Cargando…
Use of transtibial aimer via the accessory anteromedial portal to identify the center of the ACL footprint
PURPOSE: To assess the ability of a transtibial aimer with a 7-mm off-set in a standardized position to reach the center of the ACL footprint on the femur through the AM portal. METHODS: Nineteen cadaveric knees were dissected, and the perimeter of the femoral ACL footprint was marked. The aimer was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21695468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1574-1 |
_version_ | 1782220299421351936 |
---|---|
author | Celentano, Umberto Cardoso, Marcos P. A. Martins, Cesar A. Q. Ramirez, Claudia P. van Eck, Carola F. Smolinski, Patrick Fu, Freddie H. |
author_facet | Celentano, Umberto Cardoso, Marcos P. A. Martins, Cesar A. Q. Ramirez, Claudia P. van Eck, Carola F. Smolinski, Patrick Fu, Freddie H. |
author_sort | Celentano, Umberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the ability of a transtibial aimer with a 7-mm off-set in a standardized position to reach the center of the ACL footprint on the femur through the AM portal. METHODS: Nineteen cadaveric knees were dissected, and the perimeter of the femoral ACL footprint was marked. The aimer was placed just superior to the medial joint line close to the medial condyle through the AM portal. The guide was rested upon the posterior cortex and placed in three different positions: (A) at zero degrees in frontal plane and 60° in axial plane, (B) at 45° in frontal and 45° in axial, and (C) at the center of the ACL insertion site under direct visualization. A digital camera was used to take pictures on the axial plane, and Image J software was used for angle measurement. Aluminum beads were used to mark the three positions indicated by the aimer, and CT scans were performed. The distances from the true center of the ACL to each point were determined. RESULTS: Position A resulted in femoral tunnel placement furthest from the center of the ACL footprint (8.6 mm). Position B was at a distance of 3.2 mm, and position C was the most accurate, with an average distance of 2.0 mm. The angles required by Position C varied with an average of 54° ± 11° in the frontal plane and an average of 44° ± 6° in the axial plane. CONCLUSION: The 7-mm transtibial aimer was unable to reach the center of ACL footprint at a fixed orientation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3249156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32491562012-01-11 Use of transtibial aimer via the accessory anteromedial portal to identify the center of the ACL footprint Celentano, Umberto Cardoso, Marcos P. A. Martins, Cesar A. Q. Ramirez, Claudia P. van Eck, Carola F. Smolinski, Patrick Fu, Freddie H. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Knee PURPOSE: To assess the ability of a transtibial aimer with a 7-mm off-set in a standardized position to reach the center of the ACL footprint on the femur through the AM portal. METHODS: Nineteen cadaveric knees were dissected, and the perimeter of the femoral ACL footprint was marked. The aimer was placed just superior to the medial joint line close to the medial condyle through the AM portal. The guide was rested upon the posterior cortex and placed in three different positions: (A) at zero degrees in frontal plane and 60° in axial plane, (B) at 45° in frontal and 45° in axial, and (C) at the center of the ACL insertion site under direct visualization. A digital camera was used to take pictures on the axial plane, and Image J software was used for angle measurement. Aluminum beads were used to mark the three positions indicated by the aimer, and CT scans were performed. The distances from the true center of the ACL to each point were determined. RESULTS: Position A resulted in femoral tunnel placement furthest from the center of the ACL footprint (8.6 mm). Position B was at a distance of 3.2 mm, and position C was the most accurate, with an average distance of 2.0 mm. The angles required by Position C varied with an average of 54° ± 11° in the frontal plane and an average of 44° ± 6° in the axial plane. CONCLUSION: The 7-mm transtibial aimer was unable to reach the center of ACL footprint at a fixed orientation. Springer-Verlag 2011-06-22 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3249156/ /pubmed/21695468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1574-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Knee Celentano, Umberto Cardoso, Marcos P. A. Martins, Cesar A. Q. Ramirez, Claudia P. van Eck, Carola F. Smolinski, Patrick Fu, Freddie H. Use of transtibial aimer via the accessory anteromedial portal to identify the center of the ACL footprint |
title | Use of transtibial aimer via the accessory anteromedial portal to identify the center of the ACL footprint |
title_full | Use of transtibial aimer via the accessory anteromedial portal to identify the center of the ACL footprint |
title_fullStr | Use of transtibial aimer via the accessory anteromedial portal to identify the center of the ACL footprint |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of transtibial aimer via the accessory anteromedial portal to identify the center of the ACL footprint |
title_short | Use of transtibial aimer via the accessory anteromedial portal to identify the center of the ACL footprint |
title_sort | use of transtibial aimer via the accessory anteromedial portal to identify the center of the acl footprint |
topic | Knee |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21695468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1574-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT celentanoumberto useoftranstibialaimerviatheaccessoryanteromedialportaltoidentifythecenteroftheaclfootprint AT cardosomarcospa useoftranstibialaimerviatheaccessoryanteromedialportaltoidentifythecenteroftheaclfootprint AT martinscesaraq useoftranstibialaimerviatheaccessoryanteromedialportaltoidentifythecenteroftheaclfootprint AT ramirezclaudiap useoftranstibialaimerviatheaccessoryanteromedialportaltoidentifythecenteroftheaclfootprint AT vaneckcarolaf useoftranstibialaimerviatheaccessoryanteromedialportaltoidentifythecenteroftheaclfootprint AT smolinskipatrick useoftranstibialaimerviatheaccessoryanteromedialportaltoidentifythecenteroftheaclfootprint AT fufreddieh useoftranstibialaimerviatheaccessoryanteromedialportaltoidentifythecenteroftheaclfootprint |