Cargando…

Agreement of Two Different Laboratory Methods Used to Measure Electrolytes

AIM: The aim of our study was to do an agreement analysis of two different laboratory methods used to measure electrolytes i.e., between the ISE based Beckman Coulter Synchron CX9 PRO Biochemistry analyzer and RAL's Ion3 Flame Photometer (Técnica para el Laboratorio, Barcelona, Spain), in serum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albert, Venencia, Subramanian, Arulselvi, Rangarajan, Kanchana, Pandey, Ravindra Mohan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22219564
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.86843
_version_ 1782220368280289280
author Albert, Venencia
Subramanian, Arulselvi
Rangarajan, Kanchana
Pandey, Ravindra Mohan
author_facet Albert, Venencia
Subramanian, Arulselvi
Rangarajan, Kanchana
Pandey, Ravindra Mohan
author_sort Albert, Venencia
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of our study was to do an agreement analysis of two different laboratory methods used to measure electrolytes i.e., between the ISE based Beckman Coulter Synchron CX9 PRO Biochemistry analyzer and RAL's Ion3 Flame Photometer (Técnica para el Laboratorio, Barcelona, Spain), in serum samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross sectional study was done over a period of three months from September’09 through December’09 on routine biochemistry samples. A total of 6492 samples were received for routine biochemistry analysis from those 630 blood samples were randomly processed for this study. Two ml of sample was taken in a plain gel tube (LABTECH Disposables, Ahmedabad, India), centrifuged and further processed using both systems within one hour of the sampling to obtain the Na and K concentrations in the samples. The bias and variability of differences in measured values were analyzed according to Bland and Altman method. RESULTS: Flame photometry method has drawbacks such as low throughput, requires manual operation, is a time consuming procedure. Ion selective electrodes technique is a more universal method for the high throughput determination of electrolytes in physiological samples; Beckman Coulter Synchron CX9 PRO is an example of such a system. The mean difference between the two methods (standard minus test) and 95% limits of agreement for sodium in serum was -7.8±17.3 (-42.2 to 26.6) and in urine was -22±41 (-104 to 60). Similarly, the mean difference between the two methods for potassium values in serum was found to be -0.25±0.75 (-1.75 to 1.25) and in urine was -5.3±38.9 (-83.1 to 72.5). With 95% confidence interval, the value of sodium and potassium as determined by both the methods lie between the upper and lower limit showing 95% limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: Good degree of agreement was seen on comparing the two methods for measuring the electrolytes; the use of Synchron CX9 in place of Flame photometer for electrolyte analysis in serum and urine is justified or use the two interchangeably.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3249705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32497052012-01-04 Agreement of Two Different Laboratory Methods Used to Measure Electrolytes Albert, Venencia Subramanian, Arulselvi Rangarajan, Kanchana Pandey, Ravindra Mohan J Lab Physicians Original Article AIM: The aim of our study was to do an agreement analysis of two different laboratory methods used to measure electrolytes i.e., between the ISE based Beckman Coulter Synchron CX9 PRO Biochemistry analyzer and RAL's Ion3 Flame Photometer (Técnica para el Laboratorio, Barcelona, Spain), in serum samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross sectional study was done over a period of three months from September’09 through December’09 on routine biochemistry samples. A total of 6492 samples were received for routine biochemistry analysis from those 630 blood samples were randomly processed for this study. Two ml of sample was taken in a plain gel tube (LABTECH Disposables, Ahmedabad, India), centrifuged and further processed using both systems within one hour of the sampling to obtain the Na and K concentrations in the samples. The bias and variability of differences in measured values were analyzed according to Bland and Altman method. RESULTS: Flame photometry method has drawbacks such as low throughput, requires manual operation, is a time consuming procedure. Ion selective electrodes technique is a more universal method for the high throughput determination of electrolytes in physiological samples; Beckman Coulter Synchron CX9 PRO is an example of such a system. The mean difference between the two methods (standard minus test) and 95% limits of agreement for sodium in serum was -7.8±17.3 (-42.2 to 26.6) and in urine was -22±41 (-104 to 60). Similarly, the mean difference between the two methods for potassium values in serum was found to be -0.25±0.75 (-1.75 to 1.25) and in urine was -5.3±38.9 (-83.1 to 72.5). With 95% confidence interval, the value of sodium and potassium as determined by both the methods lie between the upper and lower limit showing 95% limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: Good degree of agreement was seen on comparing the two methods for measuring the electrolytes; the use of Synchron CX9 in place of Flame photometer for electrolyte analysis in serum and urine is justified or use the two interchangeably. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3249705/ /pubmed/22219564 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.86843 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Laboratory Physicians http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Albert, Venencia
Subramanian, Arulselvi
Rangarajan, Kanchana
Pandey, Ravindra Mohan
Agreement of Two Different Laboratory Methods Used to Measure Electrolytes
title Agreement of Two Different Laboratory Methods Used to Measure Electrolytes
title_full Agreement of Two Different Laboratory Methods Used to Measure Electrolytes
title_fullStr Agreement of Two Different Laboratory Methods Used to Measure Electrolytes
title_full_unstemmed Agreement of Two Different Laboratory Methods Used to Measure Electrolytes
title_short Agreement of Two Different Laboratory Methods Used to Measure Electrolytes
title_sort agreement of two different laboratory methods used to measure electrolytes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22219564
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.86843
work_keys_str_mv AT albertvenencia agreementoftwodifferentlaboratorymethodsusedtomeasureelectrolytes
AT subramanianarulselvi agreementoftwodifferentlaboratorymethodsusedtomeasureelectrolytes
AT rangarajankanchana agreementoftwodifferentlaboratorymethodsusedtomeasureelectrolytes
AT pandeyravindramohan agreementoftwodifferentlaboratorymethodsusedtomeasureelectrolytes