Cargando…

Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases

BACKGROUND: Mammographic microcalcifications are associated with many benign lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive cancer. Careful assessment criteria are required to minimise benign biopsies while optimising cancer diagnosis. We wished to evaluate the assessment outcomes of microcal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farshid, G, Sullivan, T, Downey, P, Gill, P G, Pieterse, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3242612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22052156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.466
_version_ 1782219639426646016
author Farshid, G
Sullivan, T
Downey, P
Gill, P G
Pieterse, S
author_facet Farshid, G
Sullivan, T
Downey, P
Gill, P G
Pieterse, S
author_sort Farshid, G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mammographic microcalcifications are associated with many benign lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive cancer. Careful assessment criteria are required to minimise benign biopsies while optimising cancer diagnosis. We wished to evaluate the assessment outcomes of microcalcifications biopsied in the setting of population-based breast cancer screening. METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 2007, cases biopsied in which microcalcifications were the only imaging abnormality were included. Patient demographics, imaging features and final histology were subjected to statistical analysis to determine independent predictors of malignancy. RESULTS: In all, 2545 lesions, with a mean diameter of 21.8 mm (s.d. 23.8 mm) and observed in patients with a mean age of 57.7 years (s.d. 8.4 years), were included. Using the grading system adopted by the RANZCR, the grade was 3 in 47.7% 4 in 28.3% and 5 in 24.0%. After assessment, 1220 lesions (47.9%) were malignant (809 DCIS only, 411 DCIS with invasive cancer) and 1325 (52.1%) were non-malignant, including 122 (4.8%) premalignant lesions (lobular carcinoma in situ, atypical lobular hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia). Only 30.9% of the DCIS was of low grade. Mammographic extent of microcalcifications >15 mm, imaging grade, their pattern of distribution, presence of a palpable mass and detection after the first screening episode showed significant univariate associations with malignancy. On multivariate modeling imaging grade, mammographic extent of microcalcifications >15 mm, palpable mass and screening episode were retained as independent predictors of malignancy. Radiological grade had the largest effect with lesions of grade 4 and 5 being 2.2 and 3.3 times more likely to be malignant, respectively, than grade 3 lesions. CONCLUSION: The radiological grading scheme used throughout Australia and parts of Europe is validated as a useful system of stratifying microcalcifications into groups with significantly different risks of malignancy. Biopsy assessment of appropriately selected microcalcifications is an effective method of detecting invasive breast cancer and DCIS, particularly of non-low-grade subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3242612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32426122012-11-22 Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases Farshid, G Sullivan, T Downey, P Gill, P G Pieterse, S Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Mammographic microcalcifications are associated with many benign lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive cancer. Careful assessment criteria are required to minimise benign biopsies while optimising cancer diagnosis. We wished to evaluate the assessment outcomes of microcalcifications biopsied in the setting of population-based breast cancer screening. METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 2007, cases biopsied in which microcalcifications were the only imaging abnormality were included. Patient demographics, imaging features and final histology were subjected to statistical analysis to determine independent predictors of malignancy. RESULTS: In all, 2545 lesions, with a mean diameter of 21.8 mm (s.d. 23.8 mm) and observed in patients with a mean age of 57.7 years (s.d. 8.4 years), were included. Using the grading system adopted by the RANZCR, the grade was 3 in 47.7% 4 in 28.3% and 5 in 24.0%. After assessment, 1220 lesions (47.9%) were malignant (809 DCIS only, 411 DCIS with invasive cancer) and 1325 (52.1%) were non-malignant, including 122 (4.8%) premalignant lesions (lobular carcinoma in situ, atypical lobular hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia). Only 30.9% of the DCIS was of low grade. Mammographic extent of microcalcifications >15 mm, imaging grade, their pattern of distribution, presence of a palpable mass and detection after the first screening episode showed significant univariate associations with malignancy. On multivariate modeling imaging grade, mammographic extent of microcalcifications >15 mm, palpable mass and screening episode were retained as independent predictors of malignancy. Radiological grade had the largest effect with lesions of grade 4 and 5 being 2.2 and 3.3 times more likely to be malignant, respectively, than grade 3 lesions. CONCLUSION: The radiological grading scheme used throughout Australia and parts of Europe is validated as a useful system of stratifying microcalcifications into groups with significantly different risks of malignancy. Biopsy assessment of appropriately selected microcalcifications is an effective method of detecting invasive breast cancer and DCIS, particularly of non-low-grade subtypes. Nature Publishing Group 2011-11-22 2011-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3242612/ /pubmed/22052156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.466 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Farshid, G
Sullivan, T
Downey, P
Gill, P G
Pieterse, S
Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases
title Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases
title_full Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases
title_fullStr Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases
title_full_unstemmed Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases
title_short Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases
title_sort independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3242612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22052156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.466
work_keys_str_mv AT farshidg independentpredictorsofbreastmalignancyinscreendetectedmicrocalcificationsbiopsyresultsin2545cases
AT sullivant independentpredictorsofbreastmalignancyinscreendetectedmicrocalcificationsbiopsyresultsin2545cases
AT downeyp independentpredictorsofbreastmalignancyinscreendetectedmicrocalcificationsbiopsyresultsin2545cases
AT gillpg independentpredictorsofbreastmalignancyinscreendetectedmicrocalcificationsbiopsyresultsin2545cases
AT pieterses independentpredictorsofbreastmalignancyinscreendetectedmicrocalcificationsbiopsyresultsin2545cases