Cargando…
Lasting Controversy on Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an important angiogenic factor that is able to stimulate the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells, is the best-studied hallmark of angiogenesis. Neovascularization is a major cause of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) which is a leading cau...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22211145 |
_version_ | 1782220264590802944 |
---|---|
author | Zou, Lihui Lai, Huiying Zhou, Qi Xiao, Fei |
author_facet | Zou, Lihui Lai, Huiying Zhou, Qi Xiao, Fei |
author_sort | Zou, Lihui |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an important angiogenic factor that is able to stimulate the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells, is the best-studied hallmark of angiogenesis. Neovascularization is a major cause of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) which is a leading cause of blindness in the elderly population. Specific molecular inhibitors of VEGF have been proved to be useful in the treatment of AMD. Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab are structurally similar to anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of AMD. Many studies have indicated that Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab are of roughly equal short-term efficacy and safety, Bevacizumab is an attractive alternative to Ranibizumab due to its lower cost. However, only Ranibizumab has received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of macular degeneration. More multicenter clinical trials are required to compare the relative efficacy and safety of these two drugs and some progress has been achieved. This review discusses the clinical effectiveness, safety, cost and other practical implications of Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3248643 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32486432011-12-30 Lasting Controversy on Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab Zou, Lihui Lai, Huiying Zhou, Qi Xiao, Fei Theranostics Review Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an important angiogenic factor that is able to stimulate the proliferation and migration of endothelial cells, is the best-studied hallmark of angiogenesis. Neovascularization is a major cause of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) which is a leading cause of blindness in the elderly population. Specific molecular inhibitors of VEGF have been proved to be useful in the treatment of AMD. Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab are structurally similar to anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of AMD. Many studies have indicated that Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab are of roughly equal short-term efficacy and safety, Bevacizumab is an attractive alternative to Ranibizumab due to its lower cost. However, only Ranibizumab has received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the treatment of macular degeneration. More multicenter clinical trials are required to compare the relative efficacy and safety of these two drugs and some progress has been achieved. This review discusses the clinical effectiveness, safety, cost and other practical implications of Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab. Ivyspring International Publisher 2011-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3248643/ /pubmed/22211145 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Zou, Lihui Lai, Huiying Zhou, Qi Xiao, Fei Lasting Controversy on Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab |
title | Lasting Controversy on Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab |
title_full | Lasting Controversy on Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab |
title_fullStr | Lasting Controversy on Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab |
title_full_unstemmed | Lasting Controversy on Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab |
title_short | Lasting Controversy on Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab |
title_sort | lasting controversy on ranibizumab and bevacizumab |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248643/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22211145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zoulihui lastingcontroversyonranibizumabandbevacizumab AT laihuiying lastingcontroversyonranibizumabandbevacizumab AT zhouqi lastingcontroversyonranibizumabandbevacizumab AT xiaofei lastingcontroversyonranibizumabandbevacizumab |