Cargando…

Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression

BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) has no curative treatment options. Some forms of PCa are indolent and slow growing, while others metastasise quickly and may prove fatal within a very short time. The basis of this variable prognosis is poorly understood, despite considerable research. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larkin, S E T, Holmes, S, Cree, I A, Walker, T, Basketter, V, Bickers, B, Harris, S, Garbis, S D, Townsend, P A, Aukim-Hastie, C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3251845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22075945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.490
_version_ 1782220567807524864
author Larkin, S E T
Holmes, S
Cree, I A
Walker, T
Basketter, V
Bickers, B
Harris, S
Garbis, S D
Townsend, P A
Aukim-Hastie, C
author_facet Larkin, S E T
Holmes, S
Cree, I A
Walker, T
Basketter, V
Bickers, B
Harris, S
Garbis, S D
Townsend, P A
Aukim-Hastie, C
author_sort Larkin, S E T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) has no curative treatment options. Some forms of PCa are indolent and slow growing, while others metastasise quickly and may prove fatal within a very short time. The basis of this variable prognosis is poorly understood, despite considerable research. The aim of this study was to identify markers associated with the progression of PCa. METHODS: Artificial neuronal network analysis combined with data from literature and previous work produced a panel of putative PCa progression markers, which were used in a transcriptomic analysis of 29 radical prostatectomy samples and correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS: Statistical analysis yielded seven putative markers of PCa progression, ANPEP, ABL1, PSCA, EFNA1, HSPB1, INMT and TRIP13. Two data transformation methods were utilised with only markers that were significant in both selected for further analysis. ANPEP and EFNA1 were significantly correlated with Gleason score. Models of progression co-utilising markers ANPEP and ABL1 or ANPEP and PSCA had the ability to correctly predict indolent or aggressive disease, based on Gleason score, in 89.7% and 86.2% of cases, respectively. Another model of TRIP13 expression in combination with preoperative PSA level and Gleason score was able to correctly predict recurrence in 85.7% of cases. CONCLUSION: This proof of principle study demonstrates a novel association of carcinogenic and tumourigenic gene expression with PCa stage and prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3251845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32518452013-01-03 Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression Larkin, S E T Holmes, S Cree, I A Walker, T Basketter, V Bickers, B Harris, S Garbis, S D Townsend, P A Aukim-Hastie, C Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) has no curative treatment options. Some forms of PCa are indolent and slow growing, while others metastasise quickly and may prove fatal within a very short time. The basis of this variable prognosis is poorly understood, despite considerable research. The aim of this study was to identify markers associated with the progression of PCa. METHODS: Artificial neuronal network analysis combined with data from literature and previous work produced a panel of putative PCa progression markers, which were used in a transcriptomic analysis of 29 radical prostatectomy samples and correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS: Statistical analysis yielded seven putative markers of PCa progression, ANPEP, ABL1, PSCA, EFNA1, HSPB1, INMT and TRIP13. Two data transformation methods were utilised with only markers that were significant in both selected for further analysis. ANPEP and EFNA1 were significantly correlated with Gleason score. Models of progression co-utilising markers ANPEP and ABL1 or ANPEP and PSCA had the ability to correctly predict indolent or aggressive disease, based on Gleason score, in 89.7% and 86.2% of cases, respectively. Another model of TRIP13 expression in combination with preoperative PSA level and Gleason score was able to correctly predict recurrence in 85.7% of cases. CONCLUSION: This proof of principle study demonstrates a novel association of carcinogenic and tumourigenic gene expression with PCa stage and prognosis. Nature Publishing Group 2012-01-03 2011-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3251845/ /pubmed/22075945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.490 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Larkin, S E T
Holmes, S
Cree, I A
Walker, T
Basketter, V
Bickers, B
Harris, S
Garbis, S D
Townsend, P A
Aukim-Hastie, C
Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression
title Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression
title_full Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression
title_fullStr Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression
title_full_unstemmed Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression
title_short Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression
title_sort identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3251845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22075945
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.490
work_keys_str_mv AT larkinset identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression
AT holmess identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression
AT creeia identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression
AT walkert identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression
AT basketterv identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression
AT bickersb identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression
AT harriss identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression
AT garbissd identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression
AT townsendpa identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression
AT aukimhastiec identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression