Cargando…

Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension

BACKGROUND: Four oscillometric devices for self-measurement of blood pressure (SBPM) were evaluated according to the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) international protocol and its 2010 revision in four separate studies. The Omron(®) M2, Omron M3, and Omron M6 measure blood pressure (BP) at th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topouchian, Jirar, Agnoletti, Davide, Blacher, Jacques, Youssef, Ahmed, Ibanez, Isabel, Khabouth, Jose, Khawaja, Salwa, Beaino, Layale, Asmar, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174581
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S27193
_version_ 1782218840484085760
author Topouchian, Jirar
Agnoletti, Davide
Blacher, Jacques
Youssef, Ahmed
Ibanez, Isabel
Khabouth, Jose
Khawaja, Salwa
Beaino, Layale
Asmar, Roland
author_facet Topouchian, Jirar
Agnoletti, Davide
Blacher, Jacques
Youssef, Ahmed
Ibanez, Isabel
Khabouth, Jose
Khawaja, Salwa
Beaino, Layale
Asmar, Roland
author_sort Topouchian, Jirar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Four oscillometric devices for self-measurement of blood pressure (SBPM) were evaluated according to the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) international protocol and its 2010 revision in four separate studies. The Omron(®) M2, Omron M3, and Omron M6 measure blood pressure (BP) at the brachial level, while the Omron R2 measures BP at the wrist level. METHODS: The international protocol requires a total number of 33 subjects in which the validation is performed. The Omron M2 and Omron R2 were validated in 2009 according to the ESH international protocol, while the Omron M3 and Omron M6 were validated in 2010–2011 according to the 2010 ESH international protocol revision. The protocol procedures were followed precisely. RESULTS: All four tested devices passed the validation process. The mean differences between the device and mercury readings were 2.7 ± 5.0 and −1.4 ± 3.2 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively, using the Omron M2 device, and 1.7 ± 3.2 and −0.9 ± 2.6 mmHg using the Omron M3, 1.6 ± 2.9 and −0.9 ± 2.5 mmHg using the Omron M6, and −1.1 ± 4.8 and −0.9 ± 4.3 mmHg using the Omron R2. CONCLUSION: Readings from the Omron M2, Omron M3, Omron M6, and Omron R2, differing by less than 5, 10, and 15 mmHg, fulfill the ESH international protocol and its 2010 revision requirements. Therefore, each of these four devices can be used by patients for SBPM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3237100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32371002011-12-15 Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension Topouchian, Jirar Agnoletti, Davide Blacher, Jacques Youssef, Ahmed Ibanez, Isabel Khabouth, Jose Khawaja, Salwa Beaino, Layale Asmar, Roland Vasc Health Risk Manag Review BACKGROUND: Four oscillometric devices for self-measurement of blood pressure (SBPM) were evaluated according to the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) international protocol and its 2010 revision in four separate studies. The Omron(®) M2, Omron M3, and Omron M6 measure blood pressure (BP) at the brachial level, while the Omron R2 measures BP at the wrist level. METHODS: The international protocol requires a total number of 33 subjects in which the validation is performed. The Omron M2 and Omron R2 were validated in 2009 according to the ESH international protocol, while the Omron M3 and Omron M6 were validated in 2010–2011 according to the 2010 ESH international protocol revision. The protocol procedures were followed precisely. RESULTS: All four tested devices passed the validation process. The mean differences between the device and mercury readings were 2.7 ± 5.0 and −1.4 ± 3.2 mmHg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively, using the Omron M2 device, and 1.7 ± 3.2 and −0.9 ± 2.6 mmHg using the Omron M3, 1.6 ± 2.9 and −0.9 ± 2.5 mmHg using the Omron M6, and −1.1 ± 4.8 and −0.9 ± 4.3 mmHg using the Omron R2. CONCLUSION: Readings from the Omron M2, Omron M3, Omron M6, and Omron R2, differing by less than 5, 10, and 15 mmHg, fulfill the ESH international protocol and its 2010 revision requirements. Therefore, each of these four devices can be used by patients for SBPM. Dove Medical Press 2011 2011-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3237100/ /pubmed/22174581 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S27193 Text en © 2011 Topouchian et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Topouchian, Jirar
Agnoletti, Davide
Blacher, Jacques
Youssef, Ahmed
Ibanez, Isabel
Khabouth, Jose
Khawaja, Salwa
Beaino, Layale
Asmar, Roland
Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension
title Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension
title_full Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension
title_fullStr Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension
title_short Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension
title_sort validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the european society of hypertension
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174581
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S27193
work_keys_str_mv AT topouchianjirar validationoffourautomaticdevicesforselfmeasurementofbloodpressureaccordingtotheinternationalprotocoloftheeuropeansocietyofhypertension
AT agnolettidavide validationoffourautomaticdevicesforselfmeasurementofbloodpressureaccordingtotheinternationalprotocoloftheeuropeansocietyofhypertension
AT blacherjacques validationoffourautomaticdevicesforselfmeasurementofbloodpressureaccordingtotheinternationalprotocoloftheeuropeansocietyofhypertension
AT youssefahmed validationoffourautomaticdevicesforselfmeasurementofbloodpressureaccordingtotheinternationalprotocoloftheeuropeansocietyofhypertension
AT ibanezisabel validationoffourautomaticdevicesforselfmeasurementofbloodpressureaccordingtotheinternationalprotocoloftheeuropeansocietyofhypertension
AT khabouthjose validationoffourautomaticdevicesforselfmeasurementofbloodpressureaccordingtotheinternationalprotocoloftheeuropeansocietyofhypertension
AT khawajasalwa validationoffourautomaticdevicesforselfmeasurementofbloodpressureaccordingtotheinternationalprotocoloftheeuropeansocietyofhypertension
AT beainolayale validationoffourautomaticdevicesforselfmeasurementofbloodpressureaccordingtotheinternationalprotocoloftheeuropeansocietyofhypertension
AT asmarroland validationoffourautomaticdevicesforselfmeasurementofbloodpressureaccordingtotheinternationalprotocoloftheeuropeansocietyofhypertension