Cargando…

Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?

AIMS: The current guidelines recommend reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with ST-segment elevation or left bundle branch block (LBBB). Surprisingly, the right bundle branch block (RBBB) is not listed as an indication for reperfusion therapy. This study analysed patients with A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Widimsky, Petr, Roháč, Filip, Štásek, Josef, Kala, Petr, Rokyta, Richard, Kuzmanov, Boyko, Jakl, Martin, Poloczek, Martin, Kaňovský, Jan, Bernat, Ivo, Hlinomaz, Ota, Bělohlávek, Jan, Král, Ales, Mrázek, Vratislav, Grigorov, Vladimir, Djambazov, Slaveyko, Petr, Robert, Knot, Jiri, Bílková, Dana, Fischerová, Michaela, Vondrák, Karel, Malý, Marek, Lorencová, Alena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21890488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr291
_version_ 1782220313677791232
author Widimsky, Petr
Roháč, Filip
Štásek, Josef
Kala, Petr
Rokyta, Richard
Kuzmanov, Boyko
Jakl, Martin
Poloczek, Martin
Kaňovský, Jan
Bernat, Ivo
Hlinomaz, Ota
Bělohlávek, Jan
Král, Ales
Mrázek, Vratislav
Grigorov, Vladimir
Djambazov, Slaveyko
Petr, Robert
Knot, Jiri
Bílková, Dana
Fischerová, Michaela
Vondrák, Karel
Malý, Marek
Lorencová, Alena
author_facet Widimsky, Petr
Roháč, Filip
Štásek, Josef
Kala, Petr
Rokyta, Richard
Kuzmanov, Boyko
Jakl, Martin
Poloczek, Martin
Kaňovský, Jan
Bernat, Ivo
Hlinomaz, Ota
Bělohlávek, Jan
Král, Ales
Mrázek, Vratislav
Grigorov, Vladimir
Djambazov, Slaveyko
Petr, Robert
Knot, Jiri
Bílková, Dana
Fischerová, Michaela
Vondrák, Karel
Malý, Marek
Lorencová, Alena
author_sort Widimsky, Petr
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The current guidelines recommend reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with ST-segment elevation or left bundle branch block (LBBB). Surprisingly, the right bundle branch block (RBBB) is not listed as an indication for reperfusion therapy. This study analysed patients with AMI presenting with RBBB [with or without left anterior hemiblock (LAH) or left posterior hemiblock (LPH)] and compared them with those presenting with LBBB or with other electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns. The aim was to describe angiographic patterns and primary angioplasty use in AMI patients with RBBB. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 6742 patients with AMI admitted to eight participating hospitals was analysed. Baseline clinical characteristics, ECG patterns, coronary angiographic, and echocardiographic data were correlated with the reperfusion therapies used and with in-hospital outcomes. Right bundle branch block was present in 6.3% of AMI patients: 2.8% had RBBB alone, 3.2% had RBBB + LAH, and 0.3% had RBBB + LPH. TIMI flow 0 in the infarct-related artery was present in 51.7% of RBBB patients vs. 39.4% of LBBB patients (P = 0.023). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 80.1% of RBBB patients vs. 68.3% of LBBB patients (P< 0.001). In-hospital mortality of RBBB patients was similar to LBBB (14.3 vs. 13.1%, P = 0.661). Patients with new or presumably new blocks had the highest (LBBB 15.8% and RBBB 15.4%) incidence of cardiogenic shock from all ECG subgroups. Percutaneous coronary intervention was done more frequently (84.8%) in patients with new or presumably new RBBB when compared with other patients with blocks (old RBBB 66.0%, old LBBB 62.3%, new or presumably new LBBB 73.0%). In-hospital mortality was highest (18.8%) among patients presenting with new or presumably new RBBB, followed by new or presumably new LBBB (13.2%), old LBBB (10.1%), and old RBBB (6.4%). Among 35 patients with acute left main coronary artery occlusion, 26% presented with RBBB (mostly with LAH) on the admission ECG. CONCLUSION: Acute myocardial infarction with RBBB is frequently caused by the complete occlusion of the infarct-related artery and is more frequently treated with primary PCI when compared with AMI + LBBB. In-hospital mortality of patients with AMI and RBBB is highest from all ECG presentations of AMI. Restoration of coronary flow by primary PCI may lead to resolution of the conduction delay on the discharge ECG. Right bundle branch block should strongly be considered for listing in future guidelines as a standard indication for reperfusion therapy, in the same way as LBBB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3249219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32492192012-01-03 Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy? Widimsky, Petr Roháč, Filip Štásek, Josef Kala, Petr Rokyta, Richard Kuzmanov, Boyko Jakl, Martin Poloczek, Martin Kaňovský, Jan Bernat, Ivo Hlinomaz, Ota Bělohlávek, Jan Král, Ales Mrázek, Vratislav Grigorov, Vladimir Djambazov, Slaveyko Petr, Robert Knot, Jiri Bílková, Dana Fischerová, Michaela Vondrák, Karel Malý, Marek Lorencová, Alena Eur Heart J Clinical Research AIMS: The current guidelines recommend reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with ST-segment elevation or left bundle branch block (LBBB). Surprisingly, the right bundle branch block (RBBB) is not listed as an indication for reperfusion therapy. This study analysed patients with AMI presenting with RBBB [with or without left anterior hemiblock (LAH) or left posterior hemiblock (LPH)] and compared them with those presenting with LBBB or with other electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns. The aim was to describe angiographic patterns and primary angioplasty use in AMI patients with RBBB. METHODS AND RESULTS: A cohort of 6742 patients with AMI admitted to eight participating hospitals was analysed. Baseline clinical characteristics, ECG patterns, coronary angiographic, and echocardiographic data were correlated with the reperfusion therapies used and with in-hospital outcomes. Right bundle branch block was present in 6.3% of AMI patients: 2.8% had RBBB alone, 3.2% had RBBB + LAH, and 0.3% had RBBB + LPH. TIMI flow 0 in the infarct-related artery was present in 51.7% of RBBB patients vs. 39.4% of LBBB patients (P = 0.023). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 80.1% of RBBB patients vs. 68.3% of LBBB patients (P< 0.001). In-hospital mortality of RBBB patients was similar to LBBB (14.3 vs. 13.1%, P = 0.661). Patients with new or presumably new blocks had the highest (LBBB 15.8% and RBBB 15.4%) incidence of cardiogenic shock from all ECG subgroups. Percutaneous coronary intervention was done more frequently (84.8%) in patients with new or presumably new RBBB when compared with other patients with blocks (old RBBB 66.0%, old LBBB 62.3%, new or presumably new LBBB 73.0%). In-hospital mortality was highest (18.8%) among patients presenting with new or presumably new RBBB, followed by new or presumably new LBBB (13.2%), old LBBB (10.1%), and old RBBB (6.4%). Among 35 patients with acute left main coronary artery occlusion, 26% presented with RBBB (mostly with LAH) on the admission ECG. CONCLUSION: Acute myocardial infarction with RBBB is frequently caused by the complete occlusion of the infarct-related artery and is more frequently treated with primary PCI when compared with AMI + LBBB. In-hospital mortality of patients with AMI and RBBB is highest from all ECG presentations of AMI. Restoration of coronary flow by primary PCI may lead to resolution of the conduction delay on the discharge ECG. Right bundle branch block should strongly be considered for listing in future guidelines as a standard indication for reperfusion therapy, in the same way as LBBB. Oxford University Press 2012-01 2011-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3249219/ /pubmed/21890488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr291 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2011. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/ The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Widimsky, Petr
Roháč, Filip
Štásek, Josef
Kala, Petr
Rokyta, Richard
Kuzmanov, Boyko
Jakl, Martin
Poloczek, Martin
Kaňovský, Jan
Bernat, Ivo
Hlinomaz, Ota
Bělohlávek, Jan
Král, Ales
Mrázek, Vratislav
Grigorov, Vladimir
Djambazov, Slaveyko
Petr, Robert
Knot, Jiri
Bílková, Dana
Fischerová, Michaela
Vondrák, Karel
Malý, Marek
Lorencová, Alena
Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?
title Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?
title_full Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?
title_fullStr Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?
title_full_unstemmed Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?
title_short Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?
title_sort primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21890488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr291
work_keys_str_mv AT widimskypetr primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT rohacfilip primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT stasekjosef primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT kalapetr primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT rokytarichard primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT kuzmanovboyko primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT jaklmartin primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT poloczekmartin primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT kanovskyjan primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT bernativo primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT hlinomazota primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT belohlavekjan primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT kralales primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT mrazekvratislav primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT grigorovvladimir primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT djambazovslaveyko primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT petrrobert primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT knotjiri primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT bilkovadana primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT fischerovamichaela primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT vondrakkarel primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT malymarek primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy
AT lorencovaalena primaryangioplastyinacutemyocardialinfarctionwithrightbundlebranchblockshouldnewonsetrightbundlebranchblockbeaddedtofutureguidelinesasanindicationforreperfusiontherapy