Cargando…
Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background. Hospitalization accounts for 70% of heart failure (HF) costs; readmission rates at 30 days are 24% and rise to 50% by 90 days. Agencies anticipate that telehomecare will provide the close monitoring necessary to prevent HF readmissions. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trial to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22187551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/540138 |
_version_ | 1782218748825960448 |
---|---|
author | Bowles, Kathryn H. Hanlon, Alexandra L. Glick, Henry A. Naylor, Mary D. O'Connor, Melissa Riegel, Barbara Shih, Nai-Wei Weiner, Mark G. |
author_facet | Bowles, Kathryn H. Hanlon, Alexandra L. Glick, Henry A. Naylor, Mary D. O'Connor, Melissa Riegel, Barbara Shih, Nai-Wei Weiner, Mark G. |
author_sort | Bowles, Kathryn H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Hospitalization accounts for 70% of heart failure (HF) costs; readmission rates at 30 days are 24% and rise to 50% by 90 days. Agencies anticipate that telehomecare will provide the close monitoring necessary to prevent HF readmissions. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trial to compare a telehomecare intervention for patients 55 and older following hospital discharge for HF to usual skilled home care. Primary endpoints were 30- and 60-day all-cause and HF readmission, hospital days, and time to readmission or death. Secondary outcomes were access to care, emergency department (ED) use, and satisfaction with care. All-cause readmissions at 30 days (16% versus 19%) and over six months (46% versus 52%) were lower in the telehomecare group but were not statistically significant. Access to care and satisfaction were significantly higher for the telehomecare patients, including the number of in-person visits and days in home care. Conclusions. Patient acceptance of the technology and current home care policies and processes of care were barriers to gaining clinical effectiveness and efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3236461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32364612011-12-20 Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial Bowles, Kathryn H. Hanlon, Alexandra L. Glick, Henry A. Naylor, Mary D. O'Connor, Melissa Riegel, Barbara Shih, Nai-Wei Weiner, Mark G. Int J Telemed Appl Research Article Background. Hospitalization accounts for 70% of heart failure (HF) costs; readmission rates at 30 days are 24% and rise to 50% by 90 days. Agencies anticipate that telehomecare will provide the close monitoring necessary to prevent HF readmissions. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trial to compare a telehomecare intervention for patients 55 and older following hospital discharge for HF to usual skilled home care. Primary endpoints were 30- and 60-day all-cause and HF readmission, hospital days, and time to readmission or death. Secondary outcomes were access to care, emergency department (ED) use, and satisfaction with care. All-cause readmissions at 30 days (16% versus 19%) and over six months (46% versus 52%) were lower in the telehomecare group but were not statistically significant. Access to care and satisfaction were significantly higher for the telehomecare patients, including the number of in-person visits and days in home care. Conclusions. Patient acceptance of the technology and current home care policies and processes of care were barriers to gaining clinical effectiveness and efficiency. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3236461/ /pubmed/22187551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/540138 Text en Copyright © 2011 Kathryn H. Bowles et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bowles, Kathryn H. Hanlon, Alexandra L. Glick, Henry A. Naylor, Mary D. O'Connor, Melissa Riegel, Barbara Shih, Nai-Wei Weiner, Mark G. Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | clinical effectiveness, access to, and satisfaction with care using a telehomecare substitution intervention: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22187551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/540138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowleskathrynh clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hanlonalexandral clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT glickhenrya clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT naylormaryd clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT oconnormelissa clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT riegelbarbara clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shihnaiwei clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weinermarkg clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial |