Cargando…
Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) includes the administration of aspirin. Current guidelines recommend chewing aspirin tablets to increase absorption. While this is intuitive, there are scant data supporting this recommendation. The purpose of this study is to assess which...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22224124 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.4.2222 |
_version_ | 1782218690969731072 |
---|---|
author | Nordt, Sean Patrick Clark, Richard F Castillo, Edward M Guss, David A |
author_facet | Nordt, Sean Patrick Clark, Richard F Castillo, Edward M Guss, David A |
author_sort | Nordt, Sean Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) includes the administration of aspirin. Current guidelines recommend chewing aspirin tablets to increase absorption. While this is intuitive, there are scant data supporting this recommendation. The purpose of this study is to assess which of 3 different aspirin formulations is most rapidly absorbed after ingestion. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, 3-way crossover volunteer study at a tertiary university medical center with human subjects 18 years or older. Fasted subjects were randomly assigned to receive aspirin 1,950 mg as (1) solid aspirin tablets swallowed whole, (2) solid aspirin tablet chewed then swallowed, or (3) a chewable aspirin formulation chewed and swallowed. Serum salicylate measurements were obtained over a period of 180 minutes. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. RESULTS: Thirteen males and 1 female completed all 3 arms of study. Peak serum salicylate concentrations were seen at 180 minutes in all groups. Mean peaks were 10.4, 11.3, and 12.2 mg/dL in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Mean area under the time concentration was 1,153, 1,401, and 1,743 mg-min/dL in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No measurable salicylate concentrations were seen in 6 subjects in group 1 at 60 minutes as compared to 1 subject in group 2. All subjects in group 3 had measurable levels at 45 minutes. There were no adverse effects in any of the subjects during the study period. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the chewable aspirin formulation achieved the most rapid rate of absorption. In addition, the chewable formulation absorption was more complete than the other formulations at 180 minutes. These data suggest that in the treatment of ACS, a chewable aspirin formulation may be preferable to solid tablet aspirin, either chewed or swallowed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3236147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32361472012-01-05 Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers Nordt, Sean Patrick Clark, Richard F Castillo, Edward M Guss, David A West J Emerg Med Clinical Practice INTRODUCTION: The treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) includes the administration of aspirin. Current guidelines recommend chewing aspirin tablets to increase absorption. While this is intuitive, there are scant data supporting this recommendation. The purpose of this study is to assess which of 3 different aspirin formulations is most rapidly absorbed after ingestion. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, 3-way crossover volunteer study at a tertiary university medical center with human subjects 18 years or older. Fasted subjects were randomly assigned to receive aspirin 1,950 mg as (1) solid aspirin tablets swallowed whole, (2) solid aspirin tablet chewed then swallowed, or (3) a chewable aspirin formulation chewed and swallowed. Serum salicylate measurements were obtained over a period of 180 minutes. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. RESULTS: Thirteen males and 1 female completed all 3 arms of study. Peak serum salicylate concentrations were seen at 180 minutes in all groups. Mean peaks were 10.4, 11.3, and 12.2 mg/dL in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Mean area under the time concentration was 1,153, 1,401, and 1,743 mg-min/dL in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No measurable salicylate concentrations were seen in 6 subjects in group 1 at 60 minutes as compared to 1 subject in group 2. All subjects in group 3 had measurable levels at 45 minutes. There were no adverse effects in any of the subjects during the study period. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the chewable aspirin formulation achieved the most rapid rate of absorption. In addition, the chewable formulation absorption was more complete than the other formulations at 180 minutes. These data suggest that in the treatment of ACS, a chewable aspirin formulation may be preferable to solid tablet aspirin, either chewed or swallowed. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2011-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3236147/ /pubmed/22224124 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.4.2222 Text en the authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Practice Nordt, Sean Patrick Clark, Richard F Castillo, Edward M Guss, David A Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers |
title | Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers |
title_full | Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers |
title_short | Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers |
title_sort | comparison of three aspirin formulations in human volunteers |
topic | Clinical Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22224124 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.4.2222 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nordtseanpatrick comparisonofthreeaspirinformulationsinhumanvolunteers AT clarkrichardf comparisonofthreeaspirinformulationsinhumanvolunteers AT castilloedwardm comparisonofthreeaspirinformulationsinhumanvolunteers AT gussdavida comparisonofthreeaspirinformulationsinhumanvolunteers |