Cargando…

A population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scales

BACKGROUND: Screening instruments for mental disorders need to be short, engaging, and valid. Current screening instruments are usually questionnaire-based and may be opaque to the user. A prototype approach where individuals identify with a description of an individual with typical symptoms of depr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christensen, Helen, Batterham, Philip J, Grant, Janie Busby, Griffiths, Kathleen M, Mackinnon, Andrew J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3235985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22103584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-154
_version_ 1782218669237993472
author Christensen, Helen
Batterham, Philip J
Grant, Janie Busby
Griffiths, Kathleen M
Mackinnon, Andrew J
author_facet Christensen, Helen
Batterham, Philip J
Grant, Janie Busby
Griffiths, Kathleen M
Mackinnon, Andrew J
author_sort Christensen, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening instruments for mental disorders need to be short, engaging, and valid. Current screening instruments are usually questionnaire-based and may be opaque to the user. A prototype approach where individuals identify with a description of an individual with typical symptoms of depression, anxiety, social phobia or panic may be a shorter, faster and more acceptable method for screening. The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of four new prototype screeners for predicting depression and anxiety disorders and to compare their performance with existing scales. METHODS: Short and ultra-short prototypes were developed for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Panic Disorder (PD) and Social Phobia (SP). Prototypes were compared to typical short and ultra-short self-report screening scales, such as the Centre for Epidemiology Scale, CES-D and the GAD-7, and their short forms. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) version 6 [1] was used as the gold standard for obtaining clinical criteria through a telephone interview. From a population sample, 225 individuals who endorsed a prototype and 101 who did not were administered the MINI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for the short and ultra short prototypes and for the short and ultra short screening scales. RESULTS: The study found that the rates of endorsement of the prototypes were commensurate with prevalence estimates. The short-form and ultra short scales outperformed the short and ultra short prototypes for every disorder except GAD, where the GAD prototype outperformed the GAD 7. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that people may be able to self-identify generalised anxiety more accurately than depression based on a description of a prototypical case. However, levels of identification were lower than expected. Considerable benefits from this method of screening may ensue if our prototypes can be improved for Major Depressive Disorder, Social Phobia and Panic Disorder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3235985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32359852011-12-13 A population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scales Christensen, Helen Batterham, Philip J Grant, Janie Busby Griffiths, Kathleen M Mackinnon, Andrew J BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Screening instruments for mental disorders need to be short, engaging, and valid. Current screening instruments are usually questionnaire-based and may be opaque to the user. A prototype approach where individuals identify with a description of an individual with typical symptoms of depression, anxiety, social phobia or panic may be a shorter, faster and more acceptable method for screening. The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of four new prototype screeners for predicting depression and anxiety disorders and to compare their performance with existing scales. METHODS: Short and ultra-short prototypes were developed for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Panic Disorder (PD) and Social Phobia (SP). Prototypes were compared to typical short and ultra-short self-report screening scales, such as the Centre for Epidemiology Scale, CES-D and the GAD-7, and their short forms. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) version 6 [1] was used as the gold standard for obtaining clinical criteria through a telephone interview. From a population sample, 225 individuals who endorsed a prototype and 101 who did not were administered the MINI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for the short and ultra short prototypes and for the short and ultra short screening scales. RESULTS: The study found that the rates of endorsement of the prototypes were commensurate with prevalence estimates. The short-form and ultra short scales outperformed the short and ultra short prototypes for every disorder except GAD, where the GAD prototype outperformed the GAD 7. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that people may be able to self-identify generalised anxiety more accurately than depression based on a description of a prototypical case. However, levels of identification were lower than expected. Considerable benefits from this method of screening may ensue if our prototypes can be improved for Major Depressive Disorder, Social Phobia and Panic Disorder. BioMed Central 2011-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3235985/ /pubmed/22103584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-154 Text en Copyright ©2011 Christensen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Christensen, Helen
Batterham, Philip J
Grant, Janie Busby
Griffiths, Kathleen M
Mackinnon, Andrew J
A population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scales
title A population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scales
title_full A population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scales
title_fullStr A population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scales
title_full_unstemmed A population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scales
title_short A population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scales
title_sort population study comparing screening performance of prototypes for depression and anxiety with standard scales
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3235985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22103584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-154
work_keys_str_mv AT christensenhelen apopulationstudycomparingscreeningperformanceofprototypesfordepressionandanxietywithstandardscales
AT batterhamphilipj apopulationstudycomparingscreeningperformanceofprototypesfordepressionandanxietywithstandardscales
AT grantjaniebusby apopulationstudycomparingscreeningperformanceofprototypesfordepressionandanxietywithstandardscales
AT griffithskathleenm apopulationstudycomparingscreeningperformanceofprototypesfordepressionandanxietywithstandardscales
AT mackinnonandrewj apopulationstudycomparingscreeningperformanceofprototypesfordepressionandanxietywithstandardscales
AT christensenhelen populationstudycomparingscreeningperformanceofprototypesfordepressionandanxietywithstandardscales
AT batterhamphilipj populationstudycomparingscreeningperformanceofprototypesfordepressionandanxietywithstandardscales
AT grantjaniebusby populationstudycomparingscreeningperformanceofprototypesfordepressionandanxietywithstandardscales
AT griffithskathleenm populationstudycomparingscreeningperformanceofprototypesfordepressionandanxietywithstandardscales
AT mackinnonandrewj populationstudycomparingscreeningperformanceofprototypesfordepressionandanxietywithstandardscales