Cargando…

Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Although prompt initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for the control of invasive Candida infections and an improvement of prognosis, early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis remains a challenge and criteria for starting empirical antifungal therapy in ICU patients a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leroy, Guillaume, Lambiotte, Fabien, Thévenin, Didier, Lemaire, Christian, Parmentier, Erika, Devos, Patrick, Leroy, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3247094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22128895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-50
_version_ 1782220040870821888
author Leroy, Guillaume
Lambiotte, Fabien
Thévenin, Didier
Lemaire, Christian
Parmentier, Erika
Devos, Patrick
Leroy, Olivier
author_facet Leroy, Guillaume
Lambiotte, Fabien
Thévenin, Didier
Lemaire, Christian
Parmentier, Erika
Devos, Patrick
Leroy, Olivier
author_sort Leroy, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although prompt initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for the control of invasive Candida infections and an improvement of prognosis, early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis remains a challenge and criteria for starting empirical antifungal therapy in ICU patients are poorly defined. Some scoring systems, such as the "Candida score" could help physicians to differentiate patients who could benefit from early antifungal treatment from those for whom invasive candidiasis is highly improbable. This study evaluated the performance of this score in a cohort of critically ill patients. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study was conducted from January 2010 to March 2011 in five intensive care units in Nord-Pas de Calais, an area from North of France. All patients exhibiting, on ICU admission or during their ICU stay, a hospital-acquired severe sepsis or septic shock could be included in this study. The data collected included patient characteristics on ICU admission and at the onset of severe sepsis or septic shock. The "Candida score" was calculated at the onset of sepsis or shock. The incidence of invasive candidiasis was determined and its relationship with the value of the "Candida score" was studied. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were studied. When severe sepsis or shock occurred, 44 patients had a score = 2, 29 patients had a score = 3, 17 patients had a score = 4, and 4 patients had a score = 5. Invasive candidiasis was observed in five (5.3%) patients. One patient had candidemia, three patients had peritonitis, and one patient had pleural infection. The rates of invasive candidiasis was 0% in patients with score = 2 or 3, 17.6% in patients with score = 4, and 50% in patients with score = 5 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that the "Candida score" is an interesting tool to differentiate among ICU patients who exhibit hospital-acquired severe sepsis or septic shock those would benefit from early antifungal treatment (score > 3) from those for whom invasive candidiasis is highly improbable (score ≤ 3).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3247094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32470942011-12-30 Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study Leroy, Guillaume Lambiotte, Fabien Thévenin, Didier Lemaire, Christian Parmentier, Erika Devos, Patrick Leroy, Olivier Ann Intensive Care Research INTRODUCTION: Although prompt initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for the control of invasive Candida infections and an improvement of prognosis, early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis remains a challenge and criteria for starting empirical antifungal therapy in ICU patients are poorly defined. Some scoring systems, such as the "Candida score" could help physicians to differentiate patients who could benefit from early antifungal treatment from those for whom invasive candidiasis is highly improbable. This study evaluated the performance of this score in a cohort of critically ill patients. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study was conducted from January 2010 to March 2011 in five intensive care units in Nord-Pas de Calais, an area from North of France. All patients exhibiting, on ICU admission or during their ICU stay, a hospital-acquired severe sepsis or septic shock could be included in this study. The data collected included patient characteristics on ICU admission and at the onset of severe sepsis or septic shock. The "Candida score" was calculated at the onset of sepsis or shock. The incidence of invasive candidiasis was determined and its relationship with the value of the "Candida score" was studied. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were studied. When severe sepsis or shock occurred, 44 patients had a score = 2, 29 patients had a score = 3, 17 patients had a score = 4, and 4 patients had a score = 5. Invasive candidiasis was observed in five (5.3%) patients. One patient had candidemia, three patients had peritonitis, and one patient had pleural infection. The rates of invasive candidiasis was 0% in patients with score = 2 or 3, 17.6% in patients with score = 4, and 50% in patients with score = 5 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that the "Candida score" is an interesting tool to differentiate among ICU patients who exhibit hospital-acquired severe sepsis or septic shock those would benefit from early antifungal treatment (score > 3) from those for whom invasive candidiasis is highly improbable (score ≤ 3). Springer 2011-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3247094/ /pubmed/22128895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-50 Text en Copyright ©2011 Leroy et al; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Leroy, Guillaume
Lambiotte, Fabien
Thévenin, Didier
Lemaire, Christian
Parmentier, Erika
Devos, Patrick
Leroy, Olivier
Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study
title Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study
title_full Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study
title_fullStr Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study
title_short Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study
title_sort evaluation of "candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3247094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22128895
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-50
work_keys_str_mv AT leroyguillaume evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy
AT lambiottefabien evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy
AT thevenindidier evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy
AT lemairechristian evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy
AT parmentiererika evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy
AT devospatrick evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy
AT leroyolivier evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy