Cargando…

How Stand Productivity Results from Size- and Competition-Dependent Growth and Mortality

BACKGROUND: A better understanding of the relationship between stand structure and productivity is required for the development of: a) scalable models that can accurately predict growth and yield dynamics for the world's forests; and b) stand management regimes that maximize wood and/or timber...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caspersen, John P., Vanderwel, Mark C., Cole, William G., Purves, Drew W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028660
_version_ 1782218782897340416
author Caspersen, John P.
Vanderwel, Mark C.
Cole, William G.
Purves, Drew W.
author_facet Caspersen, John P.
Vanderwel, Mark C.
Cole, William G.
Purves, Drew W.
author_sort Caspersen, John P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A better understanding of the relationship between stand structure and productivity is required for the development of: a) scalable models that can accurately predict growth and yield dynamics for the world's forests; and b) stand management regimes that maximize wood and/or timber yield, while maintaining structural and species diversity. METHODS: We develop a cohort-based canopy competition model (“CAIN”), parameterized with inventory data from Ontario, Canada, to examine the relationship between stand structure and productivity. Tree growth, mortality and recruitment are quantified as functions of diameter and asymmetric competition, using a competition index (CAI(h)) defined as the total projected area of tree crowns at a given tree's mid-crown height. Stand growth, mortality, and yield are simulated for inventoried stands, and also for hypothetical stands differing in total volume and tree size distribution. RESULTS: For a given diameter, tree growth decreases as CAI(h) increases, whereas the probability of mortality increases. For a given CAI(h), diameter growth exhibits a humped pattern with respect to diameter, whereas mortality exhibits a U-shaped pattern reflecting senescence of large trees. For a fixed size distribution, stand growth increases asymptotically with total density, whereas mortality increases monotonically. Thus, net productivity peaks at an intermediate volume of 100–150 m(3)/ha, and approaches zero at 250 m(3)/ha. However, for a fixed stand volume, mortality due to senescence decreases if the proportion of large trees decreases as overall density increases. This size-related reduction in mortality offsets the density-related increase in mortality, resulting in a 40% increase in yield. CONCLUSIONS: Size-related variation in growth and mortality exerts a profound influence on the relationship between stand structure and productivity. Dense stands dominated by small trees yield more wood than stands dominated by fewer large trees, because the relative growth rate of small trees is higher, and because they are less likely to die.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3236764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32367642011-12-15 How Stand Productivity Results from Size- and Competition-Dependent Growth and Mortality Caspersen, John P. Vanderwel, Mark C. Cole, William G. Purves, Drew W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A better understanding of the relationship between stand structure and productivity is required for the development of: a) scalable models that can accurately predict growth and yield dynamics for the world's forests; and b) stand management regimes that maximize wood and/or timber yield, while maintaining structural and species diversity. METHODS: We develop a cohort-based canopy competition model (“CAIN”), parameterized with inventory data from Ontario, Canada, to examine the relationship between stand structure and productivity. Tree growth, mortality and recruitment are quantified as functions of diameter and asymmetric competition, using a competition index (CAI(h)) defined as the total projected area of tree crowns at a given tree's mid-crown height. Stand growth, mortality, and yield are simulated for inventoried stands, and also for hypothetical stands differing in total volume and tree size distribution. RESULTS: For a given diameter, tree growth decreases as CAI(h) increases, whereas the probability of mortality increases. For a given CAI(h), diameter growth exhibits a humped pattern with respect to diameter, whereas mortality exhibits a U-shaped pattern reflecting senescence of large trees. For a fixed size distribution, stand growth increases asymptotically with total density, whereas mortality increases monotonically. Thus, net productivity peaks at an intermediate volume of 100–150 m(3)/ha, and approaches zero at 250 m(3)/ha. However, for a fixed stand volume, mortality due to senescence decreases if the proportion of large trees decreases as overall density increases. This size-related reduction in mortality offsets the density-related increase in mortality, resulting in a 40% increase in yield. CONCLUSIONS: Size-related variation in growth and mortality exerts a profound influence on the relationship between stand structure and productivity. Dense stands dominated by small trees yield more wood than stands dominated by fewer large trees, because the relative growth rate of small trees is higher, and because they are less likely to die. Public Library of Science 2011-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3236764/ /pubmed/22174861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028660 Text en Caspersen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Caspersen, John P.
Vanderwel, Mark C.
Cole, William G.
Purves, Drew W.
How Stand Productivity Results from Size- and Competition-Dependent Growth and Mortality
title How Stand Productivity Results from Size- and Competition-Dependent Growth and Mortality
title_full How Stand Productivity Results from Size- and Competition-Dependent Growth and Mortality
title_fullStr How Stand Productivity Results from Size- and Competition-Dependent Growth and Mortality
title_full_unstemmed How Stand Productivity Results from Size- and Competition-Dependent Growth and Mortality
title_short How Stand Productivity Results from Size- and Competition-Dependent Growth and Mortality
title_sort how stand productivity results from size- and competition-dependent growth and mortality
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174861
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028660
work_keys_str_mv AT caspersenjohnp howstandproductivityresultsfromsizeandcompetitiondependentgrowthandmortality
AT vanderwelmarkc howstandproductivityresultsfromsizeandcompetitiondependentgrowthandmortality
AT colewilliamg howstandproductivityresultsfromsizeandcompetitiondependentgrowthandmortality
AT purvesdreww howstandproductivityresultsfromsizeandcompetitiondependentgrowthandmortality