Cargando…

Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) includes the administration of aspirin. Current guidelines recommend chewing aspirin tablets to increase absorption. While this is intuitive, there are scant data supporting this recommendation. The purpose of this study is to assess which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordt, Sean Patrick, Clark, Richard F, Castillo, Edward M, Guss, David A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22224124
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.4.2222
_version_ 1782218690969731072
author Nordt, Sean Patrick
Clark, Richard F
Castillo, Edward M
Guss, David A
author_facet Nordt, Sean Patrick
Clark, Richard F
Castillo, Edward M
Guss, David A
author_sort Nordt, Sean Patrick
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) includes the administration of aspirin. Current guidelines recommend chewing aspirin tablets to increase absorption. While this is intuitive, there are scant data supporting this recommendation. The purpose of this study is to assess which of 3 different aspirin formulations is most rapidly absorbed after ingestion. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, 3-way crossover volunteer study at a tertiary university medical center with human subjects 18 years or older. Fasted subjects were randomly assigned to receive aspirin 1,950 mg as (1) solid aspirin tablets swallowed whole, (2) solid aspirin tablet chewed then swallowed, or (3) a chewable aspirin formulation chewed and swallowed. Serum salicylate measurements were obtained over a period of 180 minutes. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. RESULTS: Thirteen males and 1 female completed all 3 arms of study. Peak serum salicylate concentrations were seen at 180 minutes in all groups. Mean peaks were 10.4, 11.3, and 12.2 mg/dL in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Mean area under the time concentration was 1,153, 1,401, and 1,743 mg-min/dL in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No measurable salicylate concentrations were seen in 6 subjects in group 1 at 60 minutes as compared to 1 subject in group 2. All subjects in group 3 had measurable levels at 45 minutes. There were no adverse effects in any of the subjects during the study period. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the chewable aspirin formulation achieved the most rapid rate of absorption. In addition, the chewable formulation absorption was more complete than the other formulations at 180 minutes. These data suggest that in the treatment of ACS, a chewable aspirin formulation may be preferable to solid tablet aspirin, either chewed or swallowed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3236147
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32361472012-01-05 Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers Nordt, Sean Patrick Clark, Richard F Castillo, Edward M Guss, David A West J Emerg Med Clinical Practice INTRODUCTION: The treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) includes the administration of aspirin. Current guidelines recommend chewing aspirin tablets to increase absorption. While this is intuitive, there are scant data supporting this recommendation. The purpose of this study is to assess which of 3 different aspirin formulations is most rapidly absorbed after ingestion. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, 3-way crossover volunteer study at a tertiary university medical center with human subjects 18 years or older. Fasted subjects were randomly assigned to receive aspirin 1,950 mg as (1) solid aspirin tablets swallowed whole, (2) solid aspirin tablet chewed then swallowed, or (3) a chewable aspirin formulation chewed and swallowed. Serum salicylate measurements were obtained over a period of 180 minutes. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. RESULTS: Thirteen males and 1 female completed all 3 arms of study. Peak serum salicylate concentrations were seen at 180 minutes in all groups. Mean peaks were 10.4, 11.3, and 12.2 mg/dL in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Mean area under the time concentration was 1,153, 1,401, and 1,743 mg-min/dL in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. No measurable salicylate concentrations were seen in 6 subjects in group 1 at 60 minutes as compared to 1 subject in group 2. All subjects in group 3 had measurable levels at 45 minutes. There were no adverse effects in any of the subjects during the study period. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the chewable aspirin formulation achieved the most rapid rate of absorption. In addition, the chewable formulation absorption was more complete than the other formulations at 180 minutes. These data suggest that in the treatment of ACS, a chewable aspirin formulation may be preferable to solid tablet aspirin, either chewed or swallowed. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2011-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3236147/ /pubmed/22224124 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.4.2222 Text en the authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Practice
Nordt, Sean Patrick
Clark, Richard F
Castillo, Edward M
Guss, David A
Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers
title Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers
title_full Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers
title_fullStr Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers
title_short Comparison of Three Aspirin Formulations in Human Volunteers
title_sort comparison of three aspirin formulations in human volunteers
topic Clinical Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236147/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22224124
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.4.2222
work_keys_str_mv AT nordtseanpatrick comparisonofthreeaspirinformulationsinhumanvolunteers
AT clarkrichardf comparisonofthreeaspirinformulationsinhumanvolunteers
AT castilloedwardm comparisonofthreeaspirinformulationsinhumanvolunteers
AT gussdavida comparisonofthreeaspirinformulationsinhumanvolunteers