Cargando…

Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually severe, and epidural analgesia or femoral nerve block has been considered to be an effective pain treatment. Recently, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) has become increasingly popular but the outcome of this method regardi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Affas, Fatin, Nygårds, Eva-Britt, Stiller, Carl-Olav, Wretenberg, Per, Olofsson, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21561303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.581264
_version_ 1782218835317751808
author Affas, Fatin
Nygårds, Eva-Britt
Stiller, Carl-Olav
Wretenberg, Per
Olofsson, Christina
author_facet Affas, Fatin
Nygårds, Eva-Britt
Stiller, Carl-Olav
Wretenberg, Per
Olofsson, Christina
author_sort Affas, Fatin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually severe, and epidural analgesia or femoral nerve block has been considered to be an effective pain treatment. Recently, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) has become increasingly popular but the outcome of this method regarding the analgesic effect has not been fully evaluated. We compared local infiltration analgesia and femoral block with regard to analgesia and morphine demand during the first 24 h after TKA. METHODS: 40 patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive femoral nerve block (group F) or peri- and intraarticular infiltration analgesia (group LIA) with a mixture containing ropivacaine, ketorolac, and epinephrine. All patients had access to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine postoperatively. Pain intensity at rest and upon movement was assessed on a numeric rating scale (0–10) on an hourly basis over 24 h if the patients were awake. RESULTS: The average pain at rest was marginally lower with LIA (1.6) than with femoral block (2.2). Total morphine consumption per kg was similar between the 2 groups. Ancillary analysis revealed that 1 of 20 patients in the LIA group reported a pain intensity of > 7 upon movement, as compared to 7 out of 19 in the femoral block group (p = 0.04). INTERPRETATION: Both LIA and femoral block provide good analgesia after TKA. LIA may be considered to be superior to femoral block since it is cheaper and easier to perform.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3237035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32370352012-01-03 Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block Affas, Fatin Nygårds, Eva-Britt Stiller, Carl-Olav Wretenberg, Per Olofsson, Christina Acta Orthop Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually severe, and epidural analgesia or femoral nerve block has been considered to be an effective pain treatment. Recently, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) has become increasingly popular but the outcome of this method regarding the analgesic effect has not been fully evaluated. We compared local infiltration analgesia and femoral block with regard to analgesia and morphine demand during the first 24 h after TKA. METHODS: 40 patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive femoral nerve block (group F) or peri- and intraarticular infiltration analgesia (group LIA) with a mixture containing ropivacaine, ketorolac, and epinephrine. All patients had access to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine postoperatively. Pain intensity at rest and upon movement was assessed on a numeric rating scale (0–10) on an hourly basis over 24 h if the patients were awake. RESULTS: The average pain at rest was marginally lower with LIA (1.6) than with femoral block (2.2). Total morphine consumption per kg was similar between the 2 groups. Ancillary analysis revealed that 1 of 20 patients in the LIA group reported a pain intensity of > 7 upon movement, as compared to 7 out of 19 in the femoral block group (p = 0.04). INTERPRETATION: Both LIA and femoral block provide good analgesia after TKA. LIA may be considered to be superior to femoral block since it is cheaper and easier to perform. Informa Healthcare 2011-08 2011-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3237035/ /pubmed/21561303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.581264 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Article
Affas, Fatin
Nygårds, Eva-Britt
Stiller, Carl-Olav
Wretenberg, Per
Olofsson, Christina
Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block
title Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block
title_full Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block
title_fullStr Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block
title_full_unstemmed Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block
title_short Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block
title_sort pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21561303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.581264
work_keys_str_mv AT affasfatin paincontrolaftertotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedtrialcomparinglocalinfiltrationanesthesiaandcontinuousfemoralblock
AT nygardsevabritt paincontrolaftertotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedtrialcomparinglocalinfiltrationanesthesiaandcontinuousfemoralblock
AT stillercarlolav paincontrolaftertotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedtrialcomparinglocalinfiltrationanesthesiaandcontinuousfemoralblock
AT wretenbergper paincontrolaftertotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedtrialcomparinglocalinfiltrationanesthesiaandcontinuousfemoralblock
AT olofssonchristina paincontrolaftertotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedtrialcomparinglocalinfiltrationanesthesiaandcontinuousfemoralblock