Cargando…

Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden

INTRODUCTION: Accurate quantification of mycobacterial load is important for the evaluation of patient infectiousness, disease severity and monitoring treatment response in human and in-vitro laboratory models of disease. We hypothesized that newer techniques would perform as well as solid media cul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Zyl-Smit, Richard N., Binder, Anke, Meldau, Richard, Mishra, Hridesh, Semple, Patricia L., Theron, Grant, Peter, Jonathan, Whitelaw, Andrew, Sharma, Suren K., Warren, Robin, Bateman, Eric D., Dheda, Keertan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3245241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22216117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028815
_version_ 1782219827627163648
author van Zyl-Smit, Richard N.
Binder, Anke
Meldau, Richard
Mishra, Hridesh
Semple, Patricia L.
Theron, Grant
Peter, Jonathan
Whitelaw, Andrew
Sharma, Suren K.
Warren, Robin
Bateman, Eric D.
Dheda, Keertan
author_facet van Zyl-Smit, Richard N.
Binder, Anke
Meldau, Richard
Mishra, Hridesh
Semple, Patricia L.
Theron, Grant
Peter, Jonathan
Whitelaw, Andrew
Sharma, Suren K.
Warren, Robin
Bateman, Eric D.
Dheda, Keertan
author_sort van Zyl-Smit, Richard N.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accurate quantification of mycobacterial load is important for the evaluation of patient infectiousness, disease severity and monitoring treatment response in human and in-vitro laboratory models of disease. We hypothesized that newer techniques would perform as well as solid media culture to quantify mycobacterial burden in laboratory specimens. METHODS: We compared the turn-around-time, detection-threshold, dynamic range, reproducibility, relative discriminative ability, of 4 mycobacterial load determination techniques: automated liquid culture (BACTEC-MGIT-960), [(3)H]-uracil incorporation assays, luciferase-reporter construct bioluminescence, and quantitative PCR(Xpert -MTB/RIF) using serial dilutions of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37RV. Mycobacterial colony-forming-units(CFU) using 7H10-Middlebrook solid media served as the reference standard. RESULTS: All 4 assays correlated well with the reference standard, however, bioluminescence and uracil assays had a detection threshold ≥1×10(3) organisms. By contrast, BACTEC-MGIT-960 liquid culture, although only providing results in days, was user-friendly, had the lowest detection threshold (<10 organisms), the greatest discriminative ability (1 vs. 10 organisms; p = 0.02), and the best reproducibility (coefficient of variance of 2% vs. 38% compared to uracil incorporation; p = 0.02). Xpert-MTB/RIF correlated well with mycobacterial load, had a rapid turn-around-time (<2 hours), was user friendly, but had a detection limit of ∼100 organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Choosing a technique to quantify mycobacterial burden for laboratory or clinical research depends on availability of resources and the question being addressed. Automated liquid culture has good discriminative ability and low detection threshold but results are only obtained in days. Xpert MTB/RIF provides rapid quantification of mycobacterial burden, but has a poorer discrimination and detection threshold.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3245241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32452412012-01-03 Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden van Zyl-Smit, Richard N. Binder, Anke Meldau, Richard Mishra, Hridesh Semple, Patricia L. Theron, Grant Peter, Jonathan Whitelaw, Andrew Sharma, Suren K. Warren, Robin Bateman, Eric D. Dheda, Keertan PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Accurate quantification of mycobacterial load is important for the evaluation of patient infectiousness, disease severity and monitoring treatment response in human and in-vitro laboratory models of disease. We hypothesized that newer techniques would perform as well as solid media culture to quantify mycobacterial burden in laboratory specimens. METHODS: We compared the turn-around-time, detection-threshold, dynamic range, reproducibility, relative discriminative ability, of 4 mycobacterial load determination techniques: automated liquid culture (BACTEC-MGIT-960), [(3)H]-uracil incorporation assays, luciferase-reporter construct bioluminescence, and quantitative PCR(Xpert -MTB/RIF) using serial dilutions of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37RV. Mycobacterial colony-forming-units(CFU) using 7H10-Middlebrook solid media served as the reference standard. RESULTS: All 4 assays correlated well with the reference standard, however, bioluminescence and uracil assays had a detection threshold ≥1×10(3) organisms. By contrast, BACTEC-MGIT-960 liquid culture, although only providing results in days, was user-friendly, had the lowest detection threshold (<10 organisms), the greatest discriminative ability (1 vs. 10 organisms; p = 0.02), and the best reproducibility (coefficient of variance of 2% vs. 38% compared to uracil incorporation; p = 0.02). Xpert-MTB/RIF correlated well with mycobacterial load, had a rapid turn-around-time (<2 hours), was user friendly, but had a detection limit of ∼100 organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Choosing a technique to quantify mycobacterial burden for laboratory or clinical research depends on availability of resources and the question being addressed. Automated liquid culture has good discriminative ability and low detection threshold but results are only obtained in days. Xpert MTB/RIF provides rapid quantification of mycobacterial burden, but has a poorer discrimination and detection threshold. Public Library of Science 2011-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3245241/ /pubmed/22216117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028815 Text en van Zyl-Smit et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Zyl-Smit, Richard N.
Binder, Anke
Meldau, Richard
Mishra, Hridesh
Semple, Patricia L.
Theron, Grant
Peter, Jonathan
Whitelaw, Andrew
Sharma, Suren K.
Warren, Robin
Bateman, Eric D.
Dheda, Keertan
Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden
title Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden
title_full Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden
title_fullStr Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden
title_short Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden
title_sort comparison of quantitative techniques including xpert mtb/rif to evaluate mycobacterial burden
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3245241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22216117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028815
work_keys_str_mv AT vanzylsmitrichardn comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden
AT binderanke comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden
AT meldaurichard comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden
AT mishrahridesh comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden
AT semplepatricial comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden
AT therongrant comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden
AT peterjonathan comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden
AT whitelawandrew comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden
AT sharmasurenk comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden
AT warrenrobin comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden
AT batemanericd comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden
AT dhedakeertan comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden