Cargando…
A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy
BACKGROUND: Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) has become an indispensable organ, but not always function preserving treatment modality for advanced head and neck cancer. To prevent/limit the functional side effects of CCRT, special exercise programs are increasingly explored. This study presents...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22051143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-475 |
_version_ | 1782218918984679424 |
---|---|
author | Retèl, Valesca P van der Molen, Lisette Hilgers, Frans JM Rasch, Coen RN L'Ortye, Annemiek AAMHJ Steuten, Lotte MG van Harten, Wim H |
author_facet | Retèl, Valesca P van der Molen, Lisette Hilgers, Frans JM Rasch, Coen RN L'Ortye, Annemiek AAMHJ Steuten, Lotte MG van Harten, Wim H |
author_sort | Retèl, Valesca P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) has become an indispensable organ, but not always function preserving treatment modality for advanced head and neck cancer. To prevent/limit the functional side effects of CCRT, special exercise programs are increasingly explored. This study presents cost-effectiveness analyses of a preventive (swallowing) exercise program (PREP) compared to usual care (UC) from a health care perspective. METHODS: A Markov decision model of PREP versus UC was developed for CCRT in advanced head and neck cancer. Main outcome variables were tube dependency at one-year and number of post-CCRT hospital admission days. Primary outcome was costs per quality adjusted life years (cost/QALY), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as outcome parameter. The Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) was calculated to obtain the value of further research. RESULTS: PREP resulted in less tube dependency (3% and 25%, respectively), and in fewer hospital admission days than UC (3.2 and 4.5 days respectively). Total costs for UC amounted to €41,986 and for PREP to €42,271. Quality adjusted life years for UC amounted to 0.68 and for PREP to 0.77. Based on costs per QALY, PREP has a higher probability of being cost-effective as long as the willingness to pay threshold for 1 additional QALY is at least €3,200/QALY. At the prevailing threshold of €20,000/QALY the probability for PREP being cost-effective compared to UC was 83%. The EVPI demonstrated potential value in undertaking additional research to reduce the existing decision uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Based on current evidence, PREP for CCRT in advanced head and neck cancer has the higher probability of being cost-effective when compared to UC. Moreover, the majority of sensitivity analyses produced ICERs that are well below the prevailing willingness to pay threshold for an additional QALY (range from dominance till €45,906/QALY). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3237585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32375852011-12-15 A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy Retèl, Valesca P van der Molen, Lisette Hilgers, Frans JM Rasch, Coen RN L'Ortye, Annemiek AAMHJ Steuten, Lotte MG van Harten, Wim H BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) has become an indispensable organ, but not always function preserving treatment modality for advanced head and neck cancer. To prevent/limit the functional side effects of CCRT, special exercise programs are increasingly explored. This study presents cost-effectiveness analyses of a preventive (swallowing) exercise program (PREP) compared to usual care (UC) from a health care perspective. METHODS: A Markov decision model of PREP versus UC was developed for CCRT in advanced head and neck cancer. Main outcome variables were tube dependency at one-year and number of post-CCRT hospital admission days. Primary outcome was costs per quality adjusted life years (cost/QALY), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as outcome parameter. The Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) was calculated to obtain the value of further research. RESULTS: PREP resulted in less tube dependency (3% and 25%, respectively), and in fewer hospital admission days than UC (3.2 and 4.5 days respectively). Total costs for UC amounted to €41,986 and for PREP to €42,271. Quality adjusted life years for UC amounted to 0.68 and for PREP to 0.77. Based on costs per QALY, PREP has a higher probability of being cost-effective as long as the willingness to pay threshold for 1 additional QALY is at least €3,200/QALY. At the prevailing threshold of €20,000/QALY the probability for PREP being cost-effective compared to UC was 83%. The EVPI demonstrated potential value in undertaking additional research to reduce the existing decision uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Based on current evidence, PREP for CCRT in advanced head and neck cancer has the higher probability of being cost-effective when compared to UC. Moreover, the majority of sensitivity analyses produced ICERs that are well below the prevailing willingness to pay threshold for an additional QALY (range from dominance till €45,906/QALY). BioMed Central 2011-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3237585/ /pubmed/22051143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-475 Text en Copyright ©2011 Retèl et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Retèl, Valesca P van der Molen, Lisette Hilgers, Frans JM Rasch, Coen RN L'Ortye, Annemiek AAMHJ Steuten, Lotte MG van Harten, Wim H A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy |
title | A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy |
title_full | A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy |
title_short | A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22051143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-475 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT retelvalescap acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT vandermolenlisette acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT hilgersfransjm acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT raschcoenrn acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT lortyeannemiekaamhj acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT steutenlottemg acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT vanhartenwimh acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT retelvalescap costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT vandermolenlisette costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT hilgersfransjm costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT raschcoenrn costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT lortyeannemiekaamhj costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT steutenlottemg costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy AT vanhartenwimh costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy |