Cargando…

Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph

BACKGROUND: To assess a pulmonary function change over time the mass flow sensor and the pneumotachograph are widely used in commercially available instruments. However, the smallest detectable change for both devices has never been compared. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the smal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Groepenhoff, Herman, Terwee, Caroline B, Jak, Patrick MC, Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21276230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-23
_version_ 1782218762416553984
author Groepenhoff, Herman
Terwee, Caroline B
Jak, Patrick MC
Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton
author_facet Groepenhoff, Herman
Terwee, Caroline B
Jak, Patrick MC
Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton
author_sort Groepenhoff, Herman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess a pulmonary function change over time the mass flow sensor and the pneumotachograph are widely used in commercially available instruments. However, the smallest detectable change for both devices has never been compared. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the smallest detectable change in vital capacity (VC) and single-breath diffusion parameters measured by mass flow sensor and or pneumotachograph. METHOD: In 28 healthy pulmonary function technicians VC, transfer factor for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and alveolar volume (VA) was repeatedly (10×) measured. The smallest detectable change was calculated by 1.96 x Standard Error of Measurement ×√2. FINDINGS: The mean (range) of the smallest detectable change measured by mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph respectively, were for VC (in Liter): 0.53 (0.46-0.65); 0.25 (0.17-0.36) (p = 0.04), DLCO (in mmol*kPa(-1)*min(-1)): 1.53 (1.26-1.7); 1.18 (0.84-1.39) (p = 0.07), VA (in Liter): 0.66. (0.53-0.82); 0.43 (0.34-0.53) (p = 0.04) and DLCO/VA (in mmol*kPa(-1)*min(-1)*L(-1)): 0.22 (0.19-0.28); 0.19 (0.14-0.22) (p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Smallest detectable significant change in VC and VA as measured by pneumotachograph are smaller than by mass flow sensor. Therefore, the pneumotachograph is the preferred instrument to estimate lung volume change over time in individual patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3236536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32365362011-12-14 Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph Groepenhoff, Herman Terwee, Caroline B Jak, Patrick MC Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: To assess a pulmonary function change over time the mass flow sensor and the pneumotachograph are widely used in commercially available instruments. However, the smallest detectable change for both devices has never been compared. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the smallest detectable change in vital capacity (VC) and single-breath diffusion parameters measured by mass flow sensor and or pneumotachograph. METHOD: In 28 healthy pulmonary function technicians VC, transfer factor for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and alveolar volume (VA) was repeatedly (10×) measured. The smallest detectable change was calculated by 1.96 x Standard Error of Measurement ×√2. FINDINGS: The mean (range) of the smallest detectable change measured by mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph respectively, were for VC (in Liter): 0.53 (0.46-0.65); 0.25 (0.17-0.36) (p = 0.04), DLCO (in mmol*kPa(-1)*min(-1)): 1.53 (1.26-1.7); 1.18 (0.84-1.39) (p = 0.07), VA (in Liter): 0.66. (0.53-0.82); 0.43 (0.34-0.53) (p = 0.04) and DLCO/VA (in mmol*kPa(-1)*min(-1)*L(-1)): 0.22 (0.19-0.28); 0.19 (0.14-0.22) (p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Smallest detectable significant change in VC and VA as measured by pneumotachograph are smaller than by mass flow sensor. Therefore, the pneumotachograph is the preferred instrument to estimate lung volume change over time in individual patients. BioMed Central 2011-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3236536/ /pubmed/21276230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-23 Text en Copyright ©2011 Groepenhoff et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Groepenhoff, Herman
Terwee, Caroline B
Jak, Patrick MC
Vonk-Noordegraaf, Anton
Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph
title Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph
title_full Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph
title_fullStr Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph
title_full_unstemmed Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph
title_short Smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph
title_sort smallest detectable change in volume differs between mass flow sensor and pneumotachograph
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21276230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-23
work_keys_str_mv AT groepenhoffherman smallestdetectablechangeinvolumediffersbetweenmassflowsensorandpneumotachograph
AT terweecarolineb smallestdetectablechangeinvolumediffersbetweenmassflowsensorandpneumotachograph
AT jakpatrickmc smallestdetectablechangeinvolumediffersbetweenmassflowsensorandpneumotachograph
AT vonknoordegraafanton smallestdetectablechangeinvolumediffersbetweenmassflowsensorandpneumotachograph