to patient management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3235433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32354332011-12-21 Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO Horster, Sophia Stemmler, Hans-Joachim Strecker, Nina Brettner, Florian Hausmann, Andreas Cnossen, Jitske Parhofer, Klaus G. Nickel, Thomas Geiger, Sandra Crit Care Res Pract Clinical Study USCOM is an ultrasound-based method which has been accepted for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in various clinical conditions (USCOM, Ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring). The present study aimed at comparing the accuracy of the USCOM device with that of the thermodilution technique in patients with septicemia. We conducted a prospective observational study in a medical but noncardiological ICU of a university hospital. Septic adult patients (median age 55 years, median SAPS-II-Score 43 points) on mechanical ventilation and catecholamine support were monitored with USCOM and PiCCO (n = 70). Seventy paired left-sided CO measurements (transaortic access = CO(US-A)) were obtained. The mean CO(US-A) were 6.55 l/min (±2.19) versus CO(PiCCO) 6.5 l/min (±2.18). The correlation coefficient was r = 0.89. Comparison by Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of −0.36 l/min (±0.99 l/min) leading to a mean percentage error of 29%. USCOM is a feasible and rapid method to evaluate CO in septic patients. USCOM does reliably represent CO values as compared to the reference technique based on thermodilution (PiCCO). It seems to be appropriate in situations where CO measurements are most pertinent to patient management. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2011-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3235433/ /pubmed/22191019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/270631 Text en Copyright © 2012 Sophia Horster et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Horster, Sophia
Stemmler, Hans-Joachim
Strecker, Nina
Brettner, Florian
Hausmann, Andreas
Cnossen, Jitske
Parhofer, Klaus G.
Nickel, Thomas
Geiger, Sandra
Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO
title Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO
title_full Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO
title_fullStr Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO
title_short Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO
title_sort cardiac output measurements in septic patients: comparing the accuracy of uscom to picco
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3235433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22191019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/270631
work_keys_str_mv AT horstersophia cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco
AT stemmlerhansjoachim cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco
AT streckernina cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco
AT brettnerflorian cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco
AT hausmannandreas cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco
AT cnossenjitske cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco
AT parhoferklausg cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco
AT nickelthomas cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco
AT geigersandra cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco