Cargando…

Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: There has been limited study of factors influencing response rates and attrition in online research. Online experiments were nested within the pilot (study 1, n = 3780) and main trial (study 2, n = 2667) phases of an evaluation of a Web-based intervention for hazardous drinkers: the Down...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCambridge, Jim, Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria, White, Ian R, Khadjesari, Zarnie, Murray, Elizabeth, Linke, Stuart, Thompson, Simon G, Godfrey, Christine, Wallace, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22100793
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1733
_version_ 1782218768700669952
author McCambridge, Jim
Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria
White, Ian R
Khadjesari, Zarnie
Murray, Elizabeth
Linke, Stuart
Thompson, Simon G
Godfrey, Christine
Wallace, Paul
author_facet McCambridge, Jim
Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria
White, Ian R
Khadjesari, Zarnie
Murray, Elizabeth
Linke, Stuart
Thompson, Simon G
Godfrey, Christine
Wallace, Paul
author_sort McCambridge, Jim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been limited study of factors influencing response rates and attrition in online research. Online experiments were nested within the pilot (study 1, n = 3780) and main trial (study 2, n = 2667) phases of an evaluation of a Web-based intervention for hazardous drinkers: the Down Your Drink randomized controlled trial (DYD-RCT). OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether differences in the length and relevance of questionnaires can impact upon loss to follow-up in online trials. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial design was used. All participants who consented to enter DYD-RCT and completed the primary outcome questionnaires were randomized to complete one of four secondary outcome questionnaires at baseline and at follow-up. These questionnaires varied in length (additional 23 or 34 versus 10 items) and relevance (alcohol problems versus mental health). The outcome measure was the proportion of participants who completed follow-up at each of two follow-up intervals: study 1 after 1 and 3 months and study 2 after 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: At all four follow-up intervals there were no significant effects of additional questionnaire length on follow-up. Randomization to the less relevant questionnaire resulted in significantly lower rates of follow-up in two of the four assessments made (absolute difference of 4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0%-8%, in both study 1 after 1 month and in study 2 after 12 months). A post hoc pooled analysis across all four follow-up intervals found this effect of marginal statistical significance (unadjusted difference, 3%, range 1%-5%, P = .01; difference adjusted for prespecified covariates, 3%, range 0%-5%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Apparently minor differences in study design decisions may have a measurable impact on attrition in trials. Further investigation is warranted of the impact of the relevance of outcome measures on follow-up rates and, more broadly, of the consequences of what we ask participants to do when we invite them to take part in research studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Register 31070347; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN31070347/31070347 Archived by WebCite at (http://www.webcitation.org/62cpeyYaY)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3236666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32366662012-01-06 Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial McCambridge, Jim Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria White, Ian R Khadjesari, Zarnie Murray, Elizabeth Linke, Stuart Thompson, Simon G Godfrey, Christine Wallace, Paul J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: There has been limited study of factors influencing response rates and attrition in online research. Online experiments were nested within the pilot (study 1, n = 3780) and main trial (study 2, n = 2667) phases of an evaluation of a Web-based intervention for hazardous drinkers: the Down Your Drink randomized controlled trial (DYD-RCT). OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether differences in the length and relevance of questionnaires can impact upon loss to follow-up in online trials. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial design was used. All participants who consented to enter DYD-RCT and completed the primary outcome questionnaires were randomized to complete one of four secondary outcome questionnaires at baseline and at follow-up. These questionnaires varied in length (additional 23 or 34 versus 10 items) and relevance (alcohol problems versus mental health). The outcome measure was the proportion of participants who completed follow-up at each of two follow-up intervals: study 1 after 1 and 3 months and study 2 after 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: At all four follow-up intervals there were no significant effects of additional questionnaire length on follow-up. Randomization to the less relevant questionnaire resulted in significantly lower rates of follow-up in two of the four assessments made (absolute difference of 4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0%-8%, in both study 1 after 1 month and in study 2 after 12 months). A post hoc pooled analysis across all four follow-up intervals found this effect of marginal statistical significance (unadjusted difference, 3%, range 1%-5%, P = .01; difference adjusted for prespecified covariates, 3%, range 0%-5%, P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Apparently minor differences in study design decisions may have a measurable impact on attrition in trials. Further investigation is warranted of the impact of the relevance of outcome measures on follow-up rates and, more broadly, of the consequences of what we ask participants to do when we invite them to take part in research studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Register 31070347; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN31070347/31070347 Archived by WebCite at (http://www.webcitation.org/62cpeyYaY) Gunther Eysenbach 2011-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3236666/ /pubmed/22100793 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1733 Text en ©Jim McCambridge, Eleftheria Kalaitzaki, Ian R. White, Zarnie Khadjesari, Elizabeth Murray, Stuart Linke, Simon G. Thompson, Christine Godfrey, Paul Wallace. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 18.11.2011. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
McCambridge, Jim
Kalaitzaki, Eleftheria
White, Ian R
Khadjesari, Zarnie
Murray, Elizabeth
Linke, Stuart
Thompson, Simon G
Godfrey, Christine
Wallace, Paul
Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial
title Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Impact of Length or Relevance of Questionnaires on Attrition in Online Trials: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort impact of length or relevance of questionnaires on attrition in online trials: randomized controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22100793
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1733
work_keys_str_mv AT mccambridgejim impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kalaitzakieleftheria impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT whiteianr impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT khadjesarizarnie impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT murrayelizabeth impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linkestuart impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT thompsonsimong impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT godfreychristine impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wallacepaul impactoflengthorrelevanceofquestionnairesonattritioninonlinetrialsrandomizedcontrolledtrial