Cargando…

Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ulnar nerve injury may occur after pinning of supracondylar fractures in children. We describe the outcome and compare the rates of iatrogenic injuries to the ulnar nerve in a consecutive series of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children treated with either cros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eberl, Robert, Eder, Christian, Smolle, Elisabeth, Weinberg, Annelie M, Hoellwarth, Michael E, Singer, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3242959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21992087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.623574
_version_ 1782219658904993792
author Eberl, Robert
Eder, Christian
Smolle, Elisabeth
Weinberg, Annelie M
Hoellwarth, Michael E
Singer, Georg
author_facet Eberl, Robert
Eder, Christian
Smolle, Elisabeth
Weinberg, Annelie M
Hoellwarth, Michael E
Singer, Georg
author_sort Eberl, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ulnar nerve injury may occur after pinning of supracondylar fractures in children. We describe the outcome and compare the rates of iatrogenic injuries to the ulnar nerve in a consecutive series of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children treated with either crossed pinning or antegrade nailing. METHODS: Medical charts of all children sustaining this fracture treated at our department between 1994 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed regarding the mode of treatment, demographic data including age and sex, the time until implant removal, the outcome, and the rate of ulnar nerve injuries. RESULTS: 503 children (55% boys) with an average age of 6.5 years sustained a type-II, type-III, or type-IV supracondylar fracture. Of those, 440 children were included in the study. Antegrade nailing was performed in 264 (60%) of the children, and the others were treated with crossed pins. Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury occurred in 0.4% of the children treated with antegrade nailing and in 15% of the children treated with crossed pinning. After median 3 (1.6–12) years of follow-up, the clinical outcome was good and similar between the 2 groups. INTERPRETATION: Intramedullary antegrade nailing of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures can be considered an adequate and safe alternative to the widely performed crossed K-wire fixation. The risk of iatrogenic nerve injury after antegrade nailing is small compared to that after crossed pinning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3242959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32429592012-01-03 Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children Eberl, Robert Eder, Christian Smolle, Elisabeth Weinberg, Annelie M Hoellwarth, Michael E Singer, Georg Acta Orthop Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ulnar nerve injury may occur after pinning of supracondylar fractures in children. We describe the outcome and compare the rates of iatrogenic injuries to the ulnar nerve in a consecutive series of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children treated with either crossed pinning or antegrade nailing. METHODS: Medical charts of all children sustaining this fracture treated at our department between 1994 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed regarding the mode of treatment, demographic data including age and sex, the time until implant removal, the outcome, and the rate of ulnar nerve injuries. RESULTS: 503 children (55% boys) with an average age of 6.5 years sustained a type-II, type-III, or type-IV supracondylar fracture. Of those, 440 children were included in the study. Antegrade nailing was performed in 264 (60%) of the children, and the others were treated with crossed pins. Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury occurred in 0.4% of the children treated with antegrade nailing and in 15% of the children treated with crossed pinning. After median 3 (1.6–12) years of follow-up, the clinical outcome was good and similar between the 2 groups. INTERPRETATION: Intramedullary antegrade nailing of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures can be considered an adequate and safe alternative to the widely performed crossed K-wire fixation. The risk of iatrogenic nerve injury after antegrade nailing is small compared to that after crossed pinning. Informa Healthcare 2011-10 2011-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3242959/ /pubmed/21992087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.623574 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Article
Eberl, Robert
Eder, Christian
Smolle, Elisabeth
Weinberg, Annelie M
Hoellwarth, Michael E
Singer, Georg
Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children
title Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children
title_full Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children
title_fullStr Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children
title_full_unstemmed Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children
title_short Iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children
title_sort iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury after pin fixation and after antegrade nailing of supracondylar humeral fractures in children
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3242959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21992087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.623574
work_keys_str_mv AT eberlrobert iatrogeniculnarnerveinjuryafterpinfixationandafterantegradenailingofsupracondylarhumeralfracturesinchildren
AT ederchristian iatrogeniculnarnerveinjuryafterpinfixationandafterantegradenailingofsupracondylarhumeralfracturesinchildren
AT smolleelisabeth iatrogeniculnarnerveinjuryafterpinfixationandafterantegradenailingofsupracondylarhumeralfracturesinchildren
AT weinberganneliem iatrogeniculnarnerveinjuryafterpinfixationandafterantegradenailingofsupracondylarhumeralfracturesinchildren
AT hoellwarthmichaele iatrogeniculnarnerveinjuryafterpinfixationandafterantegradenailingofsupracondylarhumeralfracturesinchildren
AT singergeorg iatrogeniculnarnerveinjuryafterpinfixationandafterantegradenailingofsupracondylarhumeralfracturesinchildren