Cargando…

REFOCUS Trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams

BACKGROUND: There is a consensus about the importance of 'recovery' in mental health services, but the evidence base is limited. METHODS/DESIGN: A two centre, cluster randomised controlled trial. Participants are community-based mental health teams, and service users aged 18-65 years with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slade, Mike, Bird, Victoria, Le Boutillier, Clair, Williams, Julie, McCrone, Paul, Leamy, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3235965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22112008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-185
_version_ 1782218664644182016
author Slade, Mike
Bird, Victoria
Le Boutillier, Clair
Williams, Julie
McCrone, Paul
Leamy, Mary
author_facet Slade, Mike
Bird, Victoria
Le Boutillier, Clair
Williams, Julie
McCrone, Paul
Leamy, Mary
author_sort Slade, Mike
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a consensus about the importance of 'recovery' in mental health services, but the evidence base is limited. METHODS/DESIGN: A two centre, cluster randomised controlled trial. Participants are community-based mental health teams, and service users aged 18-65 years with a primary clinical diagnosis of psychosis. In relation to the REFOCUS Manual researchintorecovery.com/refocus, which describes a 12-month, pro-recovery intervention based on the REFOCUS Model, the objectives are: (1) To establish the effectiveness of the intervention described in the REFOCUS Manual; (2) To validate the REFOCUS Model; (3) To establish and optimise trial parameters for the REFOCUS Manual; and (4) To understand the relationship between clinical outcomes and recovery outcomes. The hypothesis for the main study is that service users in the intervention arm will experience significantly greater increases in measures of personal recovery (as measured by the QPR) compared to service users receiving care from control teams. The hypothesis for the secondary study is that black service users in the intervention arm will experience significantly greater increases in measures of personal recovery (as measured by the QPR) and client satisfaction (as measured by the CSQ) compared to Black service users receiving care from control teams. The intervention comprises treatment as usual plus two components: recovery-promoting relationships and working practices. The control condition is treatment as usual. The primary outcme is the Process of Recovery Questionnaire (QPR). Secondary outcomes are satisfaction, Goal setting - Personal Primary Outcome, hope, well-being, empowerment, and quality of life. Primary outcomes for the secondary study will be QPR and satisfaction. Cost data will be estimated, and clinical outcomes will also be reported (symptomatology, need, social disability, functioning). 29 teams (15 intervention and 14 control) will be randomised. Within each team, 15 services users will be randomly chosen, giving a total sample of 435 service users (225 in intervention and 210 in control). Power for the main study: 336 service users will give power to detect a medium effect size of 0.4 (alpha 0.05, power = 0.8) on both QPR sub-scales. Power for the secondary study: 89 participants will give power to detect an effect size of 0.67 on both QPR sub-scales and on CSQ. A range of approaches are used to minimise bias, although service users and clinicians cannot be blinded. DISCUSSION: This cluster-RCT will evaluate a pro-recovery intervention in community mental health teams. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN02507940
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3235965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32359652011-12-13 REFOCUS Trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams Slade, Mike Bird, Victoria Le Boutillier, Clair Williams, Julie McCrone, Paul Leamy, Mary BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: There is a consensus about the importance of 'recovery' in mental health services, but the evidence base is limited. METHODS/DESIGN: A two centre, cluster randomised controlled trial. Participants are community-based mental health teams, and service users aged 18-65 years with a primary clinical diagnosis of psychosis. In relation to the REFOCUS Manual researchintorecovery.com/refocus, which describes a 12-month, pro-recovery intervention based on the REFOCUS Model, the objectives are: (1) To establish the effectiveness of the intervention described in the REFOCUS Manual; (2) To validate the REFOCUS Model; (3) To establish and optimise trial parameters for the REFOCUS Manual; and (4) To understand the relationship between clinical outcomes and recovery outcomes. The hypothesis for the main study is that service users in the intervention arm will experience significantly greater increases in measures of personal recovery (as measured by the QPR) compared to service users receiving care from control teams. The hypothesis for the secondary study is that black service users in the intervention arm will experience significantly greater increases in measures of personal recovery (as measured by the QPR) and client satisfaction (as measured by the CSQ) compared to Black service users receiving care from control teams. The intervention comprises treatment as usual plus two components: recovery-promoting relationships and working practices. The control condition is treatment as usual. The primary outcme is the Process of Recovery Questionnaire (QPR). Secondary outcomes are satisfaction, Goal setting - Personal Primary Outcome, hope, well-being, empowerment, and quality of life. Primary outcomes for the secondary study will be QPR and satisfaction. Cost data will be estimated, and clinical outcomes will also be reported (symptomatology, need, social disability, functioning). 29 teams (15 intervention and 14 control) will be randomised. Within each team, 15 services users will be randomly chosen, giving a total sample of 435 service users (225 in intervention and 210 in control). Power for the main study: 336 service users will give power to detect a medium effect size of 0.4 (alpha 0.05, power = 0.8) on both QPR sub-scales. Power for the secondary study: 89 participants will give power to detect an effect size of 0.67 on both QPR sub-scales and on CSQ. A range of approaches are used to minimise bias, although service users and clinicians cannot be blinded. DISCUSSION: This cluster-RCT will evaluate a pro-recovery intervention in community mental health teams. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: ISRCTN02507940 BioMed Central 2011-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3235965/ /pubmed/22112008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-185 Text en Copyright ©2011 Slade et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Slade, Mike
Bird, Victoria
Le Boutillier, Clair
Williams, Julie
McCrone, Paul
Leamy, Mary
REFOCUS Trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams
title REFOCUS Trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams
title_full REFOCUS Trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams
title_fullStr REFOCUS Trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams
title_full_unstemmed REFOCUS Trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams
title_short REFOCUS Trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams
title_sort refocus trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3235965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22112008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-185
work_keys_str_mv AT slademike refocustrialprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaprorecoveryinterventionwithincommunitybasedmentalhealthteams
AT birdvictoria refocustrialprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaprorecoveryinterventionwithincommunitybasedmentalhealthteams
AT leboutillierclair refocustrialprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaprorecoveryinterventionwithincommunitybasedmentalhealthteams
AT williamsjulie refocustrialprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaprorecoveryinterventionwithincommunitybasedmentalhealthteams
AT mccronepaul refocustrialprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaprorecoveryinterventionwithincommunitybasedmentalhealthteams
AT leamymary refocustrialprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialofaprorecoveryinterventionwithincommunitybasedmentalhealthteams