Cargando…
Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis
OBJECTIVE: We sought to ascertain predictors of Patient Prosthesis Mismatch, an independent predictor of mortality, in patients with aortic stenosis using bioprosthetic valves. METHOD: We analyzed 2,107 sequential surgeries. Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was calculated using the effective orifice area...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22249481 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(01)09 |
_version_ | 1782220261176639488 |
---|---|
author | Astudillo, Luis M. Santana, Orlando Urbandt, Pablo A. Benjo, Alexandre M. Elkayam, Lior U. Nascimento, Francisco O. Lamas, Gervasio A. Lamelas, Joseph |
author_facet | Astudillo, Luis M. Santana, Orlando Urbandt, Pablo A. Benjo, Alexandre M. Elkayam, Lior U. Nascimento, Francisco O. Lamas, Gervasio A. Lamelas, Joseph |
author_sort | Astudillo, Luis M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We sought to ascertain predictors of Patient Prosthesis Mismatch, an independent predictor of mortality, in patients with aortic stenosis using bioprosthetic valves. METHOD: We analyzed 2,107 sequential surgeries. Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was calculated using the effective orifice area of the prosthesis divided by the patient's body surface area. We defined nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch as effective orifice area indexes of >0.85 cm(2)/m, 0.85-0.66 cm(2)/m(2), and ≤0.65 cm(2)/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 311 bioprosthetic patients were identified. The incidence of nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was 41%, 42, and 16%, respectively. Severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was significantly more prevalent in females (82%). In severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch, the perfusion and the cross-clamp times were considerably lower when compared with nonsignificant Patient Prosthesis Mismatch and moderate Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. Patients with severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch had a significantly higher likelihood of spending time in the intensive care unit and a significantly longer length of stay in the hospital. Body surface area was not different in severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch when compared with nonsignificant Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. In-hospital mortality in patients with nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was 2.3%, 6.1%, and 8%, respectively. Minimally invasive surgery was significantly associated with moderate Patient Prosthesis Mismatch in 49% of the patients, but not with severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. CONCLUSION: Severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch is more common in females, but not in those with minimal available body surface area. Though operative times were shorter in these patients, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were longer. Surgeons and cardiologists should be cognizant of these clinical predictors and complications prior to valve surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3248602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32486022012-01-04 Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis Astudillo, Luis M. Santana, Orlando Urbandt, Pablo A. Benjo, Alexandre M. Elkayam, Lior U. Nascimento, Francisco O. Lamas, Gervasio A. Lamelas, Joseph Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVE: We sought to ascertain predictors of Patient Prosthesis Mismatch, an independent predictor of mortality, in patients with aortic stenosis using bioprosthetic valves. METHOD: We analyzed 2,107 sequential surgeries. Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was calculated using the effective orifice area of the prosthesis divided by the patient's body surface area. We defined nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch as effective orifice area indexes of >0.85 cm(2)/m, 0.85-0.66 cm(2)/m(2), and ≤0.65 cm(2)/m(2), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 311 bioprosthetic patients were identified. The incidence of nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was 41%, 42, and 16%, respectively. Severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was significantly more prevalent in females (82%). In severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch, the perfusion and the cross-clamp times were considerably lower when compared with nonsignificant Patient Prosthesis Mismatch and moderate Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. Patients with severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch had a significantly higher likelihood of spending time in the intensive care unit and a significantly longer length of stay in the hospital. Body surface area was not different in severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch when compared with nonsignificant Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. In-hospital mortality in patients with nonsignificant, moderate, and severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch was 2.3%, 6.1%, and 8%, respectively. Minimally invasive surgery was significantly associated with moderate Patient Prosthesis Mismatch in 49% of the patients, but not with severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch. CONCLUSION: Severe Patient Prosthesis Mismatch is more common in females, but not in those with minimal available body surface area. Though operative times were shorter in these patients, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were longer. Surgeons and cardiologists should be cognizant of these clinical predictors and complications prior to valve surgery. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2012-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3248602/ /pubmed/22249481 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(01)09 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Astudillo, Luis M. Santana, Orlando Urbandt, Pablo A. Benjo, Alexandre M. Elkayam, Lior U. Nascimento, Francisco O. Lamas, Gervasio A. Lamelas, Joseph Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis |
title | Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis |
title_full | Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis |
title_fullStr | Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis |
title_short | Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis |
title_sort | clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22249481 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(01)09 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT astudilloluism clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis AT santanaorlando clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis AT urbandtpabloa clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis AT benjoalexandrem clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis AT elkayamlioru clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis AT nascimentofranciscoo clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis AT lamasgervasioa clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis AT lamelasjoseph clinicalpredictorsofprosthesispatientmismatchafteraorticvalvereplacementforaorticstenosis |