Cargando…

Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: An Updated Systematic Review

The introduction of da Vinci Robotic Surgery to the field of Gynecology has resulted in large changes in surgical management. The robotic platform allows less experienced laparoscopic surgeons to perform more complex procedures. In general gynecology and reproductive gynecology, the robot is being i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinberg, Lori, Rao, Sanjay, Escobar, Pedro F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22190948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/852061
_version_ 1782218734227685376
author Weinberg, Lori
Rao, Sanjay
Escobar, Pedro F.
author_facet Weinberg, Lori
Rao, Sanjay
Escobar, Pedro F.
author_sort Weinberg, Lori
collection PubMed
description The introduction of da Vinci Robotic Surgery to the field of Gynecology has resulted in large changes in surgical management. The robotic platform allows less experienced laparoscopic surgeons to perform more complex procedures. In general gynecology and reproductive gynecology, the robot is being increasingly used for procedures such as hysterectomies, myomectomies, adnexal surgery, and tubal anastomosis. Among urogynecology the robot is being utilized for sacrocolopexies. In the field of gynecologic oncology, the robot is being increasingly used for hysterectomies and lymphadenectomies in oncologic diseases. Despite the rapid and widespread adoption of robotic surgery in gynecology, there are no randomized trials comparing its efficacy and safety to other traditional surgical approaches. Our aim is to update previously published reviews with a focus on only comparative observational studies. We determined that, with the right amount of training and skill, along with appropriate patient selection, robotic surgery can be highly advantageous. Patients will likely have less blood loss, less post-operative pain, faster recoveries, and fewer complications compared to open surgery and potentially even laparoscopy. However, until larger, well-designed observational studies or randomized control trials are completed which report long-term outcomes, we cannot definitively state the superiority of robotic surgery over other surgical methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3236390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32363902011-12-21 Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: An Updated Systematic Review Weinberg, Lori Rao, Sanjay Escobar, Pedro F. Obstet Gynecol Int Review Article The introduction of da Vinci Robotic Surgery to the field of Gynecology has resulted in large changes in surgical management. The robotic platform allows less experienced laparoscopic surgeons to perform more complex procedures. In general gynecology and reproductive gynecology, the robot is being increasingly used for procedures such as hysterectomies, myomectomies, adnexal surgery, and tubal anastomosis. Among urogynecology the robot is being utilized for sacrocolopexies. In the field of gynecologic oncology, the robot is being increasingly used for hysterectomies and lymphadenectomies in oncologic diseases. Despite the rapid and widespread adoption of robotic surgery in gynecology, there are no randomized trials comparing its efficacy and safety to other traditional surgical approaches. Our aim is to update previously published reviews with a focus on only comparative observational studies. We determined that, with the right amount of training and skill, along with appropriate patient selection, robotic surgery can be highly advantageous. Patients will likely have less blood loss, less post-operative pain, faster recoveries, and fewer complications compared to open surgery and potentially even laparoscopy. However, until larger, well-designed observational studies or randomized control trials are completed which report long-term outcomes, we cannot definitively state the superiority of robotic surgery over other surgical methods. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3236390/ /pubmed/22190948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/852061 Text en Copyright © 2011 Lori Weinberg et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Weinberg, Lori
Rao, Sanjay
Escobar, Pedro F.
Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: An Updated Systematic Review
title Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: An Updated Systematic Review
title_full Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: An Updated Systematic Review
title_fullStr Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: An Updated Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: An Updated Systematic Review
title_short Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: An Updated Systematic Review
title_sort robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22190948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/852061
work_keys_str_mv AT weinberglori roboticsurgeryingynecologyanupdatedsystematicreview
AT raosanjay roboticsurgeryingynecologyanupdatedsystematicreview
AT escobarpedrof roboticsurgeryingynecologyanupdatedsystematicreview