Use of (18)F-fluoride PET to determine the appropriate tissue sampling region for improved sensitivity of tissue examinations in cases of suspected periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The accurate diagnosis of periprosthetic infection requires assessment of intraoperative tissues. These must be sampled from the appropriate sites. We used (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography (PET) to identify sites of inflammation in order to improve the sensitivity of histopathology, microbiological culture, and real-time PCR in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 23 THA patients (23 hips) scheduled for revision surgery (the revision group) and 17 uninfected THA patients (23 hips; control group) were enrolled. Uptake was classified into major, minor, and no uptake. To evaluate the association between the (18)F-fluoride uptake and intraoperative tissue results in the revision group, we calculated their sensitivity on each of the major, minor, and no-uptake sides. RESULTS: 17 revision patients showed major uptake and all were diagnosed as having septic loosening from intraoperative tissue results. Minor uptake was observed in the other 6 revision patients and all were diagnosed as having aseptic loosening. Apart from 3 cases that showed minor uptake regions, control subjects showed no uptake. In the revision group, the sensitivities of histopathology, microbiological culture, real-time PCR separately and also in combination were 0.78, 0.58, 0.96, and 0.96, respectively, on the major (18)F-fluoride uptake sides, 0.0, 0.0, 0.1, and 0.1 on the minor-uptake sides, and 0, 0, 0.18, and 0.18 on the no-uptake sides. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that preoperative assessment of major uptake of (18)F-fluoride markedly improves the accuracy of tissue sampling, and thus the sensitivity of subsequent tissue examinations. More definitive diagnosis of periprosthetic infection is therefore possible.