Cargando…

Qualitative prediction of blood–brain barrier permeability on a large and refined dataset

The prediction of blood–brain barrier permeation is vitally important for the optimization of drugs targeting the central nervous system as well as for avoiding side effects of peripheral drugs. Following a previously proposed model on blood–brain barrier penetration, we calculated the cross-section...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muehlbacher, Markus, Spitzer, Gudrun M., Liedl, Klaus R., Kornhuber, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22109848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9478-1
_version_ 1782219566622965760
author Muehlbacher, Markus
Spitzer, Gudrun M.
Liedl, Klaus R.
Kornhuber, Johannes
author_facet Muehlbacher, Markus
Spitzer, Gudrun M.
Liedl, Klaus R.
Kornhuber, Johannes
author_sort Muehlbacher, Markus
collection PubMed
description The prediction of blood–brain barrier permeation is vitally important for the optimization of drugs targeting the central nervous system as well as for avoiding side effects of peripheral drugs. Following a previously proposed model on blood–brain barrier penetration, we calculated the cross-sectional area perpendicular to the amphiphilic axis. We obtained a high correlation between calculated and experimental cross-sectional area (r = 0.898, n = 32). Based on these results, we examined a correlation of the calculated cross-sectional area with blood–brain barrier penetration given by logBB values. We combined various literature data sets to form a large-scale logBB dataset with 362 experimental logBB values. Quantitative models were calculated using bootstrap validated multiple linear regression. Qualitative models were built by a bootstrapped random forest algorithm. Both methods found similar descriptors such as polar surface area, pKa, logP, charges and number of positive ionisable groups to be predictive for logBB. In contrast to our initial assumption, we were not able to obtain models with the cross-sectional area chosen as relevant parameter for both approaches. Comparing those two different techniques, qualitative random forest models are better suited for blood-brain barrier permeability prediction, especially when reducing the number of descriptors and using a large dataset. A random forest prediction system (n(trees) = 5) based on only four descriptors yields a validated accuracy of 88%. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9478-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3241963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32419632011-12-27 Qualitative prediction of blood–brain barrier permeability on a large and refined dataset Muehlbacher, Markus Spitzer, Gudrun M. Liedl, Klaus R. Kornhuber, Johannes J Comput Aided Mol Des Article The prediction of blood–brain barrier permeation is vitally important for the optimization of drugs targeting the central nervous system as well as for avoiding side effects of peripheral drugs. Following a previously proposed model on blood–brain barrier penetration, we calculated the cross-sectional area perpendicular to the amphiphilic axis. We obtained a high correlation between calculated and experimental cross-sectional area (r = 0.898, n = 32). Based on these results, we examined a correlation of the calculated cross-sectional area with blood–brain barrier penetration given by logBB values. We combined various literature data sets to form a large-scale logBB dataset with 362 experimental logBB values. Quantitative models were calculated using bootstrap validated multiple linear regression. Qualitative models were built by a bootstrapped random forest algorithm. Both methods found similar descriptors such as polar surface area, pKa, logP, charges and number of positive ionisable groups to be predictive for logBB. In contrast to our initial assumption, we were not able to obtain models with the cross-sectional area chosen as relevant parameter for both approaches. Comparing those two different techniques, qualitative random forest models are better suited for blood-brain barrier permeability prediction, especially when reducing the number of descriptors and using a large dataset. A random forest prediction system (n(trees) = 5) based on only four descriptors yields a validated accuracy of 88%. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10822-011-9478-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2011-11-23 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3241963/ /pubmed/22109848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9478-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Muehlbacher, Markus
Spitzer, Gudrun M.
Liedl, Klaus R.
Kornhuber, Johannes
Qualitative prediction of blood–brain barrier permeability on a large and refined dataset
title Qualitative prediction of blood–brain barrier permeability on a large and refined dataset
title_full Qualitative prediction of blood–brain barrier permeability on a large and refined dataset
title_fullStr Qualitative prediction of blood–brain barrier permeability on a large and refined dataset
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative prediction of blood–brain barrier permeability on a large and refined dataset
title_short Qualitative prediction of blood–brain barrier permeability on a large and refined dataset
title_sort qualitative prediction of blood–brain barrier permeability on a large and refined dataset
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3241963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22109848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9478-1
work_keys_str_mv AT muehlbachermarkus qualitativepredictionofbloodbrainbarrierpermeabilityonalargeandrefineddataset
AT spitzergudrunm qualitativepredictionofbloodbrainbarrierpermeabilityonalargeandrefineddataset
AT liedlklausr qualitativepredictionofbloodbrainbarrierpermeabilityonalargeandrefineddataset
AT kornhuberjohannes qualitativepredictionofbloodbrainbarrierpermeabilityonalargeandrefineddataset