Cargando…

Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE: We sought to ascertain predictors of Patient Prosthesis Mismatch, an independent predictor of mortality, in patients with aortic stenosis using bioprosthetic valves. METHOD: We analyzed 2,107 sequential surgeries. Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was calculated using the effective orifice area...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astudillo, Luis M., Santana, Orlando, Urbandt, Pablo A., Benjo, Alexandre M., Elkayam, Lior U., Nascimento, Francisco O., Lamas, Gervasio A., Lamelas, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22249481
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(01)09
_version_ 1782220261176639488
author Astudillo, Luis M.
Santana, Orlando
Urbandt, Pablo A.
Benjo, Alexandre M.
Elkayam, Lior U.
Nascimento, Francisco O.
Lamas, Gervasio A.
Lamelas, Joseph
author_facet Astudillo, Luis M.
Santana, Orlando
Urbandt, Pablo A.
Benjo, Alexandre M.
Elkayam, Lior U.
Nascimento, Francisco O.
Lamas, Gervasio A.
Lamelas, Joseph
author_sort Astudillo, Luis M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We sought to ascertain predictors of Patient Prosthesis Mismatch, an independent predictor of mortality, in patients with aortic stenosis using bioprosthetic valves. METHOD: We analyzed 2,107 sequential surgeries. Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was calculated using the effective orifice area of the prosthesis divided by the patient's body surface area. We defined nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch as effective orifice area indexes of >0.85 cm(2)/m, 0.85-0.66 cm(2)/m(2), and ≤0.65 cm(2)/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 311 bioprosthetic patients were identified. The incidence of nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was 41%, 42, and 16%, respectively. Severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was significantly more prevalent in females (82%). In severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch, the perfusion and the cross-clamp times were considerably lower when compared with nonsignificant Patient Prosthesis Mismatch and moderate Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. Patients with severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch had a significantly higher likelihood of spending time in the intensive care unit and a significantly longer length of stay in the hospital. Body surface area was not different in severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch when compared with nonsignificant Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. In-hospital mortality in patients with nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was 2.3%, 6.1%, and 8%, respectively. Minimally invasive surgery was significantly associated with moderate Patient Prosthesis Mismatch in 49% of the patients, but not with severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. CONCLUSION: Severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch is more common in females, but not in those with minimal available body surface area. Though operative times were shorter in these patients, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were longer. Surgeons and cardiologists should be cognizant of these clinical predictors and complications prior to valve surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3248602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32486022012-01-04 Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis Astudillo, Luis M. Santana, Orlando Urbandt, Pablo A. Benjo, Alexandre M. Elkayam, Lior U. Nascimento, Francisco O. Lamas, Gervasio A. Lamelas, Joseph Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVE: We sought to ascertain predictors of Patient Prosthesis Mismatch, an independent predictor of mortality, in patients with aortic stenosis using bioprosthetic valves. METHOD: We analyzed 2,107 sequential surgeries. Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was calculated using the effective orifice area of the prosthesis divided by the patient's body surface area. We defined nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch as effective orifice area indexes of >0.85 cm(2)/m, 0.85-0.66 cm(2)/m(2), and ≤0.65 cm(2)/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 311 bioprosthetic patients were identified. The incidence of nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was 41%, 42, and 16%, respectively. Severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was significantly more prevalent in females (82%). In severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch, the perfusion and the cross-clamp times were considerably lower when compared with nonsignificant Patient Prosthesis Mismatch and moderate Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. Patients with severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch had a significantly higher likelihood of spending time in the intensive care unit and a significantly longer length of stay in the hospital. Body surface area was not different in severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch when compared with nonsignificant Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. In-hospital mortality in patients with nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was 2.3%, 6.1%, and 8%, respectively. Minimally invasive surgery was significantly associated with moderate Patient Prosthesis Mismatch in 49% of the patients, but not with severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. CONCLUSION: Severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch is more common in females, but not in those with minimal available body surface area. Though operative times were shorter in these patients, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were longer. Surgeons and cardiologists should be cognizant of these clinical predictors and complications prior to valve surgery. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2012-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3248602/ /pubmed/22249481 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(01)09 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Astudillo, Luis M.
Santana, Orlando
Urbandt, Pablo A.
Benjo, Alexandre M.
Elkayam, Lior U.
Nascimento, Francisco O.
Lamas, Gervasio A.
Lamelas, Joseph
Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
title Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
title_full Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
title_fullStr Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
title_short Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
title_sort clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22249481
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(01)09
work_keys_str_mv AT astudilloluism clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis
AT santanaorlando clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis
AT urbandtpabloa clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis
AT benjoalexandrem clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis
AT elkayamlioru clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis
AT nascimentofranciscoo clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis
AT lamasgervasioa clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis
AT lamelasjoseph clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis