Cargando…
Is cost-effectiveness analysis preferred to severity of disease as the main guiding principle in priority setting in resource poor settings? The case of Uganda
INTRODUCTION: Several studies carried out to establish the relative preference of cost-effectiveness of interventions and severity of disease as criteria for priority setting in health have shown a strong preference for severity of disease. These preferences may differ in contexts of resource scarci...
Autores principales: | Kapiriri, Lydia, Arnesen, Trude, Norheim, Ole Frithjof |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC324572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14711374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-2-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Combining evidence and values in priority setting: testing the balance sheet method in a low-income country
por: Makundi, Emmanuel, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
Priority setting: the importance of incorporating opportunity costs
por: Norheim, Ole Frithjof
Publicado: (2012) -
The unfunded priorities: an evaluation of priority setting for noncommunicable disease control in Uganda
por: Essue, Beverley M., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Beyond cost-effectiveness, morbidity and mortality: a comprehensive evaluation of priority setting for HIV programming in Uganda
por: Kapiriri, Lydia, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The quest for a framework for sustainable and institutionalised priority-setting for health research in a low-resource setting: the case of Zambia
por: Kapiriri, Lydia, et al.
Publicado: (2018)