Cargando…
The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches
BACKGROUND: The availability of well-annotated prostate tissue samples through biobanks is key for research. Whereas fresh-frozen tissue is well suited for a broad spectrum of molecular analyses, its storage and handling is complex and cost-intensive. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens (FFPE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22151117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-511 |
_version_ | 1782220232384839680 |
---|---|
author | Braun, Martin Menon, Roopika Nikolov, Pavel Kirsten, Robert Petersen, Karen Schilling, David Schott, Christina Gündisch, Sibylle Fend, Falko Becker, Karl-Friedrich Perner, Sven |
author_facet | Braun, Martin Menon, Roopika Nikolov, Pavel Kirsten, Robert Petersen, Karen Schilling, David Schott, Christina Gündisch, Sibylle Fend, Falko Becker, Karl-Friedrich Perner, Sven |
author_sort | Braun, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The availability of well-annotated prostate tissue samples through biobanks is key for research. Whereas fresh-frozen tissue is well suited for a broad spectrum of molecular analyses, its storage and handling is complex and cost-intensive. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens (FFPE) are easy to handle and economic to store, but their applicability for molecular methods is restricted. The recently introduced Hepes-glutamic acid-buffer mediated Organic solvent Protection Effect (HOPE) is a promising alternative, which might have the potential to unite the benefits of FFPE and fresh-frozen specimen. Aim of the study was to compare HOPE-fixed, FFPE and fresh-frozen bio-specimens for their accessibility for diagnostic and research purposes. METHODS: 10 prostate cancer samples were each preserved with HOPE, formalin, and liquid nitrogen and studied with in-situ and molecular methods. Samples were H&E stained, and assessed by immunohistochemistry (i.e. PSA, GOLPH2, p63) and FISH (i.e. ERG rearrangement). We assessed DNA integrity by PCR, using control genes ranging from 100 to 600 bp amplicon size. RNA integrity was assessed through qRT-PCR on three housekeeping genes (TBP, GAPDH, β-actin). Protein expression was analysed by performing western blot analysis using GOLPH2 and PSA antibodies. RESULTS: Of the HOPE samples, morphologic quality of H&E sections, immunohistochemical staining, and the FISH assay was at least equal to FFPE tissue, and significantly better than the fresh-frozen specimens. DNA, RNA, and protein analysis of HOPE samples provided similar results as compared to fresh-frozen specimens. As expected, FFPE-samples were inferior for most of the molecular analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study, comparatively assessing the suitability of these fixation methods for diagnostic and research utilization. Overall, HOPE-fixed bio-specimens combine the benefits of FFPE- and fresh-frozen samples. Results of this study have the potential to expand on contemporary prostate tissue biobanking approaches and can serve as a model for other organs and tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3248383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32483832011-12-30 The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches Braun, Martin Menon, Roopika Nikolov, Pavel Kirsten, Robert Petersen, Karen Schilling, David Schott, Christina Gündisch, Sibylle Fend, Falko Becker, Karl-Friedrich Perner, Sven BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The availability of well-annotated prostate tissue samples through biobanks is key for research. Whereas fresh-frozen tissue is well suited for a broad spectrum of molecular analyses, its storage and handling is complex and cost-intensive. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens (FFPE) are easy to handle and economic to store, but their applicability for molecular methods is restricted. The recently introduced Hepes-glutamic acid-buffer mediated Organic solvent Protection Effect (HOPE) is a promising alternative, which might have the potential to unite the benefits of FFPE and fresh-frozen specimen. Aim of the study was to compare HOPE-fixed, FFPE and fresh-frozen bio-specimens for their accessibility for diagnostic and research purposes. METHODS: 10 prostate cancer samples were each preserved with HOPE, formalin, and liquid nitrogen and studied with in-situ and molecular methods. Samples were H&E stained, and assessed by immunohistochemistry (i.e. PSA, GOLPH2, p63) and FISH (i.e. ERG rearrangement). We assessed DNA integrity by PCR, using control genes ranging from 100 to 600 bp amplicon size. RNA integrity was assessed through qRT-PCR on three housekeeping genes (TBP, GAPDH, β-actin). Protein expression was analysed by performing western blot analysis using GOLPH2 and PSA antibodies. RESULTS: Of the HOPE samples, morphologic quality of H&E sections, immunohistochemical staining, and the FISH assay was at least equal to FFPE tissue, and significantly better than the fresh-frozen specimens. DNA, RNA, and protein analysis of HOPE samples provided similar results as compared to fresh-frozen specimens. As expected, FFPE-samples were inferior for most of the molecular analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study, comparatively assessing the suitability of these fixation methods for diagnostic and research utilization. Overall, HOPE-fixed bio-specimens combine the benefits of FFPE- and fresh-frozen samples. Results of this study have the potential to expand on contemporary prostate tissue biobanking approaches and can serve as a model for other organs and tumors. BioMed Central 2011-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3248383/ /pubmed/22151117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-511 Text en Copyright ©2011 Braun et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Braun, Martin Menon, Roopika Nikolov, Pavel Kirsten, Robert Petersen, Karen Schilling, David Schott, Christina Gündisch, Sibylle Fend, Falko Becker, Karl-Friedrich Perner, Sven The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches |
title | The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches |
title_full | The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches |
title_fullStr | The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches |
title_short | The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches |
title_sort | hope fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22151117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-511 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT braunmartin thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT menonroopika thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT nikolovpavel thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT kirstenrobert thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT petersenkaren thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT schillingdavid thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT schottchristina thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT gundischsibylle thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT fendfalko thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT beckerkarlfriedrich thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT pernersven thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT braunmartin hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT menonroopika hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT nikolovpavel hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT kirstenrobert hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT petersenkaren hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT schillingdavid hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT schottchristina hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT gundischsibylle hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT fendfalko hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT beckerkarlfriedrich hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches AT pernersven hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches |