Cargando…
Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden
INTRODUCTION: Accurate quantification of mycobacterial load is important for the evaluation of patient infectiousness, disease severity and monitoring treatment response in human and in-vitro laboratory models of disease. We hypothesized that newer techniques would perform as well as solid media cul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3245241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22216117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028815 |
_version_ | 1782219827627163648 |
---|---|
author | van Zyl-Smit, Richard N. Binder, Anke Meldau, Richard Mishra, Hridesh Semple, Patricia L. Theron, Grant Peter, Jonathan Whitelaw, Andrew Sharma, Suren K. Warren, Robin Bateman, Eric D. Dheda, Keertan |
author_facet | van Zyl-Smit, Richard N. Binder, Anke Meldau, Richard Mishra, Hridesh Semple, Patricia L. Theron, Grant Peter, Jonathan Whitelaw, Andrew Sharma, Suren K. Warren, Robin Bateman, Eric D. Dheda, Keertan |
author_sort | van Zyl-Smit, Richard N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Accurate quantification of mycobacterial load is important for the evaluation of patient infectiousness, disease severity and monitoring treatment response in human and in-vitro laboratory models of disease. We hypothesized that newer techniques would perform as well as solid media culture to quantify mycobacterial burden in laboratory specimens. METHODS: We compared the turn-around-time, detection-threshold, dynamic range, reproducibility, relative discriminative ability, of 4 mycobacterial load determination techniques: automated liquid culture (BACTEC-MGIT-960), [(3)H]-uracil incorporation assays, luciferase-reporter construct bioluminescence, and quantitative PCR(Xpert -MTB/RIF) using serial dilutions of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37RV. Mycobacterial colony-forming-units(CFU) using 7H10-Middlebrook solid media served as the reference standard. RESULTS: All 4 assays correlated well with the reference standard, however, bioluminescence and uracil assays had a detection threshold ≥1×10(3) organisms. By contrast, BACTEC-MGIT-960 liquid culture, although only providing results in days, was user-friendly, had the lowest detection threshold (<10 organisms), the greatest discriminative ability (1 vs. 10 organisms; p = 0.02), and the best reproducibility (coefficient of variance of 2% vs. 38% compared to uracil incorporation; p = 0.02). Xpert-MTB/RIF correlated well with mycobacterial load, had a rapid turn-around-time (<2 hours), was user friendly, but had a detection limit of ∼100 organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Choosing a technique to quantify mycobacterial burden for laboratory or clinical research depends on availability of resources and the question being addressed. Automated liquid culture has good discriminative ability and low detection threshold but results are only obtained in days. Xpert MTB/RIF provides rapid quantification of mycobacterial burden, but has a poorer discrimination and detection threshold. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3245241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32452412012-01-03 Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden van Zyl-Smit, Richard N. Binder, Anke Meldau, Richard Mishra, Hridesh Semple, Patricia L. Theron, Grant Peter, Jonathan Whitelaw, Andrew Sharma, Suren K. Warren, Robin Bateman, Eric D. Dheda, Keertan PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Accurate quantification of mycobacterial load is important for the evaluation of patient infectiousness, disease severity and monitoring treatment response in human and in-vitro laboratory models of disease. We hypothesized that newer techniques would perform as well as solid media culture to quantify mycobacterial burden in laboratory specimens. METHODS: We compared the turn-around-time, detection-threshold, dynamic range, reproducibility, relative discriminative ability, of 4 mycobacterial load determination techniques: automated liquid culture (BACTEC-MGIT-960), [(3)H]-uracil incorporation assays, luciferase-reporter construct bioluminescence, and quantitative PCR(Xpert -MTB/RIF) using serial dilutions of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37RV. Mycobacterial colony-forming-units(CFU) using 7H10-Middlebrook solid media served as the reference standard. RESULTS: All 4 assays correlated well with the reference standard, however, bioluminescence and uracil assays had a detection threshold ≥1×10(3) organisms. By contrast, BACTEC-MGIT-960 liquid culture, although only providing results in days, was user-friendly, had the lowest detection threshold (<10 organisms), the greatest discriminative ability (1 vs. 10 organisms; p = 0.02), and the best reproducibility (coefficient of variance of 2% vs. 38% compared to uracil incorporation; p = 0.02). Xpert-MTB/RIF correlated well with mycobacterial load, had a rapid turn-around-time (<2 hours), was user friendly, but had a detection limit of ∼100 organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Choosing a technique to quantify mycobacterial burden for laboratory or clinical research depends on availability of resources and the question being addressed. Automated liquid culture has good discriminative ability and low detection threshold but results are only obtained in days. Xpert MTB/RIF provides rapid quantification of mycobacterial burden, but has a poorer discrimination and detection threshold. Public Library of Science 2011-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3245241/ /pubmed/22216117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028815 Text en van Zyl-Smit et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Zyl-Smit, Richard N. Binder, Anke Meldau, Richard Mishra, Hridesh Semple, Patricia L. Theron, Grant Peter, Jonathan Whitelaw, Andrew Sharma, Suren K. Warren, Robin Bateman, Eric D. Dheda, Keertan Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden |
title | Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden |
title_full | Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden |
title_short | Comparison of Quantitative Techniques including Xpert MTB/RIF to Evaluate Mycobacterial Burden |
title_sort | comparison of quantitative techniques including xpert mtb/rif to evaluate mycobacterial burden |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3245241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22216117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028815 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanzylsmitrichardn comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden AT binderanke comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden AT meldaurichard comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden AT mishrahridesh comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden AT semplepatricial comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden AT therongrant comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden AT peterjonathan comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden AT whitelawandrew comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden AT sharmasurenk comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden AT warrenrobin comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden AT batemanericd comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden AT dhedakeertan comparisonofquantitativetechniquesincludingxpertmtbriftoevaluatemycobacterialburden |