Cargando…

A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) has become an indispensable organ, but not always function preserving treatment modality for advanced head and neck cancer. To prevent/limit the functional side effects of CCRT, special exercise programs are increasingly explored. This study presents...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Retèl, Valesca P, van der Molen, Lisette, Hilgers, Frans JM, Rasch, Coen RN, L'Ortye, Annemiek AAMHJ, Steuten, Lotte MG, van Harten, Wim H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22051143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-475
_version_ 1782218918984679424
author Retèl, Valesca P
van der Molen, Lisette
Hilgers, Frans JM
Rasch, Coen RN
L'Ortye, Annemiek AAMHJ
Steuten, Lotte MG
van Harten, Wim H
author_facet Retèl, Valesca P
van der Molen, Lisette
Hilgers, Frans JM
Rasch, Coen RN
L'Ortye, Annemiek AAMHJ
Steuten, Lotte MG
van Harten, Wim H
author_sort Retèl, Valesca P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) has become an indispensable organ, but not always function preserving treatment modality for advanced head and neck cancer. To prevent/limit the functional side effects of CCRT, special exercise programs are increasingly explored. This study presents cost-effectiveness analyses of a preventive (swallowing) exercise program (PREP) compared to usual care (UC) from a health care perspective. METHODS: A Markov decision model of PREP versus UC was developed for CCRT in advanced head and neck cancer. Main outcome variables were tube dependency at one-year and number of post-CCRT hospital admission days. Primary outcome was costs per quality adjusted life years (cost/QALY), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as outcome parameter. The Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) was calculated to obtain the value of further research. RESULTS: PREP resulted in less tube dependency (3% and 25%, respectively), and in fewer hospital admission days than UC (3.2 and 4.5 days respectively). Total costs for UC amounted to €41,986 and for PREP to €42,271. Quality adjusted life years for UC amounted to 0.68 and for PREP to 0.77. Based on costs per QALY, PREP has a higher probability of being cost-effective as long as the willingness to pay threshold for 1 additional QALY is at least €3,200/QALY. At the prevailing threshold of €20,000/QALY the probability for PREP being cost-effective compared to UC was 83%. The EVPI demonstrated potential value in undertaking additional research to reduce the existing decision uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Based on current evidence, PREP for CCRT in advanced head and neck cancer has the higher probability of being cost-effective when compared to UC. Moreover, the majority of sensitivity analyses produced ICERs that are well below the prevailing willingness to pay threshold for an additional QALY (range from dominance till €45,906/QALY).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3237585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32375852011-12-15 A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy Retèl, Valesca P van der Molen, Lisette Hilgers, Frans JM Rasch, Coen RN L'Ortye, Annemiek AAMHJ Steuten, Lotte MG van Harten, Wim H BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) has become an indispensable organ, but not always function preserving treatment modality for advanced head and neck cancer. To prevent/limit the functional side effects of CCRT, special exercise programs are increasingly explored. This study presents cost-effectiveness analyses of a preventive (swallowing) exercise program (PREP) compared to usual care (UC) from a health care perspective. METHODS: A Markov decision model of PREP versus UC was developed for CCRT in advanced head and neck cancer. Main outcome variables were tube dependency at one-year and number of post-CCRT hospital admission days. Primary outcome was costs per quality adjusted life years (cost/QALY), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) as outcome parameter. The Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) was calculated to obtain the value of further research. RESULTS: PREP resulted in less tube dependency (3% and 25%, respectively), and in fewer hospital admission days than UC (3.2 and 4.5 days respectively). Total costs for UC amounted to €41,986 and for PREP to €42,271. Quality adjusted life years for UC amounted to 0.68 and for PREP to 0.77. Based on costs per QALY, PREP has a higher probability of being cost-effective as long as the willingness to pay threshold for 1 additional QALY is at least €3,200/QALY. At the prevailing threshold of €20,000/QALY the probability for PREP being cost-effective compared to UC was 83%. The EVPI demonstrated potential value in undertaking additional research to reduce the existing decision uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Based on current evidence, PREP for CCRT in advanced head and neck cancer has the higher probability of being cost-effective when compared to UC. Moreover, the majority of sensitivity analyses produced ICERs that are well below the prevailing willingness to pay threshold for an additional QALY (range from dominance till €45,906/QALY). BioMed Central 2011-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3237585/ /pubmed/22051143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-475 Text en Copyright ©2011 Retèl et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Retèl, Valesca P
van der Molen, Lisette
Hilgers, Frans JM
Rasch, Coen RN
L'Ortye, Annemiek AAMHJ
Steuten, Lotte MG
van Harten, Wim H
A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy
title A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy
title_full A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy
title_fullStr A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy
title_short A cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of a preventive exercise program for patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22051143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-475
work_keys_str_mv AT retelvalescap acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT vandermolenlisette acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT hilgersfransjm acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT raschcoenrn acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT lortyeannemiekaamhj acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT steutenlottemg acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT vanhartenwimh acosteffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT retelvalescap costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT vandermolenlisette costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT hilgersfransjm costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT raschcoenrn costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT lortyeannemiekaamhj costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT steutenlottemg costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy
AT vanhartenwimh costeffectivenessanalysisofapreventiveexerciseprogramforpatientswithadvancedheadandneckcancertreatedwithconcomitantchemoradiotherapy