Cargando…

Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion

PURPOSE: A fixed dose of propofol administered rapidly can be insufficient or in excess resulting in airway complications and haemodynamic disturbances. This study is designed to assess whether loss of motor response to jaw thrust can be a reliable clinical indicator of anaesthetic depth for larynge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnappa, Sudeep, Kundra, Pankaj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174469
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.89887
_version_ 1782218849049903104
author Krishnappa, Sudeep
Kundra, Pankaj
author_facet Krishnappa, Sudeep
Kundra, Pankaj
author_sort Krishnappa, Sudeep
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: A fixed dose of propofol administered rapidly can be insufficient or in excess resulting in airway complications and haemodynamic disturbances. This study is designed to assess whether loss of motor response to jaw thrust can be a reliable clinical indicator of anaesthetic depth for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. METHODS: One hundred and twenty ASA I and II patients scheduled for general anaesthesia on day care basis were randomly allocated into two groups. Following pre-oxygenation, anaesthesia was induced to accomplish LMA insertion either with a 3 mg/kg propofol (Group CD, n=60) or in dose to abolish jaw thrust response (Group JT, n=60). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate were continuously monitored while LMA insertion conditions were recorded using 6 variable, 3 point score. RESULTS: 85% patients developed apnea in group CD when compared to 2% in group JT, P<0.0001. Despite similar insertion score, propofol consumption was significantly more in group CD when compared to group JT. More than 20% fall of MAP from baseline was noted in group CD after induction but there was no significant hypotension at any time in group JT. CONCLUSION: Loss of motor response to jaw thrust provides satisfactory LMA insertion conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3237152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32371522011-12-15 Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion Krishnappa, Sudeep Kundra, Pankaj Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: A fixed dose of propofol administered rapidly can be insufficient or in excess resulting in airway complications and haemodynamic disturbances. This study is designed to assess whether loss of motor response to jaw thrust can be a reliable clinical indicator of anaesthetic depth for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. METHODS: One hundred and twenty ASA I and II patients scheduled for general anaesthesia on day care basis were randomly allocated into two groups. Following pre-oxygenation, anaesthesia was induced to accomplish LMA insertion either with a 3 mg/kg propofol (Group CD, n=60) or in dose to abolish jaw thrust response (Group JT, n=60). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate were continuously monitored while LMA insertion conditions were recorded using 6 variable, 3 point score. RESULTS: 85% patients developed apnea in group CD when compared to 2% in group JT, P<0.0001. Despite similar insertion score, propofol consumption was significantly more in group CD when compared to group JT. More than 20% fall of MAP from baseline was noted in group CD after induction but there was no significant hypotension at any time in group JT. CONCLUSION: Loss of motor response to jaw thrust provides satisfactory LMA insertion conditions. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3237152/ /pubmed/22174469 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.89887 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Krishnappa, Sudeep
Kundra, Pankaj
Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion
title Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion
title_full Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion
title_fullStr Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion
title_full_unstemmed Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion
title_short Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion
title_sort optimal anaesthetic depth for lma insertion
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174469
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.89887
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnappasudeep optimalanaestheticdepthforlmainsertion
AT kundrapankaj optimalanaestheticdepthforlmainsertion