Cargando…

Fibreoptic bronchoscopy without sedation: Is transcricoid injection better than the “spray as you go” technique?

AIM: The aim of the study was to compare transcricoid injection with spray as you go technique for diagnostic fibreoptic bronchoscopy, to perform the procedure without sedation and to record any complication or side effects. METHODS: Sixty patients belonging to the age group 20–70 years, undergoing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandra, Alka, Banavaliker, Jayant N, Agarwal, Manoj Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174465
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.89877
_version_ 1782218848132399104
author Chandra, Alka
Banavaliker, Jayant N
Agarwal, Manoj Kumar
author_facet Chandra, Alka
Banavaliker, Jayant N
Agarwal, Manoj Kumar
author_sort Chandra, Alka
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the study was to compare transcricoid injection with spray as you go technique for diagnostic fibreoptic bronchoscopy, to perform the procedure without sedation and to record any complication or side effects. METHODS: Sixty patients belonging to the age group 20–70 years, undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy over a period of 6 months, were randomly selected and divided into two groups alternatively to receive 3 ml of 4% lignocaine by a single transcricoid puncture (group I) or 2 ml of 4% lignocaine instilled through the bronchoscope on to the vocal cords and further 1 ml of 2% lignocaine into each main bronchus (group II). Additional dose of lignocaine as required was given in both the groups. All patients were given intramuscular atropine 0.6 mg, 20 min before the procedure. Nebulisation with 3 ml of 4% lignocaine was given to all patients. The time from nasal insertion of the bronchoscope to reach the carina was recorded, and the total dose of lignocaine required in both the groups was calculated and compared. The cough episodes during the procedure, systolic blood pressure, and pulse rate were compared before the procedure and 5 min after the procedure in both the groups. A0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess discomfort 30 min after the procedure. RESULTS: The time to reach carina was more in group II (P<0.02), and cough episodes were also more in group II (P<0.05) than in group I. The vitals before the procedure were comparable in both the groups, but 5 min after the procedure the vitals were more stable in group I than in group II, and the total dose of lignocaine required in group II was more than in group I (P<0.001). However, the VAS score was comparable in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Transcricoid puncture for diagnostic bronchoscopies without sedation was associated with no complication and discomfort and required lesser dose of local anaesthetic with more stable vitals and good conditions for bronchoscopists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3237148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32371482011-12-15 Fibreoptic bronchoscopy without sedation: Is transcricoid injection better than the “spray as you go” technique? Chandra, Alka Banavaliker, Jayant N Agarwal, Manoj Kumar Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation AIM: The aim of the study was to compare transcricoid injection with spray as you go technique for diagnostic fibreoptic bronchoscopy, to perform the procedure without sedation and to record any complication or side effects. METHODS: Sixty patients belonging to the age group 20–70 years, undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy over a period of 6 months, were randomly selected and divided into two groups alternatively to receive 3 ml of 4% lignocaine by a single transcricoid puncture (group I) or 2 ml of 4% lignocaine instilled through the bronchoscope on to the vocal cords and further 1 ml of 2% lignocaine into each main bronchus (group II). Additional dose of lignocaine as required was given in both the groups. All patients were given intramuscular atropine 0.6 mg, 20 min before the procedure. Nebulisation with 3 ml of 4% lignocaine was given to all patients. The time from nasal insertion of the bronchoscope to reach the carina was recorded, and the total dose of lignocaine required in both the groups was calculated and compared. The cough episodes during the procedure, systolic blood pressure, and pulse rate were compared before the procedure and 5 min after the procedure in both the groups. A0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess discomfort 30 min after the procedure. RESULTS: The time to reach carina was more in group II (P<0.02), and cough episodes were also more in group II (P<0.05) than in group I. The vitals before the procedure were comparable in both the groups, but 5 min after the procedure the vitals were more stable in group I than in group II, and the total dose of lignocaine required in group II was more than in group I (P<0.001). However, the VAS score was comparable in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Transcricoid puncture for diagnostic bronchoscopies without sedation was associated with no complication and discomfort and required lesser dose of local anaesthetic with more stable vitals and good conditions for bronchoscopists. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3237148/ /pubmed/22174465 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.89877 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Chandra, Alka
Banavaliker, Jayant N
Agarwal, Manoj Kumar
Fibreoptic bronchoscopy without sedation: Is transcricoid injection better than the “spray as you go” technique?
title Fibreoptic bronchoscopy without sedation: Is transcricoid injection better than the “spray as you go” technique?
title_full Fibreoptic bronchoscopy without sedation: Is transcricoid injection better than the “spray as you go” technique?
title_fullStr Fibreoptic bronchoscopy without sedation: Is transcricoid injection better than the “spray as you go” technique?
title_full_unstemmed Fibreoptic bronchoscopy without sedation: Is transcricoid injection better than the “spray as you go” technique?
title_short Fibreoptic bronchoscopy without sedation: Is transcricoid injection better than the “spray as you go” technique?
title_sort fibreoptic bronchoscopy without sedation: is transcricoid injection better than the “spray as you go” technique?
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174465
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.89877
work_keys_str_mv AT chandraalka fibreopticbronchoscopywithoutsedationistranscricoidinjectionbetterthanthesprayasyougotechnique
AT banavalikerjayantn fibreopticbronchoscopywithoutsedationistranscricoidinjectionbetterthanthesprayasyougotechnique
AT agarwalmanojkumar fibreopticbronchoscopywithoutsedationistranscricoidinjectionbetterthanthesprayasyougotechnique