Cargando…

Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers

FDA-cleared ovarian cancer biomarkers are limited to CA-125 and HE4 for monitoring and recurrence and OVA1, a multivariate panel consisting of CA-125 and four additional biomarkers, for referring patients to a specialist. Due to relatively poor performance of these tests, more accurate and broadly a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yip, Ping, Chen, Tzong-Hao, Seshaiah, Partha, Stephen, Laurie L., Michael-Ballard, Karri L., Mapes, James P., Mansfield, Brian C., Bertenshaw, Greg P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3244467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22216306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029533
_version_ 1782219738893516800
author Yip, Ping
Chen, Tzong-Hao
Seshaiah, Partha
Stephen, Laurie L.
Michael-Ballard, Karri L.
Mapes, James P.
Mansfield, Brian C.
Bertenshaw, Greg P.
author_facet Yip, Ping
Chen, Tzong-Hao
Seshaiah, Partha
Stephen, Laurie L.
Michael-Ballard, Karri L.
Mapes, James P.
Mansfield, Brian C.
Bertenshaw, Greg P.
author_sort Yip, Ping
collection PubMed
description FDA-cleared ovarian cancer biomarkers are limited to CA-125 and HE4 for monitoring and recurrence and OVA1, a multivariate panel consisting of CA-125 and four additional biomarkers, for referring patients to a specialist. Due to relatively poor performance of these tests, more accurate and broadly applicable biomarkers are needed. We evaluated the dysregulation of 259 candidate cancer markers in serum samples from 499 patients. Sera were collected prospectively at 11 monitored sites under a single well-defined protocol. All stages of ovarian cancer and common benign gynecological conditions were represented. To ensure consistency and comparability of biomarker comparisons, all measurements were performed on a single platform, at a single site, using a panel of rigorously calibrated, qualified, high-throughput, multiplexed immunoassays and all analyses were conducted using the same software. Each marker was evaluated independently for its ability to differentiate ovarian cancer from benign conditions. A total of 175 markers were dysregulated in the cancer samples. HE4 (AUC = 0.933) and CA-125 (AUC = 0.907) were the most informative biomarkers, followed by IL-2 receptor α, α1-antitrypsin, C-reactive protein, YKL-40, cellular fibronectin, CA-72-4 and prostasin (AUC>0.800). To improve the discrimination between cancer and benign conditions, a simple multivariate combination of markers was explored using logistic regression. When combined into a single panel, the nine most informative individual biomarkers yielded an AUC value of 0.950, significantly higher than obtained when combining the markers in the OVA1 panel (AUC 0.912). Additionally, at a threshold sensitivity of 90%, the combination of the top 9 markers gave 88.9% specificity compared to 63.4% specificity for the OVA1 markers. Although a blinded validation study has not yet been performed, these results indicate that alternative biomarker combinations might lead to significant improvements in the detection of ovarian cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3244467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32444672012-01-03 Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers Yip, Ping Chen, Tzong-Hao Seshaiah, Partha Stephen, Laurie L. Michael-Ballard, Karri L. Mapes, James P. Mansfield, Brian C. Bertenshaw, Greg P. PLoS One Research Article FDA-cleared ovarian cancer biomarkers are limited to CA-125 and HE4 for monitoring and recurrence and OVA1, a multivariate panel consisting of CA-125 and four additional biomarkers, for referring patients to a specialist. Due to relatively poor performance of these tests, more accurate and broadly applicable biomarkers are needed. We evaluated the dysregulation of 259 candidate cancer markers in serum samples from 499 patients. Sera were collected prospectively at 11 monitored sites under a single well-defined protocol. All stages of ovarian cancer and common benign gynecological conditions were represented. To ensure consistency and comparability of biomarker comparisons, all measurements were performed on a single platform, at a single site, using a panel of rigorously calibrated, qualified, high-throughput, multiplexed immunoassays and all analyses were conducted using the same software. Each marker was evaluated independently for its ability to differentiate ovarian cancer from benign conditions. A total of 175 markers were dysregulated in the cancer samples. HE4 (AUC = 0.933) and CA-125 (AUC = 0.907) were the most informative biomarkers, followed by IL-2 receptor α, α1-antitrypsin, C-reactive protein, YKL-40, cellular fibronectin, CA-72-4 and prostasin (AUC>0.800). To improve the discrimination between cancer and benign conditions, a simple multivariate combination of markers was explored using logistic regression. When combined into a single panel, the nine most informative individual biomarkers yielded an AUC value of 0.950, significantly higher than obtained when combining the markers in the OVA1 panel (AUC 0.912). Additionally, at a threshold sensitivity of 90%, the combination of the top 9 markers gave 88.9% specificity compared to 63.4% specificity for the OVA1 markers. Although a blinded validation study has not yet been performed, these results indicate that alternative biomarker combinations might lead to significant improvements in the detection of ovarian cancer. Public Library of Science 2011-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3244467/ /pubmed/22216306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029533 Text en Yip et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yip, Ping
Chen, Tzong-Hao
Seshaiah, Partha
Stephen, Laurie L.
Michael-Ballard, Karri L.
Mapes, James P.
Mansfield, Brian C.
Bertenshaw, Greg P.
Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers
title Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers
title_full Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers
title_fullStr Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers
title_short Comprehensive Serum Profiling for the Discovery of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers
title_sort comprehensive serum profiling for the discovery of epithelial ovarian cancer biomarkers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3244467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22216306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029533
work_keys_str_mv AT yipping comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers
AT chentzonghao comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers
AT seshaiahpartha comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers
AT stephenlauriel comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers
AT michaelballardkarril comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers
AT mapesjamesp comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers
AT mansfieldbrianc comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers
AT bertenshawgregp comprehensiveserumprofilingforthediscoveryofepithelialovariancancerbiomarkers