Cargando…
A phase II study evaluating neo-/adjuvant EIA chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The role of chemotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma is controversial. Though many patients undergo initial curative resection, distant metastasis is a frequent event, resulting in 5-year overall survival rates of only 50-60%. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22152120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-510 |
_version_ | 1782220246738796544 |
---|---|
author | Schmitt, Thomas Lehner, Burkhard Kasper, Bernd Bischof, Marc Roeder, Falk Dietrich, Sascha Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia Strauss, Ludwig G Mechtersheimer, Gunhild Wuchter, Patrick Ho, Anthony D Egerer, Gerlinde |
author_facet | Schmitt, Thomas Lehner, Burkhard Kasper, Bernd Bischof, Marc Roeder, Falk Dietrich, Sascha Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia Strauss, Ludwig G Mechtersheimer, Gunhild Wuchter, Patrick Ho, Anthony D Egerer, Gerlinde |
author_sort | Schmitt, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The role of chemotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma is controversial. Though many patients undergo initial curative resection, distant metastasis is a frequent event, resulting in 5-year overall survival rates of only 50-60%. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) has been applied to achieve pre-operative cytoreduction, assess chemosensitivity, and to eliminate occult metastasis. Here we report on the results of our non-randomized phase II study on neo-adjuvant treatment for high-risk STS. METHOD: Patients with potentially curative high-risk STS (size ≥ 5 cm, deep/extracompartimental localization, tumor grades II-III [FNCLCC]) were included. The protocol comprised 4 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (EIA, etoposide 125 mg/m(2 )iv days 1 and 4, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m(2 )iv days 1 - 4, doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2 )day 1, pegfilgrastim 6 mg sc day 5), definitive surgery with intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy and 4 adjuvant cycles of EIA. RESULT: Between 06/2005 and 03/2010 a total of 50 subjects (male = 33, female = 17, median age 50.1 years) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 30.5 months. The majority of primary tumors were located in the extremities or trunk (92%), 6% originated in the abdomen/retroperitoneum. Response by RECIST criteria to neo-adjuvant CTX was 6% CR (n = 3), 24% PR (n = 12), 62% SD (n = 31) and 8% PD (n = 4). Local recurrence occurred in 3 subjects (6%). Distant metastasis was observed in 12 patients (24%). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 2 years was 83% and 68%, respectively. Multivariate analysis failed to prove influence of resection status or grade of histological necrosis on OS or DFS. Severe toxicities included neutropenic fever (4/50), cardiac toxicity (2/50), and CNS toxicity (4/50) leading to CTX dose reductions in 4 subjects. No cases of secondary leukemias were observed so far. CONCLUSION: The current protocol is feasible for achieving local control rates, as well as OS and DFS comparable to previously published data on neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting. However, the definitive role of chemotherapy remains unclear in the absence of large, randomized trials. Therefore, the current regimen can only be recommended within a clinical study, and a possibly increased risk of secondary leukemias has to be taken into account. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01382030, EudraCT 2004-002501-72 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3248452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32484522011-12-30 A phase II study evaluating neo-/adjuvant EIA chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma Schmitt, Thomas Lehner, Burkhard Kasper, Bernd Bischof, Marc Roeder, Falk Dietrich, Sascha Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia Strauss, Ludwig G Mechtersheimer, Gunhild Wuchter, Patrick Ho, Anthony D Egerer, Gerlinde BMC Cancer Research Article ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The role of chemotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma is controversial. Though many patients undergo initial curative resection, distant metastasis is a frequent event, resulting in 5-year overall survival rates of only 50-60%. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) has been applied to achieve pre-operative cytoreduction, assess chemosensitivity, and to eliminate occult metastasis. Here we report on the results of our non-randomized phase II study on neo-adjuvant treatment for high-risk STS. METHOD: Patients with potentially curative high-risk STS (size ≥ 5 cm, deep/extracompartimental localization, tumor grades II-III [FNCLCC]) were included. The protocol comprised 4 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (EIA, etoposide 125 mg/m(2 )iv days 1 and 4, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m(2 )iv days 1 - 4, doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2 )day 1, pegfilgrastim 6 mg sc day 5), definitive surgery with intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy and 4 adjuvant cycles of EIA. RESULT: Between 06/2005 and 03/2010 a total of 50 subjects (male = 33, female = 17, median age 50.1 years) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 30.5 months. The majority of primary tumors were located in the extremities or trunk (92%), 6% originated in the abdomen/retroperitoneum. Response by RECIST criteria to neo-adjuvant CTX was 6% CR (n = 3), 24% PR (n = 12), 62% SD (n = 31) and 8% PD (n = 4). Local recurrence occurred in 3 subjects (6%). Distant metastasis was observed in 12 patients (24%). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 2 years was 83% and 68%, respectively. Multivariate analysis failed to prove influence of resection status or grade of histological necrosis on OS or DFS. Severe toxicities included neutropenic fever (4/50), cardiac toxicity (2/50), and CNS toxicity (4/50) leading to CTX dose reductions in 4 subjects. No cases of secondary leukemias were observed so far. CONCLUSION: The current protocol is feasible for achieving local control rates, as well as OS and DFS comparable to previously published data on neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting. However, the definitive role of chemotherapy remains unclear in the absence of large, randomized trials. Therefore, the current regimen can only be recommended within a clinical study, and a possibly increased risk of secondary leukemias has to be taken into account. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01382030, EudraCT 2004-002501-72 BioMed Central 2011-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3248452/ /pubmed/22152120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-510 Text en Copyright ©2011 Schmitt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schmitt, Thomas Lehner, Burkhard Kasper, Bernd Bischof, Marc Roeder, Falk Dietrich, Sascha Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia Strauss, Ludwig G Mechtersheimer, Gunhild Wuchter, Patrick Ho, Anthony D Egerer, Gerlinde A phase II study evaluating neo-/adjuvant EIA chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma |
title | A phase II study evaluating neo-/adjuvant EIA chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma |
title_full | A phase II study evaluating neo-/adjuvant EIA chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma |
title_fullStr | A phase II study evaluating neo-/adjuvant EIA chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A phase II study evaluating neo-/adjuvant EIA chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma |
title_short | A phase II study evaluating neo-/adjuvant EIA chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma |
title_sort | phase ii study evaluating neo-/adjuvant eia chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22152120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-510 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmittthomas aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT lehnerburkhard aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT kasperbernd aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT bischofmarc aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT roederfalk aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT dietrichsascha aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT dimitrakopouloustraussantonia aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT straussludwigg aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT mechtersheimergunhild aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT wuchterpatrick aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT hoanthonyd aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT egerergerlinde aphaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT schmittthomas phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT lehnerburkhard phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT kasperbernd phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT bischofmarc phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT roederfalk phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT dietrichsascha phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT dimitrakopouloustraussantonia phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT straussludwigg phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT mechtersheimergunhild phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT wuchterpatrick phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT hoanthonyd phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma AT egerergerlinde phaseiistudyevaluatingneoadjuvanteiachemotherapysurgicalresectionandradiotherapyinhighrisksofttissuesarcoma |