Cargando…

A Study to Compare the Radiation Absorbed Dose of the C-arm Fluoroscopic Modes

BACKGROUND: Although many clinicians know about the reducing effects of the pulsed and low-dose modes for fluoroscopic radiation when performing interventional procedures, few studies have quantified the reduction of radiation-absorbed doses (RADs). The aim of this study is to compare how much the R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Jae Hun, Kim, Jae Yun, Kang, Joo Eun, Park, Pyong Eun, Kim, Jae Hun, Lim, Jeong Ae, Kim, Hae Kyoung, Woo, Nam Sik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pain Society 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22220241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2011.24.4.199
_version_ 1782220257278033920
author Cho, Jae Hun
Kim, Jae Yun
Kang, Joo Eun
Park, Pyong Eun
Kim, Jae Hun
Lim, Jeong Ae
Kim, Hae Kyoung
Woo, Nam Sik
author_facet Cho, Jae Hun
Kim, Jae Yun
Kang, Joo Eun
Park, Pyong Eun
Kim, Jae Hun
Lim, Jeong Ae
Kim, Hae Kyoung
Woo, Nam Sik
author_sort Cho, Jae Hun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although many clinicians know about the reducing effects of the pulsed and low-dose modes for fluoroscopic radiation when performing interventional procedures, few studies have quantified the reduction of radiation-absorbed doses (RADs). The aim of this study is to compare how much the RADs from a fluoroscopy are reduced according to the C-arm fluoroscopic modes used. METHODS: We measured the RADs in the C-arm fluoroscopic modes including 'conventional mode', 'pulsed mode', 'low-dose mode', and 'pulsed + low-dose mode'. Clinical imaging conditions were simulated using a lead apron instead of a patient. According to each mode, one experimenter radiographed the lead apron, which was on the table, consecutively 5 times on the AP views. We regarded this as one set and a total of 10 sets were done according to each mode. Cumulative exposure time, RADs, peak X-ray energy, and current, which were viewed on the monitor, were recorded. RESULTS: Pulsed, low-dose, and pulsed + low-dose modes showed significantly decreased RADs by 32%, 57%, and 83% compared to the conventional mode. The mean cumulative exposure time was significantly lower in the pulsed and pulsed + low-dose modes than in the conventional mode. All modes had pretty much the same peak X-ray energy. The mean current was significantly lower in the low-dose and pulsed + low-dose modes than in the conventional mode. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the pulsed and low-dose modes together significantly reduced the RADs compared to the conventional mode. Therefore, the proper use of the fluoroscopy and its C-arm modes will reduce the radiation exposure of patients and clinicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3248583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Korean Pain Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32485832012-01-04 A Study to Compare the Radiation Absorbed Dose of the C-arm Fluoroscopic Modes Cho, Jae Hun Kim, Jae Yun Kang, Joo Eun Park, Pyong Eun Kim, Jae Hun Lim, Jeong Ae Kim, Hae Kyoung Woo, Nam Sik Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: Although many clinicians know about the reducing effects of the pulsed and low-dose modes for fluoroscopic radiation when performing interventional procedures, few studies have quantified the reduction of radiation-absorbed doses (RADs). The aim of this study is to compare how much the RADs from a fluoroscopy are reduced according to the C-arm fluoroscopic modes used. METHODS: We measured the RADs in the C-arm fluoroscopic modes including 'conventional mode', 'pulsed mode', 'low-dose mode', and 'pulsed + low-dose mode'. Clinical imaging conditions were simulated using a lead apron instead of a patient. According to each mode, one experimenter radiographed the lead apron, which was on the table, consecutively 5 times on the AP views. We regarded this as one set and a total of 10 sets were done according to each mode. Cumulative exposure time, RADs, peak X-ray energy, and current, which were viewed on the monitor, were recorded. RESULTS: Pulsed, low-dose, and pulsed + low-dose modes showed significantly decreased RADs by 32%, 57%, and 83% compared to the conventional mode. The mean cumulative exposure time was significantly lower in the pulsed and pulsed + low-dose modes than in the conventional mode. All modes had pretty much the same peak X-ray energy. The mean current was significantly lower in the low-dose and pulsed + low-dose modes than in the conventional mode. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the pulsed and low-dose modes together significantly reduced the RADs compared to the conventional mode. Therefore, the proper use of the fluoroscopy and its C-arm modes will reduce the radiation exposure of patients and clinicians. The Korean Pain Society 2011-12 2011-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3248583/ /pubmed/22220241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2011.24.4.199 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2011 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cho, Jae Hun
Kim, Jae Yun
Kang, Joo Eun
Park, Pyong Eun
Kim, Jae Hun
Lim, Jeong Ae
Kim, Hae Kyoung
Woo, Nam Sik
A Study to Compare the Radiation Absorbed Dose of the C-arm Fluoroscopic Modes
title A Study to Compare the Radiation Absorbed Dose of the C-arm Fluoroscopic Modes
title_full A Study to Compare the Radiation Absorbed Dose of the C-arm Fluoroscopic Modes
title_fullStr A Study to Compare the Radiation Absorbed Dose of the C-arm Fluoroscopic Modes
title_full_unstemmed A Study to Compare the Radiation Absorbed Dose of the C-arm Fluoroscopic Modes
title_short A Study to Compare the Radiation Absorbed Dose of the C-arm Fluoroscopic Modes
title_sort study to compare the radiation absorbed dose of the c-arm fluoroscopic modes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22220241
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2011.24.4.199
work_keys_str_mv AT chojaehun astudytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT kimjaeyun astudytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT kangjooeun astudytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT parkpyongeun astudytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT kimjaehun astudytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT limjeongae astudytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT kimhaekyoung astudytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT woonamsik astudytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT chojaehun studytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT kimjaeyun studytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT kangjooeun studytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT parkpyongeun studytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT kimjaehun studytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT limjeongae studytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT kimhaekyoung studytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes
AT woonamsik studytocomparetheradiationabsorbeddoseofthecarmfluoroscopicmodes