Cargando…

Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast

Modulation of single-cell responses by compound stimuli (target plus flankers) extending outside the cell’s receptive field (RF) may represent an early neural mechanism for encoding objects in visual space, enhancing their perceptual saliency. The spatial extent of contextual modulation is wide. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasamatsu, Takuji, Miller, Rich, Zhu, Zhao, Chang, Michael, Ishida, Yoshiyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3252032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19888567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1
_version_ 1782220595720617984
author Kasamatsu, Takuji
Miller, Rich
Zhu, Zhao
Chang, Michael
Ishida, Yoshiyuki
author_facet Kasamatsu, Takuji
Miller, Rich
Zhu, Zhao
Chang, Michael
Ishida, Yoshiyuki
author_sort Kasamatsu, Takuji
collection PubMed
description Modulation of single-cell responses by compound stimuli (target plus flankers) extending outside the cell’s receptive field (RF) may represent an early neural mechanism for encoding objects in visual space, enhancing their perceptual saliency. The spatial extent of contextual modulation is wide. The size of the RF is known to be dynamically variable. It has been suggested that RF expansion when target contrast decreases is the real cause of effects attributed to modulation by flankers. This is not the case. We directly compared, in the same cells, the extent of RF size changes when stimulus contrast decreased with that revealed by systematically changing the target-and-collinear-flankers separation. We found that RF expansion at low contrast was not universal, and that the spatial extent of RF expansion, when it existed, was smaller than that of collinear flanker modulation. We conclude that the two processes in striate cortex work independently from each other. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3252032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32520322012-01-11 Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast Kasamatsu, Takuji Miller, Rich Zhu, Zhao Chang, Michael Ishida, Yoshiyuki Exp Brain Res Research Article Modulation of single-cell responses by compound stimuli (target plus flankers) extending outside the cell’s receptive field (RF) may represent an early neural mechanism for encoding objects in visual space, enhancing their perceptual saliency. The spatial extent of contextual modulation is wide. The size of the RF is known to be dynamically variable. It has been suggested that RF expansion when target contrast decreases is the real cause of effects attributed to modulation by flankers. This is not the case. We directly compared, in the same cells, the extent of RF size changes when stimulus contrast decreased with that revealed by systematically changing the target-and-collinear-flankers separation. We found that RF expansion at low contrast was not universal, and that the spatial extent of RF expansion, when it existed, was smaller than that of collinear flanker modulation. We conclude that the two processes in striate cortex work independently from each other. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2009-11-04 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3252032/ /pubmed/19888567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kasamatsu, Takuji
Miller, Rich
Zhu, Zhao
Chang, Michael
Ishida, Yoshiyuki
Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast
title Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast
title_full Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast
title_fullStr Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast
title_full_unstemmed Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast
title_short Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast
title_sort collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3252032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19888567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kasamatsutakuji collinearfacilitationisindependentofreceptivefieldexpansionatlowcontrast
AT millerrich collinearfacilitationisindependentofreceptivefieldexpansionatlowcontrast
AT zhuzhao collinearfacilitationisindependentofreceptivefieldexpansionatlowcontrast
AT changmichael collinearfacilitationisindependentofreceptivefieldexpansionatlowcontrast
AT ishidayoshiyuki collinearfacilitationisindependentofreceptivefieldexpansionatlowcontrast