Cargando…
Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study
INTRODUCTION: Although prompt initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for the control of invasive Candida infections and an improvement of prognosis, early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis remains a challenge and criteria for starting empirical antifungal therapy in ICU patients a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3247094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22128895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-50 |
_version_ | 1782220040870821888 |
---|---|
author | Leroy, Guillaume Lambiotte, Fabien Thévenin, Didier Lemaire, Christian Parmentier, Erika Devos, Patrick Leroy, Olivier |
author_facet | Leroy, Guillaume Lambiotte, Fabien Thévenin, Didier Lemaire, Christian Parmentier, Erika Devos, Patrick Leroy, Olivier |
author_sort | Leroy, Guillaume |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Although prompt initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for the control of invasive Candida infections and an improvement of prognosis, early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis remains a challenge and criteria for starting empirical antifungal therapy in ICU patients are poorly defined. Some scoring systems, such as the "Candida score" could help physicians to differentiate patients who could benefit from early antifungal treatment from those for whom invasive candidiasis is highly improbable. This study evaluated the performance of this score in a cohort of critically ill patients. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study was conducted from January 2010 to March 2011 in five intensive care units in Nord-Pas de Calais, an area from North of France. All patients exhibiting, on ICU admission or during their ICU stay, a hospital-acquired severe sepsis or septic shock could be included in this study. The data collected included patient characteristics on ICU admission and at the onset of severe sepsis or septic shock. The "Candida score" was calculated at the onset of sepsis or shock. The incidence of invasive candidiasis was determined and its relationship with the value of the "Candida score" was studied. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were studied. When severe sepsis or shock occurred, 44 patients had a score = 2, 29 patients had a score = 3, 17 patients had a score = 4, and 4 patients had a score = 5. Invasive candidiasis was observed in five (5.3%) patients. One patient had candidemia, three patients had peritonitis, and one patient had pleural infection. The rates of invasive candidiasis was 0% in patients with score = 2 or 3, 17.6% in patients with score = 4, and 50% in patients with score = 5 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that the "Candida score" is an interesting tool to differentiate among ICU patients who exhibit hospital-acquired severe sepsis or septic shock those would benefit from early antifungal treatment (score > 3) from those for whom invasive candidiasis is highly improbable (score ≤ 3). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3247094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32470942011-12-30 Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study Leroy, Guillaume Lambiotte, Fabien Thévenin, Didier Lemaire, Christian Parmentier, Erika Devos, Patrick Leroy, Olivier Ann Intensive Care Research INTRODUCTION: Although prompt initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for the control of invasive Candida infections and an improvement of prognosis, early diagnosis of invasive candidiasis remains a challenge and criteria for starting empirical antifungal therapy in ICU patients are poorly defined. Some scoring systems, such as the "Candida score" could help physicians to differentiate patients who could benefit from early antifungal treatment from those for whom invasive candidiasis is highly improbable. This study evaluated the performance of this score in a cohort of critically ill patients. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter, cohort study was conducted from January 2010 to March 2011 in five intensive care units in Nord-Pas de Calais, an area from North of France. All patients exhibiting, on ICU admission or during their ICU stay, a hospital-acquired severe sepsis or septic shock could be included in this study. The data collected included patient characteristics on ICU admission and at the onset of severe sepsis or septic shock. The "Candida score" was calculated at the onset of sepsis or shock. The incidence of invasive candidiasis was determined and its relationship with the value of the "Candida score" was studied. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were studied. When severe sepsis or shock occurred, 44 patients had a score = 2, 29 patients had a score = 3, 17 patients had a score = 4, and 4 patients had a score = 5. Invasive candidiasis was observed in five (5.3%) patients. One patient had candidemia, three patients had peritonitis, and one patient had pleural infection. The rates of invasive candidiasis was 0% in patients with score = 2 or 3, 17.6% in patients with score = 4, and 50% in patients with score = 5 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that the "Candida score" is an interesting tool to differentiate among ICU patients who exhibit hospital-acquired severe sepsis or septic shock those would benefit from early antifungal treatment (score > 3) from those for whom invasive candidiasis is highly improbable (score ≤ 3). Springer 2011-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3247094/ /pubmed/22128895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-50 Text en Copyright ©2011 Leroy et al; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Leroy, Guillaume Lambiotte, Fabien Thévenin, Didier Lemaire, Christian Parmentier, Erika Devos, Patrick Leroy, Olivier Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study |
title | Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study |
title_full | Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study |
title_short | Evaluation of "Candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study |
title_sort | evaluation of "candida score" in critically ill patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3247094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22128895 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-50 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leroyguillaume evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy AT lambiottefabien evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy AT thevenindidier evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy AT lemairechristian evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy AT parmentiererika evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy AT devospatrick evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy AT leroyolivier evaluationofcandidascoreincriticallyillpatientsaprospectivemulticenterobservationalcohortstudy |