Cargando…

Divergence and Convergence in Enzyme Evolution

Comparative analysis of the sequences of enzymes encoded in a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes reveals convergence and divergence at several levels. Functional convergence can be inferred when structurally distinct and hence non-homologous enzymes show the ability to catalyze the same b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galperin, Michael Y., Koonin, Eugene V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22069324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R111.241976
_version_ 1782220296444444672
author Galperin, Michael Y.
Koonin, Eugene V.
author_facet Galperin, Michael Y.
Koonin, Eugene V.
author_sort Galperin, Michael Y.
collection PubMed
description Comparative analysis of the sequences of enzymes encoded in a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes reveals convergence and divergence at several levels. Functional convergence can be inferred when structurally distinct and hence non-homologous enzymes show the ability to catalyze the same biochemical reaction. In contrast, as a result of functional diversification, many structurally similar enzyme molecules act on substantially distinct substrates and catalyze diverse biochemical reactions. Here, we present updates on the ATP-grasp, alkaline phosphatase, cupin, HD hydrolase, and N-terminal nucleophile (Ntn) hydrolase enzyme superfamilies and discuss the patterns of sequence and structural conservation and diversity within these superfamilies. Typically, enzymes within a superfamily possess common sequence motifs and key active site residues, as well as (predicted) reaction mechanisms. These observations suggest that the strained conformation (the entatic state) of the active site, which is responsible for the substrate binding and formation of the transition complex, tends to be conserved within enzyme superfamilies. The subsequent fate of the transition complex is not necessarily conserved and depends on the details of the structures of the enzyme and the substrate. This variability of reaction outcomes limits the ability of sequence analysis to predict the exact enzymatic activities of newly sequenced gene products. Nevertheless, sequence-based (super)family assignments and generic functional predictions, even if imprecise, provide valuable leads for experimental studies and remain the best approach to the functional annotation of uncharacterized proteins from new genomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3249071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32490712012-01-04 Divergence and Convergence in Enzyme Evolution Galperin, Michael Y. Koonin, Eugene V. J Biol Chem Minireviews Comparative analysis of the sequences of enzymes encoded in a variety of prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes reveals convergence and divergence at several levels. Functional convergence can be inferred when structurally distinct and hence non-homologous enzymes show the ability to catalyze the same biochemical reaction. In contrast, as a result of functional diversification, many structurally similar enzyme molecules act on substantially distinct substrates and catalyze diverse biochemical reactions. Here, we present updates on the ATP-grasp, alkaline phosphatase, cupin, HD hydrolase, and N-terminal nucleophile (Ntn) hydrolase enzyme superfamilies and discuss the patterns of sequence and structural conservation and diversity within these superfamilies. Typically, enzymes within a superfamily possess common sequence motifs and key active site residues, as well as (predicted) reaction mechanisms. These observations suggest that the strained conformation (the entatic state) of the active site, which is responsible for the substrate binding and formation of the transition complex, tends to be conserved within enzyme superfamilies. The subsequent fate of the transition complex is not necessarily conserved and depends on the details of the structures of the enzyme and the substrate. This variability of reaction outcomes limits the ability of sequence analysis to predict the exact enzymatic activities of newly sequenced gene products. Nevertheless, sequence-based (super)family assignments and generic functional predictions, even if imprecise, provide valuable leads for experimental studies and remain the best approach to the functional annotation of uncharacterized proteins from new genomes. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2012-01-02 2011-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3249071/ /pubmed/22069324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R111.241976 Text en © 2012 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Author's Choice—Final version full access. Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) applies to Author Choice Articles
spellingShingle Minireviews
Galperin, Michael Y.
Koonin, Eugene V.
Divergence and Convergence in Enzyme Evolution
title Divergence and Convergence in Enzyme Evolution
title_full Divergence and Convergence in Enzyme Evolution
title_fullStr Divergence and Convergence in Enzyme Evolution
title_full_unstemmed Divergence and Convergence in Enzyme Evolution
title_short Divergence and Convergence in Enzyme Evolution
title_sort divergence and convergence in enzyme evolution
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22069324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R111.241976
work_keys_str_mv AT galperinmichaely divergenceandconvergenceinenzymeevolution
AT koonineugenev divergenceandconvergenceinenzymeevolution