Cargando…
Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph
BACKGROUND: To assess a pulmonary function change over time the mass flow sensor and the pneumotachograph are widely used in commercially available instruments. However, the smallest detectable change for both devices has never been compared. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the smal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21276230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-23 |
_version_ | 1782218762416553984 |
---|---|
author | Groepenhoff, Herman Terwee, Caroline B Jak, Patrick MC Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton |
author_facet | Groepenhoff, Herman Terwee, Caroline B Jak, Patrick MC Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton |
author_sort | Groepenhoff, Herman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To assess a pulmonary function change over time the mass flow sensor and the pneumotachograph are widely used in commercially available instruments. However, the smallest detectable change for both devices has never been compared. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the smallest detectable change in vital capacity (VC) and single-breath diffusion parameters measured by mass flow sensor and or pneumotachograph. METHOD: In 28 healthy pulmonary function technicians VC, transfer factor for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and alveolar volume (VA) was repeatedly (10×) measured. The smallest detectable change was calculated by 1.96 x Standard Error of Measurement ×√2. FINDINGS: The mean (range) of the smallest detectable change measured by mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph respectively, were for VC (in Liter): 0.53 (0.46-0.65); 0.25 (0.17-0.36) (p = 0.04), DLCO (in mmol*kPa(-1)*min(-1)): 1.53 (1.26-1.7); 1.18 (0.84-1.39) (p = 0.07), VA (in Liter): 0.66. (0.53-0.82); 0.43 (0.34-0.53) (p = 0.04) and DLCO/VA (in mmol*kPa(-1)*min(-1)*L(-1)): 0.22 (0.19-0.28); 0.19 (0.14-0.22) (p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Smallest detectable significant change in VC and VA as measured by pneumotachograph are smaller than by mass flow sensor. Therefore, the pneumotachograph is the preferred instrument to estimate lung volume change over time in individual patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3236536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32365362011-12-14 Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph Groepenhoff, Herman Terwee, Caroline B Jak, Patrick MC Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: To assess a pulmonary function change over time the mass flow sensor and the pneumotachograph are widely used in commercially available instruments. However, the smallest detectable change for both devices has never been compared. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the smallest detectable change in vital capacity (VC) and single-breath diffusion parameters measured by mass flow sensor and or pneumotachograph. METHOD: In 28 healthy pulmonary function technicians VC, transfer factor for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and alveolar volume (VA) was repeatedly (10×) measured. The smallest detectable change was calculated by 1.96 x Standard Error of Measurement ×√2. FINDINGS: The mean (range) of the smallest detectable change measured by mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph respectively, were for VC (in Liter): 0.53 (0.46-0.65); 0.25 (0.17-0.36) (p = 0.04), DLCO (in mmol*kPa(-1)*min(-1)): 1.53 (1.26-1.7); 1.18 (0.84-1.39) (p = 0.07), VA (in Liter): 0.66. (0.53-0.82); 0.43 (0.34-0.53) (p = 0.04) and DLCO/VA (in mmol*kPa(-1)*min(-1)*L(-1)): 0.22 (0.19-0.28); 0.19 (0.14-0.22) (p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Smallest detectable significant change in VC and VA as measured by pneumotachograph are smaller than by mass flow sensor. Therefore, the pneumotachograph is the preferred instrument to estimate lung volume change over time in individual patients. BioMed Central 2011-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3236536/ /pubmed/21276230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-23 Text en Copyright ©2011 Groepenhoff et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Groepenhoff, Herman Terwee, Caroline B Jak, Patrick MC Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph |
title | Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph |
title_full | Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph |
title_fullStr | Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph |
title_full_unstemmed | Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph |
title_short | Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph |
title_sort | smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21276230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT groepenhoffherman smallestdetectablechangeinvolumediffersbetweenmassflowsensorandpneumotachograph AT terweecarolineb smallestdetectablechangeinvolumediffersbetweenmassflowsensorandpneumotachograph AT jakpatrickmc smallestdetectablechangeinvolumediffersbetweenmassflowsensorandpneumotachograph AT vonknoordegraafanton smallestdetectablechangeinvolumediffersbetweenmassflowsensorandpneumotachograph |