Cargando…
Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression
BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) has no curative treatment options. Some forms of PCa are indolent and slow growing, while others metastasise quickly and may prove fatal within a very short time. The basis of this variable prognosis is poorly understood, despite considerable research. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3251845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22075945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.490 |
_version_ | 1782220567807524864 |
---|---|
author | Larkin, S E T Holmes, S Cree, I A Walker, T Basketter, V Bickers, B Harris, S Garbis, S D Townsend, P A Aukim-Hastie, C |
author_facet | Larkin, S E T Holmes, S Cree, I A Walker, T Basketter, V Bickers, B Harris, S Garbis, S D Townsend, P A Aukim-Hastie, C |
author_sort | Larkin, S E T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) has no curative treatment options. Some forms of PCa are indolent and slow growing, while others metastasise quickly and may prove fatal within a very short time. The basis of this variable prognosis is poorly understood, despite considerable research. The aim of this study was to identify markers associated with the progression of PCa. METHODS: Artificial neuronal network analysis combined with data from literature and previous work produced a panel of putative PCa progression markers, which were used in a transcriptomic analysis of 29 radical prostatectomy samples and correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS: Statistical analysis yielded seven putative markers of PCa progression, ANPEP, ABL1, PSCA, EFNA1, HSPB1, INMT and TRIP13. Two data transformation methods were utilised with only markers that were significant in both selected for further analysis. ANPEP and EFNA1 were significantly correlated with Gleason score. Models of progression co-utilising markers ANPEP and ABL1 or ANPEP and PSCA had the ability to correctly predict indolent or aggressive disease, based on Gleason score, in 89.7% and 86.2% of cases, respectively. Another model of TRIP13 expression in combination with preoperative PSA level and Gleason score was able to correctly predict recurrence in 85.7% of cases. CONCLUSION: This proof of principle study demonstrates a novel association of carcinogenic and tumourigenic gene expression with PCa stage and prognosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3251845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32518452013-01-03 Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression Larkin, S E T Holmes, S Cree, I A Walker, T Basketter, V Bickers, B Harris, S Garbis, S D Townsend, P A Aukim-Hastie, C Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: Metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) has no curative treatment options. Some forms of PCa are indolent and slow growing, while others metastasise quickly and may prove fatal within a very short time. The basis of this variable prognosis is poorly understood, despite considerable research. The aim of this study was to identify markers associated with the progression of PCa. METHODS: Artificial neuronal network analysis combined with data from literature and previous work produced a panel of putative PCa progression markers, which were used in a transcriptomic analysis of 29 radical prostatectomy samples and correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS: Statistical analysis yielded seven putative markers of PCa progression, ANPEP, ABL1, PSCA, EFNA1, HSPB1, INMT and TRIP13. Two data transformation methods were utilised with only markers that were significant in both selected for further analysis. ANPEP and EFNA1 were significantly correlated with Gleason score. Models of progression co-utilising markers ANPEP and ABL1 or ANPEP and PSCA had the ability to correctly predict indolent or aggressive disease, based on Gleason score, in 89.7% and 86.2% of cases, respectively. Another model of TRIP13 expression in combination with preoperative PSA level and Gleason score was able to correctly predict recurrence in 85.7% of cases. CONCLUSION: This proof of principle study demonstrates a novel association of carcinogenic and tumourigenic gene expression with PCa stage and prognosis. Nature Publishing Group 2012-01-03 2011-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3251845/ /pubmed/22075945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.490 Text en Copyright © 2012 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Molecular Diagnostics Larkin, S E T Holmes, S Cree, I A Walker, T Basketter, V Bickers, B Harris, S Garbis, S D Townsend, P A Aukim-Hastie, C Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression |
title | Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression |
title_full | Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression |
title_fullStr | Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression |
title_short | Identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression |
title_sort | identification of markers of prostate cancer progression using candidate gene expression |
topic | Molecular Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3251845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22075945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larkinset identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression AT holmess identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression AT creeia identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression AT walkert identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression AT basketterv identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression AT bickersb identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression AT harriss identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression AT garbissd identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression AT townsendpa identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression AT aukimhastiec identificationofmarkersofprostatecancerprogressionusingcandidategeneexpression |