Cargando…

The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression

BACKGROUND: Although numerous efficacy studies in recent years have found internet-based interventions for depression to be effective, there has been scant consideration of therapeutic process factors in the online setting. In face-to face therapy, the quality of the working alliance explains varian...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Preschl, Barbara, Maercker, Andreas, Wagner, Birgit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22145768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-189
_version_ 1782220277105557504
author Preschl, Barbara
Maercker, Andreas
Wagner, Birgit
author_facet Preschl, Barbara
Maercker, Andreas
Wagner, Birgit
author_sort Preschl, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although numerous efficacy studies in recent years have found internet-based interventions for depression to be effective, there has been scant consideration of therapeutic process factors in the online setting. In face-to face therapy, the quality of the working alliance explains variance in treatment outcome. However, little is yet known about the impact of the working alliance in internet-based interventions, particularly as compared with face-to-face therapy. METHODS: This study explored the working alliance between client and therapist in the middle and at the end of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for depression. The participants were randomized to an internet-based treatment group (n = 25) or face-to-face group (n = 28). Both groups received the same cognitive behavioral therapy over an 8-week timeframe. Participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) post-treatment and the Working Alliance Inventory at mid- and post- treatment. Therapists completed the therapist version of the Working Alliance Inventory at post-treatment. RESULTS: With the exception of therapists' ratings of the tasks subscale, which were significantly higher in the online group, the two groups' ratings of the working alliance did not differ significantly. Further, significant correlations were found between clients' ratings of the working alliance and therapy outcome at post-treatment in the online group and at both mid- and post-treatment in the face-to-face group. Correlation analysis revealed that the working alliance ratings did not significantly predict the BDI residual gain score in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to what might have been expected, the working alliance in the online group was comparable to that in the face-to-face group. However, the results showed no significant relations between the BDI residual gain score and the working alliance ratings in either group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12611000563965
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3248847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32488472011-12-31 The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression Preschl, Barbara Maercker, Andreas Wagner, Birgit BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Although numerous efficacy studies in recent years have found internet-based interventions for depression to be effective, there has been scant consideration of therapeutic process factors in the online setting. In face-to face therapy, the quality of the working alliance explains variance in treatment outcome. However, little is yet known about the impact of the working alliance in internet-based interventions, particularly as compared with face-to-face therapy. METHODS: This study explored the working alliance between client and therapist in the middle and at the end of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for depression. The participants were randomized to an internet-based treatment group (n = 25) or face-to-face group (n = 28). Both groups received the same cognitive behavioral therapy over an 8-week timeframe. Participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) post-treatment and the Working Alliance Inventory at mid- and post- treatment. Therapists completed the therapist version of the Working Alliance Inventory at post-treatment. RESULTS: With the exception of therapists' ratings of the tasks subscale, which were significantly higher in the online group, the two groups' ratings of the working alliance did not differ significantly. Further, significant correlations were found between clients' ratings of the working alliance and therapy outcome at post-treatment in the online group and at both mid- and post-treatment in the face-to-face group. Correlation analysis revealed that the working alliance ratings did not significantly predict the BDI residual gain score in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to what might have been expected, the working alliance in the online group was comparable to that in the face-to-face group. However, the results showed no significant relations between the BDI residual gain score and the working alliance ratings in either group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12611000563965 BioMed Central 2011-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3248847/ /pubmed/22145768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-189 Text en Copyright ©2011 Preschl et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Preschl, Barbara
Maercker, Andreas
Wagner, Birgit
The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
title The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
title_full The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
title_fullStr The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
title_full_unstemmed The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
title_short The working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
title_sort working alliance in a randomized controlled trial comparing online with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3248847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22145768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-189
work_keys_str_mv AT preschlbarbara theworkingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression
AT maerckerandreas theworkingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression
AT wagnerbirgit theworkingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression
AT preschlbarbara workingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression
AT maerckerandreas workingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression
AT wagnerbirgit workingallianceinarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingonlinewithfacetofacecognitivebehavioraltherapyfordepression