Cargando…

Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Perceived beliefs about breast cancer and breast cancer screening are important predictors for mammography utilization. This study adapted and validated the Champion's scale in Peru. This scale measures perceived susceptibility for breast cancer and perceived benefits and barriers f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huaman, Moises A, Kamimura-Nishimura, Kelly I, Kanamori, Mariano, Siu, Alejandro, Lescano, Andres G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3250928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22145936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-11-54
_version_ 1782220502121578496
author Huaman, Moises A
Kamimura-Nishimura, Kelly I
Kanamori, Mariano
Siu, Alejandro
Lescano, Andres G
author_facet Huaman, Moises A
Kamimura-Nishimura, Kelly I
Kanamori, Mariano
Siu, Alejandro
Lescano, Andres G
author_sort Huaman, Moises A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Perceived beliefs about breast cancer and breast cancer screening are important predictors for mammography utilization. This study adapted and validated the Champion's scale in Peru. This scale measures perceived susceptibility for breast cancer and perceived benefits and barriers for mammography. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among women ages 40 to 65 attending outpatient gynecology services in a public hospital in Peru. A group of experts developed and pre-tested a Spanish version of the Champion's scale to assess its comprehensibility (N = 20). Factor analysis, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability analyses were performed (N = 285). Concurrent validity compared scores from participants who had a mammogram and those who did not have it in the previous 15 months. T-test and multiple regression analysis adjusting for socio-demographic factors, mammography knowledge and other preventive behaviors were performed. RESULTS: The construct validity and reliability were optimal. Cronbach-Alpha coefficients were 0.75 (susceptibility), 0.72 (benefits) and 0.86 (barriers). Concurrent validity analysis showed an association between barriers and mammography screening use in bivariate (22.3 ± 6.7 vs. 30.2 ± 7.6; p < 0.001) and multiple regression analysis (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.18-0.43). Ages 50-60 years (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.19-4.65), history of prior Papanicolaou test (OR = 3.69, 95% CI = 1.84-7.40), and knowledge about breast cancer and mammography (OR = 3.69, 95% CI = 1.84-7.40) were also independently associated with mammography screening use. CONCLUSION: Concurrent validity analysis showed that the Champion's scale has important limitations for assessing perceived susceptibility for breast cancer and perceived benefits for mammography among Peruvian women. There is still a need for developing valid and reliable instruments for measuring perceived beliefs about breast cancer and mammography screening among Peruvian women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3250928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32509282012-01-05 Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study Huaman, Moises A Kamimura-Nishimura, Kelly I Kanamori, Mariano Siu, Alejandro Lescano, Andres G BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Perceived beliefs about breast cancer and breast cancer screening are important predictors for mammography utilization. This study adapted and validated the Champion's scale in Peru. This scale measures perceived susceptibility for breast cancer and perceived benefits and barriers for mammography. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among women ages 40 to 65 attending outpatient gynecology services in a public hospital in Peru. A group of experts developed and pre-tested a Spanish version of the Champion's scale to assess its comprehensibility (N = 20). Factor analysis, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability analyses were performed (N = 285). Concurrent validity compared scores from participants who had a mammogram and those who did not have it in the previous 15 months. T-test and multiple regression analysis adjusting for socio-demographic factors, mammography knowledge and other preventive behaviors were performed. RESULTS: The construct validity and reliability were optimal. Cronbach-Alpha coefficients were 0.75 (susceptibility), 0.72 (benefits) and 0.86 (barriers). Concurrent validity analysis showed an association between barriers and mammography screening use in bivariate (22.3 ± 6.7 vs. 30.2 ± 7.6; p < 0.001) and multiple regression analysis (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.18-0.43). Ages 50-60 years (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.19-4.65), history of prior Papanicolaou test (OR = 3.69, 95% CI = 1.84-7.40), and knowledge about breast cancer and mammography (OR = 3.69, 95% CI = 1.84-7.40) were also independently associated with mammography screening use. CONCLUSION: Concurrent validity analysis showed that the Champion's scale has important limitations for assessing perceived susceptibility for breast cancer and perceived benefits for mammography among Peruvian women. There is still a need for developing valid and reliable instruments for measuring perceived beliefs about breast cancer and mammography screening among Peruvian women. BioMed Central 2011-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3250928/ /pubmed/22145936 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-11-54 Text en Copyright ©2011 Huaman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huaman, Moises A
Kamimura-Nishimura, Kelly I
Kanamori, Mariano
Siu, Alejandro
Lescano, Andres G
Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study
title Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study
title_full Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study
title_short Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study
title_sort validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among peruvian women: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3250928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22145936
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-11-54
work_keys_str_mv AT huamanmoisesa validationofasusceptibilitybenefitsandbarrierscaleformammographyscreeningamongperuvianwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT kamimuranishimurakellyi validationofasusceptibilitybenefitsandbarrierscaleformammographyscreeningamongperuvianwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT kanamorimariano validationofasusceptibilitybenefitsandbarrierscaleformammographyscreeningamongperuvianwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT siualejandro validationofasusceptibilitybenefitsandbarrierscaleformammographyscreeningamongperuvianwomenacrosssectionalstudy
AT lescanoandresg validationofasusceptibilitybenefitsandbarrierscaleformammographyscreeningamongperuvianwomenacrosssectionalstudy