Cargando…

Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Objective: To compare the risk of placenta previa at second birth among women who had a cesarean section (CS) at first birth with women who delivered vaginally. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 399,674 women who gave birth to a singleton first and second baby between April 2000 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurol-Urganci, Ipek, Cromwell, David A, Edozien, Leroy C, Smith, Gordon CS, Onwere, Chidimma, Mahmood, Tahir A, Templeton, Allan, van der Meulen, Jan H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3247856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22103697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-95
_version_ 1782220180691091456
author Gurol-Urganci, Ipek
Cromwell, David A
Edozien, Leroy C
Smith, Gordon CS
Onwere, Chidimma
Mahmood, Tahir A
Templeton, Allan
van der Meulen, Jan H
author_facet Gurol-Urganci, Ipek
Cromwell, David A
Edozien, Leroy C
Smith, Gordon CS
Onwere, Chidimma
Mahmood, Tahir A
Templeton, Allan
van der Meulen, Jan H
author_sort Gurol-Urganci, Ipek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Objective: To compare the risk of placenta previa at second birth among women who had a cesarean section (CS) at first birth with women who delivered vaginally. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 399,674 women who gave birth to a singleton first and second baby between April 2000 and February 2009 in England. Multiple logistic regression was used to adjust the estimates for maternal age, ethnicity, deprivation, placenta previa at first birth, inter-birth interval and pregnancy complications. In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis of the reported results in peer-reviewed articles since 1980. RESULTS: The rate of placenta previa at second birth for women with vaginal first births was 4.4 per 1000 births, compared to 8.7 per 1000 births for women with CS at first birth. After adjustment, CS at first birth remained associated with an increased risk of placenta previa (odds ratio = 1.60; 95% CI 1.44 to 1.76). In the meta-analysis of 37 previously published studies from 21 countries, the overall pooled random effects odds ratio was 2.20 (95% CI 1.96-2.46). Our results from the current study is consistent with those of the meta-analysis as the pooled odds ratio for the six population-based cohort studies that analyzed second births only was 1.51 (95% CI 1.39-1.65). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of placenta previa in the subsequent pregnancy after CS delivery at first birth, but the risk is lower than previously estimated. Given the placenta previa rate in England and the adjusted effect of previous CS, 359 deliveries by CS at first birth would result in one additional case of placenta previa in the next pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3247856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32478562011-12-30 Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis Gurol-Urganci, Ipek Cromwell, David A Edozien, Leroy C Smith, Gordon CS Onwere, Chidimma Mahmood, Tahir A Templeton, Allan van der Meulen, Jan H BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Objective: To compare the risk of placenta previa at second birth among women who had a cesarean section (CS) at first birth with women who delivered vaginally. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 399,674 women who gave birth to a singleton first and second baby between April 2000 and February 2009 in England. Multiple logistic regression was used to adjust the estimates for maternal age, ethnicity, deprivation, placenta previa at first birth, inter-birth interval and pregnancy complications. In addition, we conducted a meta-analysis of the reported results in peer-reviewed articles since 1980. RESULTS: The rate of placenta previa at second birth for women with vaginal first births was 4.4 per 1000 births, compared to 8.7 per 1000 births for women with CS at first birth. After adjustment, CS at first birth remained associated with an increased risk of placenta previa (odds ratio = 1.60; 95% CI 1.44 to 1.76). In the meta-analysis of 37 previously published studies from 21 countries, the overall pooled random effects odds ratio was 2.20 (95% CI 1.96-2.46). Our results from the current study is consistent with those of the meta-analysis as the pooled odds ratio for the six population-based cohort studies that analyzed second births only was 1.51 (95% CI 1.39-1.65). CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of placenta previa in the subsequent pregnancy after CS delivery at first birth, but the risk is lower than previously estimated. Given the placenta previa rate in England and the adjusted effect of previous CS, 359 deliveries by CS at first birth would result in one additional case of placenta previa in the next pregnancy. BioMed Central 2011-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3247856/ /pubmed/22103697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-95 Text en Copyright ©2011 Gurol-Urganci et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gurol-Urganci, Ipek
Cromwell, David A
Edozien, Leroy C
Smith, Gordon CS
Onwere, Chidimma
Mahmood, Tahir A
Templeton, Allan
van der Meulen, Jan H
Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis
title Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis
title_full Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis
title_short Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis
title_sort risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3247856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22103697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-95
work_keys_str_mv AT gurolurganciipek riskofplacentapreviainsecondbirthafterfirstbirthcesareansectionapopulationbasedstudyandmetaanalysis
AT cromwelldavida riskofplacentapreviainsecondbirthafterfirstbirthcesareansectionapopulationbasedstudyandmetaanalysis
AT edozienleroyc riskofplacentapreviainsecondbirthafterfirstbirthcesareansectionapopulationbasedstudyandmetaanalysis
AT smithgordoncs riskofplacentapreviainsecondbirthafterfirstbirthcesareansectionapopulationbasedstudyandmetaanalysis
AT onwerechidimma riskofplacentapreviainsecondbirthafterfirstbirthcesareansectionapopulationbasedstudyandmetaanalysis
AT mahmoodtahira riskofplacentapreviainsecondbirthafterfirstbirthcesareansectionapopulationbasedstudyandmetaanalysis
AT templetonallan riskofplacentapreviainsecondbirthafterfirstbirthcesareansectionapopulationbasedstudyandmetaanalysis
AT vandermeulenjanh riskofplacentapreviainsecondbirthafterfirstbirthcesareansectionapopulationbasedstudyandmetaanalysis