Cargando…
Moral Arguments in the Debate over Nanotechnologies: Are We Talking Past Each Other?
How are we to understand the fact that the philosophical debate over nanotechnologies has been reduced to a clash of seemingly preprogrammed arguments and counterarguments that paralyzes all rational discussion of the ultimate ethical question of social acceptability in matters of nanotechnological...
Autores principales: | Patenaude, Johane, Legault, Georges A., Béland, Jean-Pierre, Parent, Monelle, Boissy, Patrick |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3250612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22247746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-011-0132-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Social and Ethical Acceptability of NBICs for Purposes of Human Enhancement: Why Does the Debate Remain Mired in Impasse?
por: Béland, Jean-Pierre, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Framework for the Analysis of Nanotechnologies’ Impacts and Ethical Acceptability: Basis of an Interdisciplinary Approach to Assessing Novel Technologies
por: Patenaude, Johane, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Support for the Development of Technological Innovations: Promoting Responsible Social Uses
por: Legault, Georges A., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Principles of argumentation and debate
por: Capp, Glenn R, et al.
Publicado: (1965) -
Effects of disciplinary cultures of researchers and research trainees on the acceptability of nanocarriers for drug delivery in different contexts of use: a mixed-methods study
por: Chenel, Vanessa, et al.
Publicado: (2015)