Cargando…
Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: There has been limited study of factors influencing response rates and attrition in online research. Online experiments were nested within the pilot (study 1, n = 3780) and main trial (study 2, n = 2667) phases of an evaluation of a Web-based intervention for hazardous drinkers: the Down...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Gunther Eysenbach
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22100793 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1733 |
_version_ | 1782218768700669952 |
---|---|
author | McCambridge, Jim Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria White, Ian R Khadjesari, Zarnie Murray, Elizabeth Linke, Stuart Thompson, Simon G Godfrey, Christine Wallace, Paul |
author_facet | McCambridge, Jim Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria White, Ian R Khadjesari, Zarnie Murray, Elizabeth Linke, Stuart Thompson, Simon G Godfrey, Christine Wallace, Paul |
author_sort | McCambridge, Jim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There has been limited study of factors influencing response rates and attrition in online research. Online experiments were nested within the pilot (study 1, n = 3780) and main trial (study 2, n = 2667) phases of an evaluation of a Web-based intervention for hazardous drinkers: the Down Your Drink randomized controlled trial (DYD-RCT). OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether differences in the length and relevance of questionnaires can impact upon loss to follow-up in online trials. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial design was used. All participants who consented to enter DYD-RCT and completed the primary outcome questionnaires were randomized to complete one of four secondary outcome questionnaires at baseline and at follow-up. These questionnaires varied in length (additional 23 or 34 versus 10 items) and relevance (alcohol problems versus mental health). The outcome measure was the proportion of participants who completed follow-up at each of two follow-up intervals: study 1 after 1 and 3 months and study 2 after 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: At all four follow-up intervals there were no significant effects of additional questionnaire length on follow-up. Randomization to the less relevant questionnaire resulted in significantly lower rates of follow-up in two of the four assessments made (absolute difference of 4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0%-8%, in both study 1 after 1 month and in study 2 after 12 months). A post hoc pooled analysis across all four follow-up intervals found this effect of marginal statistical significance (unadjusted difference, 3%, range 1%-5%, P = .01; difference adjusted for prespecified covariates, 3%, range 0%-5%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Apparently minor differences in study design decisions may have a measurable impact on attrition in trials. Further investigation is warranted of the impact of the relevance of outcome measures on follow-up rates and, more broadly, of the consequences of what we ask participants to do when we invite them to take part in research studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Register 31070347; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN31070347/31070347 Archived by WebCite at (http://www.webcitation.org/62cpeyYaY) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3236666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Gunther Eysenbach |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32366662012-01-06 Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial McCambridge, Jim Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria White, Ian R Khadjesari, Zarnie Murray, Elizabeth Linke, Stuart Thompson, Simon G Godfrey, Christine Wallace, Paul J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: There has been limited study of factors influencing response rates and attrition in online research. Online experiments were nested within the pilot (study 1, n = 3780) and main trial (study 2, n = 2667) phases of an evaluation of a Web-based intervention for hazardous drinkers: the Down Your Drink randomized controlled trial (DYD-RCT). OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether differences in the length and relevance of questionnaires can impact upon loss to follow-up in online trials. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial design was used. All participants who consented to enter DYD-RCT and completed the primary outcome questionnaires were randomized to complete one of four secondary outcome questionnaires at baseline and at follow-up. These questionnaires varied in length (additional 23 or 34 versus 10 items) and relevance (alcohol problems versus mental health). The outcome measure was the proportion of participants who completed follow-up at each of two follow-up intervals: study 1 after 1 and 3 months and study 2 after 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: At all four follow-up intervals there were no significant effects of additional questionnaire length on follow-up. Randomization to the less relevant questionnaire resulted in significantly lower rates of follow-up in two of the four assessments made (absolute difference of 4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0%-8%, in both study 1 after 1 month and in study 2 after 12 months). A post hoc pooled analysis across all four follow-up intervals found this effect of marginal statistical significance (unadjusted difference, 3%, range 1%-5%, P = .01; difference adjusted for prespecified covariates, 3%, range 0%-5%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Apparently minor differences in study design decisions may have a measurable impact on attrition in trials. Further investigation is warranted of the impact of the relevance of outcome measures on follow-up rates and, more broadly, of the consequences of what we ask participants to do when we invite them to take part in research studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Register 31070347; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN31070347/31070347 Archived by WebCite at (http://www.webcitation.org/62cpeyYaY) Gunther Eysenbach 2011-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3236666/ /pubmed/22100793 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1733 Text en ©Jim McCambridge, Eleftheria Kalaitzaki, Ian R. White, Zarnie Khadjesari, Elizabeth Murray, Stuart Linke, Simon G. Thompson, Christine Godfrey, Paul Wallace. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 18.11.2011. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper McCambridge, Jim Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria White, Ian R Khadjesari, Zarnie Murray, Elizabeth Linke, Stuart Thompson, Simon G Godfrey, Christine Wallace, Paul Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | impact of length or relevance of questionnaires on attrition in online trials: randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22100793 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1733 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccambridgejim impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kalaitzakieleftheria impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT whiteianr impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT khadjesarizarnie impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT murrayelizabeth impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT linkestuart impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thompsonsimong impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT godfreychristine impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wallacepaul impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial |