Cargando…

Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices

Bone marrow sampling remains essential in the evaluation of hematopoietic and many non-hematopoietic disorders. One common limitation to these procedures is the discomfort experienced by patients. To address whether a Powered biopsy system could reduce discomfort while providing equivalent or better...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Larry J., Philbeck, Thomas E., Montez, Diana F., Puga, Tatiana A., Brodie, Kim E., Cohen, Stephen C., Spadaccini, Cathy, Swords, Ronan, Brenner, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3238476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22184530
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/hr.2011.e8
_version_ 1782219007052480512
author Miller, Larry J.
Philbeck, Thomas E.
Montez, Diana F.
Puga, Tatiana A.
Brodie, Kim E.
Cohen, Stephen C.
Spadaccini, Cathy
Swords, Ronan
Brenner, Andrew J.
author_facet Miller, Larry J.
Philbeck, Thomas E.
Montez, Diana F.
Puga, Tatiana A.
Brodie, Kim E.
Cohen, Stephen C.
Spadaccini, Cathy
Swords, Ronan
Brenner, Andrew J.
author_sort Miller, Larry J.
collection PubMed
description Bone marrow sampling remains essential in the evaluation of hematopoietic and many non-hematopoietic disorders. One common limitation to these procedures is the discomfort experienced by patients. To address whether a Powered biopsy system could reduce discomfort while providing equivalent or better results, we performed a randomized trial in adult volunteers. Twenty-six subjects underwent bilateral biopsies with each device. Core samples were obtained in 66.7% of Manual insertions; 100% of Powered insertions (P=0.002). Initial mean biopsy core lengths were 11.1±4.5 mm for the Manual device; 17.0±6.8 mm for the Powered device (P<0.005). Pathology assessment for the Manual device showed a mean length of 6.1±5.6 mm, width of 1.0±0.7 mm, and volume of 11.0±10.8 mm(3). Powered device measurements were mean length of 15.3±6.1 mm, width of 2.0±0.3 mm, and volume of 49.1±21.5 mm(3) (P<0.001). The mean time to core ejection was 86 seconds for Manual device; 47 seconds for the Powered device (P<0.001). The mean second look overall pain score was 33.3 for the Manual device; 20.9 for the Powered (P=0.039). We conclude that the Powered biopsy device produces superior sized specimens, with less overall pain, in less time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3238476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher PAGEPress Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32384762011-12-19 Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices Miller, Larry J. Philbeck, Thomas E. Montez, Diana F. Puga, Tatiana A. Brodie, Kim E. Cohen, Stephen C. Spadaccini, Cathy Swords, Ronan Brenner, Andrew J. Hematol Rep Article Bone marrow sampling remains essential in the evaluation of hematopoietic and many non-hematopoietic disorders. One common limitation to these procedures is the discomfort experienced by patients. To address whether a Powered biopsy system could reduce discomfort while providing equivalent or better results, we performed a randomized trial in adult volunteers. Twenty-six subjects underwent bilateral biopsies with each device. Core samples were obtained in 66.7% of Manual insertions; 100% of Powered insertions (P=0.002). Initial mean biopsy core lengths were 11.1±4.5 mm for the Manual device; 17.0±6.8 mm for the Powered device (P<0.005). Pathology assessment for the Manual device showed a mean length of 6.1±5.6 mm, width of 1.0±0.7 mm, and volume of 11.0±10.8 mm(3). Powered device measurements were mean length of 15.3±6.1 mm, width of 2.0±0.3 mm, and volume of 49.1±21.5 mm(3) (P<0.001). The mean time to core ejection was 86 seconds for Manual device; 47 seconds for the Powered device (P<0.001). The mean second look overall pain score was 33.3 for the Manual device; 20.9 for the Powered (P=0.039). We conclude that the Powered biopsy device produces superior sized specimens, with less overall pain, in less time. PAGEPress Publications 2011-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3238476/ /pubmed/22184530 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/hr.2011.e8 Text en ©Copyright L.J. Miller et al., 2011 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0). Licensee PAGEPress, Italy
spellingShingle Article
Miller, Larry J.
Philbeck, Thomas E.
Montez, Diana F.
Puga, Tatiana A.
Brodie, Kim E.
Cohen, Stephen C.
Spadaccini, Cathy
Swords, Ronan
Brenner, Andrew J.
Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices
title Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices
title_full Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices
title_fullStr Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices
title_full_unstemmed Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices
title_short Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices
title_sort powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3238476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22184530
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/hr.2011.e8
work_keys_str_mv AT millerlarryj poweredbonemarrowbiopsyproceduresproducelargercorespecimenswithlesspaininlesstimethanwithstandardmanualdevices
AT philbeckthomase poweredbonemarrowbiopsyproceduresproducelargercorespecimenswithlesspaininlesstimethanwithstandardmanualdevices
AT montezdianaf poweredbonemarrowbiopsyproceduresproducelargercorespecimenswithlesspaininlesstimethanwithstandardmanualdevices
AT pugatatianaa poweredbonemarrowbiopsyproceduresproducelargercorespecimenswithlesspaininlesstimethanwithstandardmanualdevices
AT brodiekime poweredbonemarrowbiopsyproceduresproducelargercorespecimenswithlesspaininlesstimethanwithstandardmanualdevices
AT cohenstephenc poweredbonemarrowbiopsyproceduresproducelargercorespecimenswithlesspaininlesstimethanwithstandardmanualdevices
AT spadaccinicathy poweredbonemarrowbiopsyproceduresproducelargercorespecimenswithlesspaininlesstimethanwithstandardmanualdevices
AT swordsronan poweredbonemarrowbiopsyproceduresproducelargercorespecimenswithlesspaininlesstimethanwithstandardmanualdevices
AT brennerandrewj poweredbonemarrowbiopsyproceduresproducelargercorespecimenswithlesspaininlesstimethanwithstandardmanualdevices