Cargando…
Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q)
BACKGROUND: A previous study has documented the reliability and validity of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) in exploring patient satisfaction with medicines for chronic health conditions in routine medical practice, but the minimally important difference (MID) of t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22014277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-142 |
_version_ | 1782219533845528576 |
---|---|
author | Rejas, Javier Ruiz, Miguel A Pardo, Antonio Soto, Javier |
author_facet | Rejas, Javier Ruiz, Miguel A Pardo, Antonio Soto, Javier |
author_sort | Rejas, Javier |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A previous study has documented the reliability and validity of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) in exploring patient satisfaction with medicines for chronic health conditions in routine medical practice, but the minimally important difference (MID) of this tool is as yet unknown. The objective of this research was to estimate the MID for the SATMED-Q total score and six constituent domains. METHODS: The sample of patients (456 subjects, mean age 59 years, 53% male) used for testing psychometric properties was also used to assess MID. Item #14 of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) was used as an anchor reference since it directly explores satisfaction with medicine on a 7-point ordinal scale (from extremely satisfied to extremely dissatisfied, with a neutral category). Patients were classified into four categories according to responses to this item (extremely satisfied/dissatisfied, very satisfied/dissatisfied, satisfied/dissatisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (neutral), and calculations were made for the total score and each domain of the SATMED-Q using standardised scores. The mean absolute differences in total score (and domains) between the neutral category and the satisfied/dissatisfied category were considered to be the MID. Effect sizes (ES) were also computed. RESULTS: The MID for the total score was 13.4 (ES = 0.91), while the domain values ranged from 10.3 (medical care domain, ES = 0.43) to 20.6 (impact on daily living, ES = 0.85). Mean differences in satisfaction (as measured by the total SATMED-Q score and domain scores) using the levels of satisfaction established by item #14 were significantly different, with F values ranging from 12.2 to 88.8 (p < 0.001 in all cases). CONCLUSION: The SATMED-Q was demonstrated to be responsive to different levels of patient satisfaction with therapy in chronically ill subjects. The MID obtained was 13.4 points for the overall normalised scoring scale, and between 10.3 and 20.6 points for domains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3241617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32416172011-12-17 Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) Rejas, Javier Ruiz, Miguel A Pardo, Antonio Soto, Javier BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: A previous study has documented the reliability and validity of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) in exploring patient satisfaction with medicines for chronic health conditions in routine medical practice, but the minimally important difference (MID) of this tool is as yet unknown. The objective of this research was to estimate the MID for the SATMED-Q total score and six constituent domains. METHODS: The sample of patients (456 subjects, mean age 59 years, 53% male) used for testing psychometric properties was also used to assess MID. Item #14 of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) was used as an anchor reference since it directly explores satisfaction with medicine on a 7-point ordinal scale (from extremely satisfied to extremely dissatisfied, with a neutral category). Patients were classified into four categories according to responses to this item (extremely satisfied/dissatisfied, very satisfied/dissatisfied, satisfied/dissatisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied (neutral), and calculations were made for the total score and each domain of the SATMED-Q using standardised scores. The mean absolute differences in total score (and domains) between the neutral category and the satisfied/dissatisfied category were considered to be the MID. Effect sizes (ES) were also computed. RESULTS: The MID for the total score was 13.4 (ES = 0.91), while the domain values ranged from 10.3 (medical care domain, ES = 0.43) to 20.6 (impact on daily living, ES = 0.85). Mean differences in satisfaction (as measured by the total SATMED-Q score and domain scores) using the levels of satisfaction established by item #14 were significantly different, with F values ranging from 12.2 to 88.8 (p < 0.001 in all cases). CONCLUSION: The SATMED-Q was demonstrated to be responsive to different levels of patient satisfaction with therapy in chronically ill subjects. The MID obtained was 13.4 points for the overall normalised scoring scale, and between 10.3 and 20.6 points for domains. BioMed Central 2011-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3241617/ /pubmed/22014277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-142 Text en Copyright ©2011 Rejas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rejas, Javier Ruiz, Miguel A Pardo, Antonio Soto, Javier Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) |
title | Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) |
title_full | Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) |
title_fullStr | Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) |
title_short | Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) |
title_sort | minimally important difference of the treatment satisfaction with medicines questionnaire (satmed-q) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22014277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rejasjavier minimallyimportantdifferenceofthetreatmentsatisfactionwithmedicinesquestionnairesatmedq AT ruizmiguela minimallyimportantdifferenceofthetreatmentsatisfactionwithmedicinesquestionnairesatmedq AT pardoantonio minimallyimportantdifferenceofthetreatmentsatisfactionwithmedicinesquestionnairesatmedq AT sotojavier minimallyimportantdifferenceofthetreatmentsatisfactionwithmedicinesquestionnairesatmedq |