Cargando…

Protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial: cost-effectiveness of education and activation, a rehabilitation program, and the legislated standard of care for acute whiplash injury in Ontario

BACKGROUND: Whiplash injury affects 83% of persons in a traffic collision and leads to whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). A major challenge facing health care decision makers is identifying cost-effective interventions due to lack of economic evidence. Our objective is to compare the cost-effectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Velde, Gabrielle, Côté, Pierre, Bayoumi, Ahmed M, Cassidy, J David, Boyle, Eleanor, Shearer, Heather M, Stupar, Maja, Jacobs, Craig, Ammendolia, Carlo, Carette, Simon, van Tulder, Maurits
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21794155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-594
_version_ 1782218716403990528
author van der Velde, Gabrielle
Côté, Pierre
Bayoumi, Ahmed M
Cassidy, J David
Boyle, Eleanor
Shearer, Heather M
Stupar, Maja
Jacobs, Craig
Ammendolia, Carlo
Carette, Simon
van Tulder, Maurits
author_facet van der Velde, Gabrielle
Côté, Pierre
Bayoumi, Ahmed M
Cassidy, J David
Boyle, Eleanor
Shearer, Heather M
Stupar, Maja
Jacobs, Craig
Ammendolia, Carlo
Carette, Simon
van Tulder, Maurits
author_sort van der Velde, Gabrielle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whiplash injury affects 83% of persons in a traffic collision and leads to whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). A major challenge facing health care decision makers is identifying cost-effective interventions due to lack of economic evidence. Our objective is to compare the cost-effectiveness of: 1) physician-based education and activation, 2) a rehabilitation program developed by Aviva Canada (a group of property and casualty insurance providers), and 3) the legislated standard of care in the Canadian province of Ontario: the Pre-approved Framework Guideline for Whiplash developed by the Financial Services Commission of Ontario. METHODS/DESIGN: The economic evaluation will use participant-level data from the University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial and will be conducted from the societal perspective over the trial's one-year follow-up. Resource use (costs) will include all health care goods and services, and benefits provided during the trial's 1-year follow-up. The primary health effect will be the quality-adjusted life year. We will identify the most cost-effective intervention using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental net-benefit. Confidence ellipses and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves will represent uncertainty around these statistics, respectively. A budget impact analysis will assess the total annual impact of replacing the current legislated standard of care with each of the other interventions. An expected value of perfect information will determine the maximum research expenditure Canadian society should be willing to pay for, and inform priority setting in, research of WAD management. DISCUSSION: Results will provide health care decision makers with much needed economic evidence on common interventions for acute whiplash management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00546806 [Trial registry date: October 18, 2007; Date first patient was randomized: February 27, 2008]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3236308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32363082011-12-14 Protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial: cost-effectiveness of education and activation, a rehabilitation program, and the legislated standard of care for acute whiplash injury in Ontario van der Velde, Gabrielle Côté, Pierre Bayoumi, Ahmed M Cassidy, J David Boyle, Eleanor Shearer, Heather M Stupar, Maja Jacobs, Craig Ammendolia, Carlo Carette, Simon van Tulder, Maurits BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Whiplash injury affects 83% of persons in a traffic collision and leads to whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). A major challenge facing health care decision makers is identifying cost-effective interventions due to lack of economic evidence. Our objective is to compare the cost-effectiveness of: 1) physician-based education and activation, 2) a rehabilitation program developed by Aviva Canada (a group of property and casualty insurance providers), and 3) the legislated standard of care in the Canadian province of Ontario: the Pre-approved Framework Guideline for Whiplash developed by the Financial Services Commission of Ontario. METHODS/DESIGN: The economic evaluation will use participant-level data from the University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial and will be conducted from the societal perspective over the trial's one-year follow-up. Resource use (costs) will include all health care goods and services, and benefits provided during the trial's 1-year follow-up. The primary health effect will be the quality-adjusted life year. We will identify the most cost-effective intervention using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental net-benefit. Confidence ellipses and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves will represent uncertainty around these statistics, respectively. A budget impact analysis will assess the total annual impact of replacing the current legislated standard of care with each of the other interventions. An expected value of perfect information will determine the maximum research expenditure Canadian society should be willing to pay for, and inform priority setting in, research of WAD management. DISCUSSION: Results will provide health care decision makers with much needed economic evidence on common interventions for acute whiplash management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00546806 [Trial registry date: October 18, 2007; Date first patient was randomized: February 27, 2008] BioMed Central 2011-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3236308/ /pubmed/21794155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-594 Text en Copyright ©2011 van der Velde et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van der Velde, Gabrielle
Côté, Pierre
Bayoumi, Ahmed M
Cassidy, J David
Boyle, Eleanor
Shearer, Heather M
Stupar, Maja
Jacobs, Craig
Ammendolia, Carlo
Carette, Simon
van Tulder, Maurits
Protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial: cost-effectiveness of education and activation, a rehabilitation program, and the legislated standard of care for acute whiplash injury in Ontario
title Protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial: cost-effectiveness of education and activation, a rehabilitation program, and the legislated standard of care for acute whiplash injury in Ontario
title_full Protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial: cost-effectiveness of education and activation, a rehabilitation program, and the legislated standard of care for acute whiplash injury in Ontario
title_fullStr Protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial: cost-effectiveness of education and activation, a rehabilitation program, and the legislated standard of care for acute whiplash injury in Ontario
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial: cost-effectiveness of education and activation, a rehabilitation program, and the legislated standard of care for acute whiplash injury in Ontario
title_short Protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the University Health Network Whiplash Intervention Trial: cost-effectiveness of education and activation, a rehabilitation program, and the legislated standard of care for acute whiplash injury in Ontario
title_sort protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the university health network whiplash intervention trial: cost-effectiveness of education and activation, a rehabilitation program, and the legislated standard of care for acute whiplash injury in ontario
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21794155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-594
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderveldegabrielle protocolforaneconomicevaluationalongsidetheuniversityhealthnetworkwhiplashinterventiontrialcosteffectivenessofeducationandactivationarehabilitationprogramandthelegislatedstandardofcareforacutewhiplashinjuryinontario
AT cotepierre protocolforaneconomicevaluationalongsidetheuniversityhealthnetworkwhiplashinterventiontrialcosteffectivenessofeducationandactivationarehabilitationprogramandthelegislatedstandardofcareforacutewhiplashinjuryinontario
AT bayoumiahmedm protocolforaneconomicevaluationalongsidetheuniversityhealthnetworkwhiplashinterventiontrialcosteffectivenessofeducationandactivationarehabilitationprogramandthelegislatedstandardofcareforacutewhiplashinjuryinontario
AT cassidyjdavid protocolforaneconomicevaluationalongsidetheuniversityhealthnetworkwhiplashinterventiontrialcosteffectivenessofeducationandactivationarehabilitationprogramandthelegislatedstandardofcareforacutewhiplashinjuryinontario
AT boyleeleanor protocolforaneconomicevaluationalongsidetheuniversityhealthnetworkwhiplashinterventiontrialcosteffectivenessofeducationandactivationarehabilitationprogramandthelegislatedstandardofcareforacutewhiplashinjuryinontario
AT shearerheatherm protocolforaneconomicevaluationalongsidetheuniversityhealthnetworkwhiplashinterventiontrialcosteffectivenessofeducationandactivationarehabilitationprogramandthelegislatedstandardofcareforacutewhiplashinjuryinontario
AT stuparmaja protocolforaneconomicevaluationalongsidetheuniversityhealthnetworkwhiplashinterventiontrialcosteffectivenessofeducationandactivationarehabilitationprogramandthelegislatedstandardofcareforacutewhiplashinjuryinontario
AT jacobscraig protocolforaneconomicevaluationalongsidetheuniversityhealthnetworkwhiplashinterventiontrialcosteffectivenessofeducationandactivationarehabilitationprogramandthelegislatedstandardofcareforacutewhiplashinjuryinontario
AT ammendoliacarlo protocolforaneconomicevaluationalongsidetheuniversityhealthnetworkwhiplashinterventiontrialcosteffectivenessofeducationandactivationarehabilitationprogramandthelegislatedstandardofcareforacutewhiplashinjuryinontario
AT carettesimon protocolforaneconomicevaluationalongsidetheuniversityhealthnetworkwhiplashinterventiontrialcosteffectivenessofeducationandactivationarehabilitationprogramandthelegislatedstandardofcareforacutewhiplashinjuryinontario
AT vantuldermaurits protocolforaneconomicevaluationalongsidetheuniversityhealthnetworkwhiplashinterventiontrialcosteffectivenessofeducationandactivationarehabilitationprogramandthelegislatedstandardofcareforacutewhiplashinjuryinontario