Cargando…
Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography: Commissioning and evaluation of patient dose
The improvement in conformal radiotherapy techniques enables us to achieve steep dose gradients around the target which allows the delivery of higher doses to a tumor volume while maintaining the sparing of surrounding normal tissue. One of the reasons for this improvement was the implementation of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22228929 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.89969 |
_version_ | 1782220374048505856 |
---|---|
author | Abou-elenein, Hassan S. Attalla, Ehab M. Ammar, H. Eldesoky, Ismail Farouk, Mohamed Zaghloul, Mohamed S. |
author_facet | Abou-elenein, Hassan S. Attalla, Ehab M. Ammar, H. Eldesoky, Ismail Farouk, Mohamed Zaghloul, Mohamed S. |
author_sort | Abou-elenein, Hassan S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The improvement in conformal radiotherapy techniques enables us to achieve steep dose gradients around the target which allows the delivery of higher doses to a tumor volume while maintaining the sparing of surrounding normal tissue. One of the reasons for this improvement was the implementation of intensity-modulated radio therapy (IMRT) by using linear accelerators fitted with multi-leaf collimator (MLC), Tomo therapy and Rapid arc. In this situation, verification of patient set-up and evaluation of internal organ motion just prior to radiation delivery become important. To this end, several volumetric image-guided techniques have been developed for patient localization, such as Siemens OPTIVUE/MVCB and MVision megavoltage cone beam CT (MV-CBCT) system. Quality assurance for MV-CBCT is important to insure that the performance of the Electronic portal image device (EPID) and MV-CBCT is suitable for the required treatment accuracy. In this work, the commissioning and clinical implementation of the OPTIVUE/MVCB system was presented. The geometry and gain calibration procedures for the system were described. The image quality characteristics of the OPTIVUE/MVCB system were measured and assessed qualitatively and quantitatively, including the image noise and uniformity, low-contrast resolution, and spatial resolution. The image reconstruction and registration software were evaluated. Dose at isocenter from CBCT and the EPID were evaluated using ionization chamber and thermo-luminescent dosimeters; then compared with that calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS- XiO 4.4). The results showed that there are no offsets greater than 1 mm in the flat panel alignment in the lateral and longitudinal direction over 18 months of the study. The image quality tests showed that the image noise and uniformity were within the acceptable range, and that a 2 cm large object with 1% electron density contrast can be detected with the OPTIVUE/MVCB system with 5 monitor units (MU) protocol. The registration software was accurate within 2 mm in the anterior-posterior, left-right, and superior-inferior directions. The additional dose to the patient from MV-CBCT study set with 5 MU at the isocenter of the treatment plan was 5 cGy. For Electronic portal image device (EPID) verification using two orthogonal images with 2 MU per image the additional dose to the patient was 3.8 cGy. These measured dose values were matched with that calculated by the TPS-XiO, where the calculated doses were 5.2 cGy and 3.9 cGy for MVCT and EPID respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3249731 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32497312012-01-06 Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography: Commissioning and evaluation of patient dose Abou-elenein, Hassan S. Attalla, Ehab M. Ammar, H. Eldesoky, Ismail Farouk, Mohamed Zaghloul, Mohamed S. J Med Phys Original Article The improvement in conformal radiotherapy techniques enables us to achieve steep dose gradients around the target which allows the delivery of higher doses to a tumor volume while maintaining the sparing of surrounding normal tissue. One of the reasons for this improvement was the implementation of intensity-modulated radio therapy (IMRT) by using linear accelerators fitted with multi-leaf collimator (MLC), Tomo therapy and Rapid arc. In this situation, verification of patient set-up and evaluation of internal organ motion just prior to radiation delivery become important. To this end, several volumetric image-guided techniques have been developed for patient localization, such as Siemens OPTIVUE/MVCB and MVision megavoltage cone beam CT (MV-CBCT) system. Quality assurance for MV-CBCT is important to insure that the performance of the Electronic portal image device (EPID) and MV-CBCT is suitable for the required treatment accuracy. In this work, the commissioning and clinical implementation of the OPTIVUE/MVCB system was presented. The geometry and gain calibration procedures for the system were described. The image quality characteristics of the OPTIVUE/MVCB system were measured and assessed qualitatively and quantitatively, including the image noise and uniformity, low-contrast resolution, and spatial resolution. The image reconstruction and registration software were evaluated. Dose at isocenter from CBCT and the EPID were evaluated using ionization chamber and thermo-luminescent dosimeters; then compared with that calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS- XiO 4.4). The results showed that there are no offsets greater than 1 mm in the flat panel alignment in the lateral and longitudinal direction over 18 months of the study. The image quality tests showed that the image noise and uniformity were within the acceptable range, and that a 2 cm large object with 1% electron density contrast can be detected with the OPTIVUE/MVCB system with 5 monitor units (MU) protocol. The registration software was accurate within 2 mm in the anterior-posterior, left-right, and superior-inferior directions. The additional dose to the patient from MV-CBCT study set with 5 MU at the isocenter of the treatment plan was 5 cGy. For Electronic portal image device (EPID) verification using two orthogonal images with 2 MU per image the additional dose to the patient was 3.8 cGy. These measured dose values were matched with that calculated by the TPS-XiO, where the calculated doses were 5.2 cGy and 3.9 cGy for MVCT and EPID respectively. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3249731/ /pubmed/22228929 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.89969 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abou-elenein, Hassan S. Attalla, Ehab M. Ammar, H. Eldesoky, Ismail Farouk, Mohamed Zaghloul, Mohamed S. Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography: Commissioning and evaluation of patient dose |
title | Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography: Commissioning and evaluation of patient dose |
title_full | Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography: Commissioning and evaluation of patient dose |
title_fullStr | Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography: Commissioning and evaluation of patient dose |
title_full_unstemmed | Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography: Commissioning and evaluation of patient dose |
title_short | Megavoltage cone beam computed tomography: Commissioning and evaluation of patient dose |
title_sort | megavoltage cone beam computed tomography: commissioning and evaluation of patient dose |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249731/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22228929 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.89969 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aboueleneinhassans megavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographycommissioningandevaluationofpatientdose AT attallaehabm megavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographycommissioningandevaluationofpatientdose AT ammarh megavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographycommissioningandevaluationofpatientdose AT eldesokyismail megavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographycommissioningandevaluationofpatientdose AT faroukmohamed megavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographycommissioningandevaluationofpatientdose AT zaghloulmohameds megavoltageconebeamcomputedtomographycommissioningandevaluationofpatientdose |