Cargando…

Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis

BACKGROUND: Cochrane systematic reviews collate and summarise studies of the effects of healthcare interventions. The characteristics of these reviews and the meta-analyses and individual studies they contain provide insights into the nature of healthcare research and important context for the devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Davey, Jonathan, Turner, Rebecca M, Clarke, Mike J, Higgins, Julian PT
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2011
Materias:	Correspondence
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3247075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22114982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-160

Ejemplares similares

Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
por: Turner, Rebecca M, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews
por: Turner, Rebecca M., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The aprotinin saga and the risks of conducting meta-analyses on small randomised controlled trials – a critique of a Cochrane review
por: Rosén, Måns
Publicado: (2009)

Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics
por: Rhodes, Kirsty M., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Implications of analysing time-to-event outcomes as binary in meta-analysis: empirical evidence from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
por: Salika, Theodosia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data
por: Rhodes, Kirsty M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation
por: Savović, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Reporting of drug trial funding sources and author financial conflicts of interest in Cochrane and non-Cochrane meta-analyses: a cross-sectional study
por: Turner, Kimberly, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Are more observational studies being included in Cochrane Reviews?
por: Kongsted, Hans Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study
por: Savović, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Validity of a Cochrane Systematic Review and meta-analysis for determining the safety of vitamin E
por: Oliver, Christopher J., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A new large-scale meta-epidemiological study on bias in randomized trials using routinely collected risk-of-bias assessments by cochrane reviewers: results from the robes study
por: Savovic, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
por: Al Faleh, Khalid, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews
por: Jørgensen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
por: Bow, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews
por: Wuytack, Francesca, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

How the Cochrane Collaboration Is Responding to the Asian Tsunami
por: Tharyan, Prathap, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Cochrane systematic reviews as a source of information for practice and trials
por: Clarke, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Systematic Differences between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Meta-Analyses on the Same Topic: A Matched Pair Analysis
por: Useem, Johanna, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Online genetic databases informing human genome epidemiology
por: Frodsham, Angela J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

What is a clinical pathway? Refinement of an operational definition to identify clinical pathway studies for a Cochrane systematic review
por: Lawal, Adegboyega K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Citation of updated and co-published Cochrane Methodology Reviews
por: Zhu, Linlin, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial
por: Alderdice, Fiona, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
por: Higgins, Julian P T, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Assessment of the quality of reporting for treatment components in Cochrane reviews of acupuncture
por: Kim, Kun Hyung, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evaluating the effects of maternal positions in childbirth: An overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Kibuka, Marion, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Learning from Cochrane systematic reviews: what improvements do these suggest for the design of trials?
por: Pirosca, Stefania, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
por: McKenzie, Joanne E, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses
por: Kontopantelis, Evangelos, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Age-treatment subgroup analyses in Cochrane intervention reviews: a meta-epidemiological study
por: Liu, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A meta-epidemiological study of subgroup analyses in cochrane systematic reviews of atrial fibrillation
por: Paquette, Miney, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate meta‐analyses in Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth reviews with multiple binary outcomes
por: Price, Malcolm J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Avoiding the distant elephant: a model to approach the research component of specialization
por: Aldous, Colleen, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Empty Reviews: A Description and Consideration of Cochrane Systematic Reviews with No Included Studies
por: Yaffe, Joanne, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Importance of Meta-analyses for Evaluating Carcinogens
por: Kogevinas, Manolis, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Alexander Cochran
Publicado: (1924)

Cochrane Pflegeforum
por: Legenstein, Karin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cochrane Pflegeforum
por: Djukic, Dejan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cochrane Cameroon: bringing Cochrane to francophone sub-Saharan Africa
por: Mbuagbaw, Lawrence, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_5mjn4172r4h7v707ag78iojc14