Cargando…
Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers
FDA-cleared ovarian cancer biomarkers are limited to CA-125 and HE4 for monitoring and recurrence and OVA1, a multivariate panel consisting of CA-125 and four additional biomarkers, for referring patients to a specialist. Due to relatively poor performance of these tests, more accurate and broadly a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3244467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22216306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029533 |
_version_ | 1782219738893516800 |
---|---|
author | Yip, Ping Chen, Tzong-Hao Seshaiah, Partha Stephen, Laurie L. Michael-Ballard, Karri L. Mapes, James P. Mansfield, Brian C. Bertenshaw, Greg P. |
author_facet | Yip, Ping Chen, Tzong-Hao Seshaiah, Partha Stephen, Laurie L. Michael-Ballard, Karri L. Mapes, James P. Mansfield, Brian C. Bertenshaw, Greg P. |
author_sort | Yip, Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | FDA-cleared ovarian cancer biomarkers are limited to CA-125 and HE4 for monitoring and recurrence and OVA1, a multivariate panel consisting of CA-125 and four additional biomarkers, for referring patients to a specialist. Due to relatively poor performance of these tests, more accurate and broadly applicable biomarkers are needed. We evaluated the dysregulation of 259 candidate cancer markers in serum samples from 499 patients. Sera were collected prospectively at 11 monitored sites under a single well-defined protocol. All stages of ovarian cancer and common benign gynecological conditions were represented. To ensure consistency and comparability of biomarker comparisons, all measurements were performed on a single platform, at a single site, using a panel of rigorously calibrated, qualified, high-throughput, multiplexed immunoassays and all analyses were conducted using the same software. Each marker was evaluated independently for its ability to differentiate ovarian cancer from benign conditions. A total of 175 markers were dysregulated in the cancer samples. HE4 (AUC = 0.933) and CA-125 (AUC = 0.907) were the most informative biomarkers, followed by IL-2 receptor α, α1-antitrypsin, C-reactive protein, YKL-40, cellular fibronectin, CA-72-4 and prostasin (AUC>0.800). To improve the discrimination between cancer and benign conditions, a simple multivariate combination of markers was explored using logistic regression. When combined into a single panel, the nine most informative individual biomarkers yielded an AUC value of 0.950, significantly higher than obtained when combining the markers in the OVA1 panel (AUC 0.912). Additionally, at a threshold sensitivity of 90%, the combination of the top 9 markers gave 88.9% specificity compared to 63.4% specificity for the OVA1 markers. Although a blinded validation study has not yet been performed, these results indicate that alternative biomarker combinations might lead to significant improvements in the detection of ovarian cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3244467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32444672012-01-03 Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers Yip, Ping Chen, Tzong-Hao Seshaiah, Partha Stephen, Laurie L. Michael-Ballard, Karri L. Mapes, James P. Mansfield, Brian C. Bertenshaw, Greg P. PLoS One Research Article FDA-cleared ovarian cancer biomarkers are limited to CA-125 and HE4 for monitoring and recurrence and OVA1, a multivariate panel consisting of CA-125 and four additional biomarkers, for referring patients to a specialist. Due to relatively poor performance of these tests, more accurate and broadly applicable biomarkers are needed. We evaluated the dysregulation of 259 candidate cancer markers in serum samples from 499 patients. Sera were collected prospectively at 11 monitored sites under a single well-defined protocol. All stages of ovarian cancer and common benign gynecological conditions were represented. To ensure consistency and comparability of biomarker comparisons, all measurements were performed on a single platform, at a single site, using a panel of rigorously calibrated, qualified, high-throughput, multiplexed immunoassays and all analyses were conducted using the same software. Each marker was evaluated independently for its ability to differentiate ovarian cancer from benign conditions. A total of 175 markers were dysregulated in the cancer samples. HE4 (AUC = 0.933) and CA-125 (AUC = 0.907) were the most informative biomarkers, followed by IL-2 receptor α, α1-antitrypsin, C-reactive protein, YKL-40, cellular fibronectin, CA-72-4 and prostasin (AUC>0.800). To improve the discrimination between cancer and benign conditions, a simple multivariate combination of markers was explored using logistic regression. When combined into a single panel, the nine most informative individual biomarkers yielded an AUC value of 0.950, significantly higher than obtained when combining the markers in the OVA1 panel (AUC 0.912). Additionally, at a threshold sensitivity of 90%, the combination of the top 9 markers gave 88.9% specificity compared to 63.4% specificity for the OVA1 markers. Although a blinded validation study has not yet been performed, these results indicate that alternative biomarker combinations might lead to significant improvements in the detection of ovarian cancer. Public Library of Science 2011-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3244467/ /pubmed/22216306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029533 Text en Yip et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yip, Ping Chen, Tzong-Hao Seshaiah, Partha Stephen, Laurie L. Michael-Ballard, Karri L. Mapes, James P. Mansfield, Brian C. Bertenshaw, Greg P. Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers |
title | Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers |
title_full | Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers |
title_fullStr | Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers |
title_short | Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers |
title_sort | comprehensive serum profiling for the discovery of epithelial ovarian cancer biomarkers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3244467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22216306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029533 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yipping comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers AT chentzonghao comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers AT seshaiahpartha comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers AT stephenlauriel comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers AT michaelballardkarril comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers AT mapesjamesp comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers AT mansfieldbrianc comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers AT bertenshawgregp comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers |