Cargando…
Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion
PURPOSE: A fixed dose of propofol administered rapidly can be insufficient or in excess resulting in airway complications and haemodynamic disturbances. This study is designed to assess whether loss of motor response to jaw thrust can be a reliable clinical indicator of anaesthetic depth for larynge...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174469 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.89887 |
_version_ | 1782218849049903104 |
---|---|
author | Krishnappa, Sudeep Kundra, Pankaj |
author_facet | Krishnappa, Sudeep Kundra, Pankaj |
author_sort | Krishnappa, Sudeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: A fixed dose of propofol administered rapidly can be insufficient or in excess resulting in airway complications and haemodynamic disturbances. This study is designed to assess whether loss of motor response to jaw thrust can be a reliable clinical indicator of anaesthetic depth for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. METHODS: One hundred and twenty ASA I and II patients scheduled for general anaesthesia on day care basis were randomly allocated into two groups. Following pre-oxygenation, anaesthesia was induced to accomplish LMA insertion either with a 3 mg/kg propofol (Group CD, n=60) or in dose to abolish jaw thrust response (Group JT, n=60). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate were continuously monitored while LMA insertion conditions were recorded using 6 variable, 3 point score. RESULTS: 85% patients developed apnea in group CD when compared to 2% in group JT, P<0.0001. Despite similar insertion score, propofol consumption was significantly more in group CD when compared to group JT. More than 20% fall of MAP from baseline was noted in group CD after induction but there was no significant hypotension at any time in group JT. CONCLUSION: Loss of motor response to jaw thrust provides satisfactory LMA insertion conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3237152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32371522011-12-15 Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion Krishnappa, Sudeep Kundra, Pankaj Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: A fixed dose of propofol administered rapidly can be insufficient or in excess resulting in airway complications and haemodynamic disturbances. This study is designed to assess whether loss of motor response to jaw thrust can be a reliable clinical indicator of anaesthetic depth for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. METHODS: One hundred and twenty ASA I and II patients scheduled for general anaesthesia on day care basis were randomly allocated into two groups. Following pre-oxygenation, anaesthesia was induced to accomplish LMA insertion either with a 3 mg/kg propofol (Group CD, n=60) or in dose to abolish jaw thrust response (Group JT, n=60). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate were continuously monitored while LMA insertion conditions were recorded using 6 variable, 3 point score. RESULTS: 85% patients developed apnea in group CD when compared to 2% in group JT, P<0.0001. Despite similar insertion score, propofol consumption was significantly more in group CD when compared to group JT. More than 20% fall of MAP from baseline was noted in group CD after induction but there was no significant hypotension at any time in group JT. CONCLUSION: Loss of motor response to jaw thrust provides satisfactory LMA insertion conditions. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3237152/ /pubmed/22174469 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.89887 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigation Krishnappa, Sudeep Kundra, Pankaj Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion |
title | Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion |
title_full | Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion |
title_fullStr | Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion |
title_short | Optimal anaesthetic depth for LMA insertion |
title_sort | optimal anaesthetic depth for lma insertion |
topic | Clinical Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174469 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.89887 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krishnappasudeep optimalanaestheticdepthforlmainsertion AT kundrapankaj optimalanaestheticdepthforlmainsertion |