Cargando…

The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches

BACKGROUND: The availability of well-annotated prostate tissue samples through biobanks is key for research. Whereas fresh-frozen tissue is well suited for a broad spectrum of molecular analyses, its storage and handling is complex and cost-intensive. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens (FFPE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braun, Martin, Menon, Roopika, Nikolov, Pavel, Kirsten, Robert, Petersen, Karen, Schilling, David, Schott, Christina, Gündisch, Sibylle, Fend, Falko, Becker, Karl-Friedrich, Perner, Sven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22151117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-511
_version_ 1782220232384839680
author Braun, Martin
Menon, Roopika
Nikolov, Pavel
Kirsten, Robert
Petersen, Karen
Schilling, David
Schott, Christina
Gündisch, Sibylle
Fend, Falko
Becker, Karl-Friedrich
Perner, Sven
author_facet Braun, Martin
Menon, Roopika
Nikolov, Pavel
Kirsten, Robert
Petersen, Karen
Schilling, David
Schott, Christina
Gündisch, Sibylle
Fend, Falko
Becker, Karl-Friedrich
Perner, Sven
author_sort Braun, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The availability of well-annotated prostate tissue samples through biobanks is key for research. Whereas fresh-frozen tissue is well suited for a broad spectrum of molecular analyses, its storage and handling is complex and cost-intensive. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens (FFPE) are easy to handle and economic to store, but their applicability for molecular methods is restricted. The recently introduced Hepes-glutamic acid-buffer mediated Organic solvent Protection Effect (HOPE) is a promising alternative, which might have the potential to unite the benefits of FFPE and fresh-frozen specimen. Aim of the study was to compare HOPE-fixed, FFPE and fresh-frozen bio-specimens for their accessibility for diagnostic and research purposes. METHODS: 10 prostate cancer samples were each preserved with HOPE, formalin, and liquid nitrogen and studied with in-situ and molecular methods. Samples were H&E stained, and assessed by immunohistochemistry (i.e. PSA, GOLPH2, p63) and FISH (i.e. ERG rearrangement). We assessed DNA integrity by PCR, using control genes ranging from 100 to 600 bp amplicon size. RNA integrity was assessed through qRT-PCR on three housekeeping genes (TBP, GAPDH, β-actin). Protein expression was analysed by performing western blot analysis using GOLPH2 and PSA antibodies. RESULTS: Of the HOPE samples, morphologic quality of H&E sections, immunohistochemical staining, and the FISH assay was at least equal to FFPE tissue, and significantly better than the fresh-frozen specimens. DNA, RNA, and protein analysis of HOPE samples provided similar results as compared to fresh-frozen specimens. As expected, FFPE-samples were inferior for most of the molecular analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study, comparatively assessing the suitability of these fixation methods for diagnostic and research utilization. Overall, HOPE-fixed bio-specimens combine the benefits of FFPE- and fresh-frozen samples. Results of this study have the potential to expand on contemporary prostate tissue biobanking approaches and can serve as a model for other organs and tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3248383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32483832011-12-30 The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches Braun, Martin Menon, Roopika Nikolov, Pavel Kirsten, Robert Petersen, Karen Schilling, David Schott, Christina Gündisch, Sibylle Fend, Falko Becker, Karl-Friedrich Perner, Sven BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The availability of well-annotated prostate tissue samples through biobanks is key for research. Whereas fresh-frozen tissue is well suited for a broad spectrum of molecular analyses, its storage and handling is complex and cost-intensive. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens (FFPE) are easy to handle and economic to store, but their applicability for molecular methods is restricted. The recently introduced Hepes-glutamic acid-buffer mediated Organic solvent Protection Effect (HOPE) is a promising alternative, which might have the potential to unite the benefits of FFPE and fresh-frozen specimen. Aim of the study was to compare HOPE-fixed, FFPE and fresh-frozen bio-specimens for their accessibility for diagnostic and research purposes. METHODS: 10 prostate cancer samples were each preserved with HOPE, formalin, and liquid nitrogen and studied with in-situ and molecular methods. Samples were H&E stained, and assessed by immunohistochemistry (i.e. PSA, GOLPH2, p63) and FISH (i.e. ERG rearrangement). We assessed DNA integrity by PCR, using control genes ranging from 100 to 600 bp amplicon size. RNA integrity was assessed through qRT-PCR on three housekeeping genes (TBP, GAPDH, β-actin). Protein expression was analysed by performing western blot analysis using GOLPH2 and PSA antibodies. RESULTS: Of the HOPE samples, morphologic quality of H&E sections, immunohistochemical staining, and the FISH assay was at least equal to FFPE tissue, and significantly better than the fresh-frozen specimens. DNA, RNA, and protein analysis of HOPE samples provided similar results as compared to fresh-frozen specimens. As expected, FFPE-samples were inferior for most of the molecular analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study, comparatively assessing the suitability of these fixation methods for diagnostic and research utilization. Overall, HOPE-fixed bio-specimens combine the benefits of FFPE- and fresh-frozen samples. Results of this study have the potential to expand on contemporary prostate tissue biobanking approaches and can serve as a model for other organs and tumors. BioMed Central 2011-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3248383/ /pubmed/22151117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-511 Text en Copyright ©2011 Braun et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Braun, Martin
Menon, Roopika
Nikolov, Pavel
Kirsten, Robert
Petersen, Karen
Schilling, David
Schott, Christina
Gündisch, Sibylle
Fend, Falko
Becker, Karl-Friedrich
Perner, Sven
The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches
title The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches
title_full The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches
title_fullStr The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches
title_full_unstemmed The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches
title_short The HOPE fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches
title_sort hope fixation technique - a promising alternative to common prostate cancer biobanking approaches
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22151117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-511
work_keys_str_mv AT braunmartin thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT menonroopika thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT nikolovpavel thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT kirstenrobert thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT petersenkaren thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT schillingdavid thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT schottchristina thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT gundischsibylle thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT fendfalko thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT beckerkarlfriedrich thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT pernersven thehopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT braunmartin hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT menonroopika hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT nikolovpavel hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT kirstenrobert hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT petersenkaren hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT schillingdavid hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT schottchristina hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT gundischsibylle hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT fendfalko hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT beckerkarlfriedrich hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches
AT pernersven hopefixationtechniqueapromisingalternativetocommonprostatecancerbiobankingapproaches