Cargando…

Assessing Quality of Care of Elderly Patients Using the ACOVE Quality Indicator Set: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Care of the elderly is recognized as an increasingly important segment of health care. The Assessing Care Of Vulnerable Elderly (ACOVE) quality indicators (QIs) were developed to assess and improve the care of elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review is to summarize studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Askari, Marjan, Wierenga, Peter C., Eslami, Saied, Medlock, Stephanie, de Rooij, Sophia E., Abu-Hanna, Ameen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22194872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028631
_version_ 1782219550166614016
author Askari, Marjan
Wierenga, Peter C.
Eslami, Saied
Medlock, Stephanie
de Rooij, Sophia E.
Abu-Hanna, Ameen
author_facet Askari, Marjan
Wierenga, Peter C.
Eslami, Saied
Medlock, Stephanie
de Rooij, Sophia E.
Abu-Hanna, Ameen
author_sort Askari, Marjan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Care of the elderly is recognized as an increasingly important segment of health care. The Assessing Care Of Vulnerable Elderly (ACOVE) quality indicators (QIs) were developed to assess and improve the care of elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review is to summarize studies that assess the quality of care using QIs from or based on ACOVE, in order to evaluate the state of quality of care for the reported conditions. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL for English-language studies indexed by February 2010. Articles were included if they used any ACOVE QIs, or adaptations thereof, for assessing the quality of care. Included studies were analyzed and relevant information was extracted. We summarized the results of these studies, and when possible generated an overall conclusion about the quality of care as measured by ACOVE for each condition, in various settings, and for each QI. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included with 278 QIs (original, adapted or newly developed). The quality scores showed large variation between and within conditions. Only a few conditions showed a stable pass rate range over multiple studies. Overall, pass rates for dementia (interquartile range (IQR): 11%–35%), depression (IQR: 27%–41%), osteoporosis (IQR: 34%–43%) and osteoarthritis (IQR: 29–41%) were notably low. Medication management and use (range: 81%–90%), hearing loss (77%–79%) and continuity of care (76%–80%) scored higher than other conditions. Out of the 278 QIs, 141 (50%) had mean pass rates below 50% and 121 QIs (44%) had pass rates above 50%. Twenty-three percent of the QIs scored above 75%, and 16% scored below 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care per condition varies markedly across studies. Although there has been much effort in improving the care for elderly patients in the last years, the reported quality of care according to the ACOVE indicators is still relatively low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3241679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32416792011-12-22 Assessing Quality of Care of Elderly Patients Using the ACOVE Quality Indicator Set: A Systematic Review Askari, Marjan Wierenga, Peter C. Eslami, Saied Medlock, Stephanie de Rooij, Sophia E. Abu-Hanna, Ameen PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Care of the elderly is recognized as an increasingly important segment of health care. The Assessing Care Of Vulnerable Elderly (ACOVE) quality indicators (QIs) were developed to assess and improve the care of elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review is to summarize studies that assess the quality of care using QIs from or based on ACOVE, in order to evaluate the state of quality of care for the reported conditions. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL for English-language studies indexed by February 2010. Articles were included if they used any ACOVE QIs, or adaptations thereof, for assessing the quality of care. Included studies were analyzed and relevant information was extracted. We summarized the results of these studies, and when possible generated an overall conclusion about the quality of care as measured by ACOVE for each condition, in various settings, and for each QI. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included with 278 QIs (original, adapted or newly developed). The quality scores showed large variation between and within conditions. Only a few conditions showed a stable pass rate range over multiple studies. Overall, pass rates for dementia (interquartile range (IQR): 11%–35%), depression (IQR: 27%–41%), osteoporosis (IQR: 34%–43%) and osteoarthritis (IQR: 29–41%) were notably low. Medication management and use (range: 81%–90%), hearing loss (77%–79%) and continuity of care (76%–80%) scored higher than other conditions. Out of the 278 QIs, 141 (50%) had mean pass rates below 50% and 121 QIs (44%) had pass rates above 50%. Twenty-three percent of the QIs scored above 75%, and 16% scored below 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care per condition varies markedly across studies. Although there has been much effort in improving the care for elderly patients in the last years, the reported quality of care according to the ACOVE indicators is still relatively low. Public Library of Science 2011-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3241679/ /pubmed/22194872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028631 Text en Askari et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Askari, Marjan
Wierenga, Peter C.
Eslami, Saied
Medlock, Stephanie
de Rooij, Sophia E.
Abu-Hanna, Ameen
Assessing Quality of Care of Elderly Patients Using the ACOVE Quality Indicator Set: A Systematic Review
title Assessing Quality of Care of Elderly Patients Using the ACOVE Quality Indicator Set: A Systematic Review
title_full Assessing Quality of Care of Elderly Patients Using the ACOVE Quality Indicator Set: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Assessing Quality of Care of Elderly Patients Using the ACOVE Quality Indicator Set: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Quality of Care of Elderly Patients Using the ACOVE Quality Indicator Set: A Systematic Review
title_short Assessing Quality of Care of Elderly Patients Using the ACOVE Quality Indicator Set: A Systematic Review
title_sort assessing quality of care of elderly patients using the acove quality indicator set: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22194872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028631
work_keys_str_mv AT askarimarjan assessingqualityofcareofelderlypatientsusingtheacovequalityindicatorsetasystematicreview
AT wierengapeterc assessingqualityofcareofelderlypatientsusingtheacovequalityindicatorsetasystematicreview
AT eslamisaied assessingqualityofcareofelderlypatientsusingtheacovequalityindicatorsetasystematicreview
AT medlockstephanie assessingqualityofcareofelderlypatientsusingtheacovequalityindicatorsetasystematicreview
AT derooijsophiae assessingqualityofcareofelderlypatientsusingtheacovequalityindicatorsetasystematicreview
AT abuhannaameen assessingqualityofcareofelderlypatientsusingtheacovequalityindicatorsetasystematicreview