Cargando…
Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO
USCOM is an ultrasound-based method which has been accepted for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in various clinical conditions (USCOM, Ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring). The present study aimed at comparing the accuracy of the USCOM device with that of the thermodilution technique in patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3235433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22191019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/270631 |
_version_ | 1782218599057850368 |
---|---|
author | Horster, Sophia Stemmler, Hans-Joachim Strecker, Nina Brettner, Florian Hausmann, Andreas Cnossen, Jitske Parhofer, Klaus G. Nickel, Thomas Geiger, Sandra |
author_facet | Horster, Sophia Stemmler, Hans-Joachim Strecker, Nina Brettner, Florian Hausmann, Andreas Cnossen, Jitske Parhofer, Klaus G. Nickel, Thomas Geiger, Sandra |
author_sort | Horster, Sophia |
collection | PubMed |
description | USCOM is an ultrasound-based method which has been accepted for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in various clinical conditions (USCOM, Ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring). The present study aimed at comparing the accuracy of the USCOM device with that of the thermodilution technique in patients with septicemia. We conducted a prospective observational study in a medical but noncardiological ICU of a university hospital. Septic adult patients (median age 55 years, median SAPS-II-Score 43 points) on mechanical ventilation and catecholamine support were monitored with USCOM and PiCCO (n = 70). Seventy paired left-sided CO measurements (transaortic access = CO(US-A)) were obtained. The mean CO(US-A) were 6.55 l/min (±2.19) versus CO(PiCCO) 6.5 l/min (±2.18). The correlation coefficient was r = 0.89. Comparison by Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of −0.36 l/min (±0.99 l/min) leading to a mean percentage error of 29%. USCOM is a feasible and rapid method to evaluate CO in septic patients. USCOM does reliably represent CO values as compared to the reference technique based on thermodilution (PiCCO). It seems to be appropriate in situations where CO measurements are most pertinent to patient management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3235433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32354332011-12-21 Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO Horster, Sophia Stemmler, Hans-Joachim Strecker, Nina Brettner, Florian Hausmann, Andreas Cnossen, Jitske Parhofer, Klaus G. Nickel, Thomas Geiger, Sandra Crit Care Res Pract Clinical Study USCOM is an ultrasound-based method which has been accepted for noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in various clinical conditions (USCOM, Ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring). The present study aimed at comparing the accuracy of the USCOM device with that of the thermodilution technique in patients with septicemia. We conducted a prospective observational study in a medical but noncardiological ICU of a university hospital. Septic adult patients (median age 55 years, median SAPS-II-Score 43 points) on mechanical ventilation and catecholamine support were monitored with USCOM and PiCCO (n = 70). Seventy paired left-sided CO measurements (transaortic access = CO(US-A)) were obtained. The mean CO(US-A) were 6.55 l/min (±2.19) versus CO(PiCCO) 6.5 l/min (±2.18). The correlation coefficient was r = 0.89. Comparison by Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of −0.36 l/min (±0.99 l/min) leading to a mean percentage error of 29%. USCOM is a feasible and rapid method to evaluate CO in septic patients. USCOM does reliably represent CO values as compared to the reference technique based on thermodilution (PiCCO). It seems to be appropriate in situations where CO measurements are most pertinent to patient management. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2011-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3235433/ /pubmed/22191019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/270631 Text en Copyright © 2012 Sophia Horster et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Horster, Sophia Stemmler, Hans-Joachim Strecker, Nina Brettner, Florian Hausmann, Andreas Cnossen, Jitske Parhofer, Klaus G. Nickel, Thomas Geiger, Sandra Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO |
title | Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO |
title_full | Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO |
title_fullStr | Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO |
title_short | Cardiac Output Measurements in Septic Patients: Comparing the Accuracy of USCOM to PiCCO |
title_sort | cardiac output measurements in septic patients: comparing the accuracy of uscom to picco |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3235433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22191019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/270631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horstersophia cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco AT stemmlerhansjoachim cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco AT streckernina cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco AT brettnerflorian cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco AT hausmannandreas cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco AT cnossenjitske cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco AT parhoferklausg cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco AT nickelthomas cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco AT geigersandra cardiacoutputmeasurementsinsepticpatientscomparingtheaccuracyofuscomtopicco |