Cargando…

Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?

Until recently, it has been thought that under interocular suppression high-level visual processing is strongly inhibited if not abolished. With the development of continuous flash suppression (CFS), a variant of binocular rivalry, this notion has now been challenged by a number of reports showing t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stein, Timo, Hebart, Martin N., Sterzer, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3243089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22194718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00167
_version_ 1782219670576693248
author Stein, Timo
Hebart, Martin N.
Sterzer, Philipp
author_facet Stein, Timo
Hebart, Martin N.
Sterzer, Philipp
author_sort Stein, Timo
collection PubMed
description Until recently, it has been thought that under interocular suppression high-level visual processing is strongly inhibited if not abolished. With the development of continuous flash suppression (CFS), a variant of binocular rivalry, this notion has now been challenged by a number of reports showing that even high-level aspects of visual stimuli, such as familiarity, affect the time stimuli need to overcome CFS and emerge into awareness. In this “breaking continuous flash suppression” (b-CFS) paradigm, differential unconscious processing during suppression is inferred when (a) speeded detection responses to initially invisible stimuli differ, and (b) no comparable differences are found in non-rivalrous control conditions supposed to measure non-specific threshold differences between stimuli. The aim of the present study was to critically evaluate these assumptions. In six experiments we compared the detection of upright and inverted faces. We found that not only under CFS, but also in control conditions upright faces were detected faster and more accurately than inverted faces, although the effect was larger during CFS. However, reaction time (RT) distributions indicated critical differences between the CFS and the control condition. When RT distributions were matched, similar effect sizes were obtained in both conditions. Moreover, subjective ratings revealed that CFS and control conditions are not perceptually comparable. These findings cast doubt on the usefulness of non-rivalrous control conditions to rule out non-specific threshold differences as a cause of shorter detection latencies during CFS. Thus, at least in its present form, the b-CFS paradigm cannot provide unequivocal evidence for unconscious processing under interocular suppression. Nevertheless, our findings also demonstrate that the b-CFS paradigm can be fruitfully applied as a highly sensitive device to probe differences between stimuli in their potency to gain access to awareness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3243089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32430892011-12-22 Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression? Stein, Timo Hebart, Martin N. Sterzer, Philipp Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Until recently, it has been thought that under interocular suppression high-level visual processing is strongly inhibited if not abolished. With the development of continuous flash suppression (CFS), a variant of binocular rivalry, this notion has now been challenged by a number of reports showing that even high-level aspects of visual stimuli, such as familiarity, affect the time stimuli need to overcome CFS and emerge into awareness. In this “breaking continuous flash suppression” (b-CFS) paradigm, differential unconscious processing during suppression is inferred when (a) speeded detection responses to initially invisible stimuli differ, and (b) no comparable differences are found in non-rivalrous control conditions supposed to measure non-specific threshold differences between stimuli. The aim of the present study was to critically evaluate these assumptions. In six experiments we compared the detection of upright and inverted faces. We found that not only under CFS, but also in control conditions upright faces were detected faster and more accurately than inverted faces, although the effect was larger during CFS. However, reaction time (RT) distributions indicated critical differences between the CFS and the control condition. When RT distributions were matched, similar effect sizes were obtained in both conditions. Moreover, subjective ratings revealed that CFS and control conditions are not perceptually comparable. These findings cast doubt on the usefulness of non-rivalrous control conditions to rule out non-specific threshold differences as a cause of shorter detection latencies during CFS. Thus, at least in its present form, the b-CFS paradigm cannot provide unequivocal evidence for unconscious processing under interocular suppression. Nevertheless, our findings also demonstrate that the b-CFS paradigm can be fruitfully applied as a highly sensitive device to probe differences between stimuli in their potency to gain access to awareness. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3243089/ /pubmed/22194718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00167 Text en Copyright © 2011 Stein, Hebart and Sterzer. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Stein, Timo
Hebart, Martin N.
Sterzer, Philipp
Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?
title Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?
title_full Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?
title_fullStr Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?
title_full_unstemmed Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?
title_short Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression: A New Measure of Unconscious Processing during Interocular Suppression?
title_sort breaking continuous flash suppression: a new measure of unconscious processing during interocular suppression?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3243089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22194718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00167
work_keys_str_mv AT steintimo breakingcontinuousflashsuppressionanewmeasureofunconsciousprocessingduringinterocularsuppression
AT hebartmartinn breakingcontinuousflashsuppressionanewmeasureofunconsciousprocessingduringinterocularsuppression
AT sterzerphilipp breakingcontinuousflashsuppressionanewmeasureofunconsciousprocessingduringinterocularsuppression