Cargando…
Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast
Modulation of single-cell responses by compound stimuli (target plus flankers) extending outside the cell’s receptive field (RF) may represent an early neural mechanism for encoding objects in visual space, enhancing their perceptual saliency. The spatial extent of contextual modulation is wide. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3252032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19888567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1 |
_version_ | 1782220595720617984 |
---|---|
author | Kasamatsu, Takuji Miller, Rich Zhu, Zhao Chang, Michael Ishida, Yoshiyuki |
author_facet | Kasamatsu, Takuji Miller, Rich Zhu, Zhao Chang, Michael Ishida, Yoshiyuki |
author_sort | Kasamatsu, Takuji |
collection | PubMed |
description | Modulation of single-cell responses by compound stimuli (target plus flankers) extending outside the cell’s receptive field (RF) may represent an early neural mechanism for encoding objects in visual space, enhancing their perceptual saliency. The spatial extent of contextual modulation is wide. The size of the RF is known to be dynamically variable. It has been suggested that RF expansion when target contrast decreases is the real cause of effects attributed to modulation by flankers. This is not the case. We directly compared, in the same cells, the extent of RF size changes when stimulus contrast decreased with that revealed by systematically changing the target-and-collinear-flankers separation. We found that RF expansion at low contrast was not universal, and that the spatial extent of RF expansion, when it existed, was smaller than that of collinear flanker modulation. We conclude that the two processes in striate cortex work independently from each other. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3252032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32520322012-01-11 Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast Kasamatsu, Takuji Miller, Rich Zhu, Zhao Chang, Michael Ishida, Yoshiyuki Exp Brain Res Research Article Modulation of single-cell responses by compound stimuli (target plus flankers) extending outside the cell’s receptive field (RF) may represent an early neural mechanism for encoding objects in visual space, enhancing their perceptual saliency. The spatial extent of contextual modulation is wide. The size of the RF is known to be dynamically variable. It has been suggested that RF expansion when target contrast decreases is the real cause of effects attributed to modulation by flankers. This is not the case. We directly compared, in the same cells, the extent of RF size changes when stimulus contrast decreased with that revealed by systematically changing the target-and-collinear-flankers separation. We found that RF expansion at low contrast was not universal, and that the spatial extent of RF expansion, when it existed, was smaller than that of collinear flanker modulation. We conclude that the two processes in striate cortex work independently from each other. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2009-11-04 2010 /pmc/articles/PMC3252032/ /pubmed/19888567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2009 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kasamatsu, Takuji Miller, Rich Zhu, Zhao Chang, Michael Ishida, Yoshiyuki Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast |
title | Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast |
title_full | Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast |
title_fullStr | Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast |
title_full_unstemmed | Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast |
title_short | Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast |
title_sort | collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3252032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19888567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2057-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kasamatsutakuji collinearfacilitationisindependentofreceptivefieldexpansionatlowcontrast AT millerrich collinearfacilitationisindependentofreceptivefieldexpansionatlowcontrast AT zhuzhao collinearfacilitationisindependentofreceptivefieldexpansionatlowcontrast AT changmichael collinearfacilitationisindependentofreceptivefieldexpansionatlowcontrast AT ishidayoshiyuki collinearfacilitationisindependentofreceptivefieldexpansionatlowcontrast |