Cargando…

Dose volume histogram analysis and comparison of different radiobiological models using in-house developed software

The purpose of this study is to compare Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model versus Niemierko model for normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculation and Niemierko model versus Poisson-based model for tumor control probability (TCP) calculation in the ranking of different treatment plans for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oinam, Arun S., Singh, Lakhwant, Shukla, Arvind, Ghoshal, Sushmita, Kapoor, Rakesh, Sharma, Suresh C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22228931
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.89971
_version_ 1782220374501490688
author Oinam, Arun S.
Singh, Lakhwant
Shukla, Arvind
Ghoshal, Sushmita
Kapoor, Rakesh
Sharma, Suresh C.
author_facet Oinam, Arun S.
Singh, Lakhwant
Shukla, Arvind
Ghoshal, Sushmita
Kapoor, Rakesh
Sharma, Suresh C.
author_sort Oinam, Arun S.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to compare Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model versus Niemierko model for normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculation and Niemierko model versus Poisson-based model for tumor control probability (TCP) calculation in the ranking of different treatment plans for a patient undergoing radiotherapy. The standard normal tissue tolerance data were used to test the NTCP models. LKB model can reproduce the same complication probability data of normal tissue response on radiation, whereas Niemierko model cannot reproduce the same complication probability. Both Poisson-based and Niemierko models equally reproduce the same standard TCP data in testing of TCP. In case of clinical data generated from treatment planning system, NTCP calculated using LKB model was found to be different from that calculated using Niemierko model. When the fractionation effect was considered in LKB model, the calculated values of NTCPs were different but comparable with those of Niemierko model. In case of TCP calculation using these models, Poisson-based model calculated marginally higher control probability as compared to Niemierko model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3249733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32497332012-01-06 Dose volume histogram analysis and comparison of different radiobiological models using in-house developed software Oinam, Arun S. Singh, Lakhwant Shukla, Arvind Ghoshal, Sushmita Kapoor, Rakesh Sharma, Suresh C. J Med Phys Original Article The purpose of this study is to compare Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model versus Niemierko model for normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculation and Niemierko model versus Poisson-based model for tumor control probability (TCP) calculation in the ranking of different treatment plans for a patient undergoing radiotherapy. The standard normal tissue tolerance data were used to test the NTCP models. LKB model can reproduce the same complication probability data of normal tissue response on radiation, whereas Niemierko model cannot reproduce the same complication probability. Both Poisson-based and Niemierko models equally reproduce the same standard TCP data in testing of TCP. In case of clinical data generated from treatment planning system, NTCP calculated using LKB model was found to be different from that calculated using Niemierko model. When the fractionation effect was considered in LKB model, the calculated values of NTCPs were different but comparable with those of Niemierko model. In case of TCP calculation using these models, Poisson-based model calculated marginally higher control probability as compared to Niemierko model. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3249733/ /pubmed/22228931 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.89971 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Oinam, Arun S.
Singh, Lakhwant
Shukla, Arvind
Ghoshal, Sushmita
Kapoor, Rakesh
Sharma, Suresh C.
Dose volume histogram analysis and comparison of different radiobiological models using in-house developed software
title Dose volume histogram analysis and comparison of different radiobiological models using in-house developed software
title_full Dose volume histogram analysis and comparison of different radiobiological models using in-house developed software
title_fullStr Dose volume histogram analysis and comparison of different radiobiological models using in-house developed software
title_full_unstemmed Dose volume histogram analysis and comparison of different radiobiological models using in-house developed software
title_short Dose volume histogram analysis and comparison of different radiobiological models using in-house developed software
title_sort dose volume histogram analysis and comparison of different radiobiological models using in-house developed software
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3249733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22228931
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.89971
work_keys_str_mv AT oinamaruns dosevolumehistogramanalysisandcomparisonofdifferentradiobiologicalmodelsusinginhousedevelopedsoftware
AT singhlakhwant dosevolumehistogramanalysisandcomparisonofdifferentradiobiologicalmodelsusinginhousedevelopedsoftware
AT shuklaarvind dosevolumehistogramanalysisandcomparisonofdifferentradiobiologicalmodelsusinginhousedevelopedsoftware
AT ghoshalsushmita dosevolumehistogramanalysisandcomparisonofdifferentradiobiologicalmodelsusinginhousedevelopedsoftware
AT kapoorrakesh dosevolumehistogramanalysisandcomparisonofdifferentradiobiologicalmodelsusinginhousedevelopedsoftware
AT sharmasureshc dosevolumehistogramanalysisandcomparisonofdifferentradiobiologicalmodelsusinginhousedevelopedsoftware