Cargando…

Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast

Modulation of single-cell responses by compound stimuli (target plus flankers) extending outside the cell’s receptive field (RF) may represent an early neural mechanism for encoding objects in visual space, enhancing their perceptual saliency. The spatial extent of contextual modulation is wide. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasamatsu, Takuji, Miller, Rich, Zhu, Zhao, Chang, Michael, Ishida, Yoshiyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3252032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19888567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1
Descripción
Sumario:Modulation of single-cell responses by compound stimuli (target plus flankers) extending outside the cell’s receptive field (RF) may represent an early neural mechanism for encoding objects in visual space, enhancing their perceptual saliency. The spatial extent of contextual modulation is wide. The size of the RF is known to be dynamically variable. It has been suggested that RF expansion when target contrast decreases is the real cause of effects attributed to modulation by flankers. This is not the case. We directly compared, in the same cells, the extent of RF size changes when stimulus contrast decreased with that revealed by systematically changing the target-and-collinear-flankers separation. We found that RF expansion at low contrast was not universal, and that the spatial extent of RF expansion, when it existed, was smaller than that of collinear flanker modulation. We conclude that the two processes in striate cortex work independently from each other. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.