Cargando…

Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background. Hospitalization accounts for 70% of heart failure (HF) costs; readmission rates at 30 days are 24% and rise to 50% by 90 days. Agencies anticipate that telehomecare will provide the close monitoring necessary to prevent HF readmissions. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trial to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowles, Kathryn H., Hanlon, Alexandra L., Glick, Henry A., Naylor, Mary D., O'Connor, Melissa, Riegel, Barbara, Shih, Nai-Wei, Weiner, Mark G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22187551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/540138
_version_ 1782218748825960448
author Bowles, Kathryn H.
Hanlon, Alexandra L.
Glick, Henry A.
Naylor, Mary D.
O'Connor, Melissa
Riegel, Barbara
Shih, Nai-Wei
Weiner, Mark G.
author_facet Bowles, Kathryn H.
Hanlon, Alexandra L.
Glick, Henry A.
Naylor, Mary D.
O'Connor, Melissa
Riegel, Barbara
Shih, Nai-Wei
Weiner, Mark G.
author_sort Bowles, Kathryn H.
collection PubMed
description Background. Hospitalization accounts for 70% of heart failure (HF) costs; readmission rates at 30 days are 24% and rise to 50% by 90 days. Agencies anticipate that telehomecare will provide the close monitoring necessary to prevent HF readmissions. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trial to compare a telehomecare intervention for patients 55 and older following hospital discharge for HF to usual skilled home care. Primary endpoints were 30- and 60-day all-cause and HF readmission, hospital days, and time to readmission or death. Secondary outcomes were access to care, emergency department (ED) use, and satisfaction with care. All-cause readmissions at 30 days (16% versus 19%) and over six months (46% versus 52%) were lower in the telehomecare group but were not statistically significant. Access to care and satisfaction were significantly higher for the telehomecare patients, including the number of in-person visits and days in home care. Conclusions. Patient acceptance of the technology and current home care policies and processes of care were barriers to gaining clinical effectiveness and efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3236461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32364612011-12-20 Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial Bowles, Kathryn H. Hanlon, Alexandra L. Glick, Henry A. Naylor, Mary D. O'Connor, Melissa Riegel, Barbara Shih, Nai-Wei Weiner, Mark G. Int J Telemed Appl Research Article Background. Hospitalization accounts for 70% of heart failure (HF) costs; readmission rates at 30 days are 24% and rise to 50% by 90 days. Agencies anticipate that telehomecare will provide the close monitoring necessary to prevent HF readmissions. Methods and Results. Randomized controlled trial to compare a telehomecare intervention for patients 55 and older following hospital discharge for HF to usual skilled home care. Primary endpoints were 30- and 60-day all-cause and HF readmission, hospital days, and time to readmission or death. Secondary outcomes were access to care, emergency department (ED) use, and satisfaction with care. All-cause readmissions at 30 days (16% versus 19%) and over six months (46% versus 52%) were lower in the telehomecare group but were not statistically significant. Access to care and satisfaction were significantly higher for the telehomecare patients, including the number of in-person visits and days in home care. Conclusions. Patient acceptance of the technology and current home care policies and processes of care were barriers to gaining clinical effectiveness and efficiency. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3236461/ /pubmed/22187551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/540138 Text en Copyright © 2011 Kathryn H. Bowles et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bowles, Kathryn H.
Hanlon, Alexandra L.
Glick, Henry A.
Naylor, Mary D.
O'Connor, Melissa
Riegel, Barbara
Shih, Nai-Wei
Weiner, Mark G.
Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Clinical Effectiveness, Access to, and Satisfaction with Care Using a Telehomecare Substitution Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort clinical effectiveness, access to, and satisfaction with care using a telehomecare substitution intervention: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22187551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/540138
work_keys_str_mv AT bowleskathrynh clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hanlonalexandral clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT glickhenrya clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT naylormaryd clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT oconnormelissa clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT riegelbarbara clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shihnaiwei clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weinermarkg clinicaleffectivenessaccesstoandsatisfactionwithcareusingatelehomecaresubstitutioninterventionarandomizedcontrolledtrial